- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
To: MrGates 120368...@qq.com
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] b reset does not work in u-boot_v2010.12-rc3 with
eldk4.2
Dear MrGates,
please always keep the mailing list on
Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=,
In message aanlktinux-nmpundbm=scyeahckbad9=dx8b3ro7g...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
i trying to sue the kernel's Makefile rule, but the issue is not solved.
WARNING: could not set linux,stdout-path FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND.
ERROR: /chosen node create failed - must
On 01/11/2011 08:48 PM, Ben Gardiner wrote:
There are two separate issues causing failure of ea20 builds.
I discovered them while trying to build a da850evm load with RMII support. The
second patch affects all boards that could use CONFIG_DRIVER_TI_EMAC_USE_RMII
of which ea20 is the only
On 01/11/2011 08:48 PM, Ben Gardiner wrote:
This patch fixes ea20 after commit 6d8962e814c15807dd6ac5757904be2a02d187b8
where $(obj)lib$(BOARD).a was changed to $(obj)lib$(BOARD).o in almost all the
Makefiles except ea20, probably due to merge path of the changes in 2010.12.
Signed-off-by:
2011/1/12 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de:
Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=,
In message aanlktinvninbre--k=a+j_p8yjrr8jvahomjt7fy=...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
i use dtc compiler with following command:
dtc -R 8 -b 0 -O dtb -I dts -S 0x3000 -o my.dtb my.dts
Booting process gives
Dear Shaohui Xie,
In message 1294817626-4727-1-git-send-email-b21...@freescale.com you wrote:
PBL(pre-boot loader): SPI flash used as RCW(Reset Configuration Word) and
PBI(pre-boot initialization) source, CPC(CoreNet Platform Cache) used as 1M
SRAM
where PBL will copy whole U-BOOT image to,
Dear MrGates,
In message 745589936d574232be24ea063064b...@mrgates you wrote:
[ lots of unrelated quote deleted]
Please restrict your quoting to the relevant parts; see
http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
I use SkyEye 1.2.5 cooperates with arm-linux-gdb .
Now the serial
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
I Think i am debugging on u-boot.Because i am upgrading u-boot from v1.1.2
to v2010.12-rc3.
I have tried to run u-boot on skyeye 1.2.5 ,and that works fine.
Two version of U-boot are base on the same hardwares:
CPU: S3c44b0
FLash: SST30vf3201
Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS for
config.h to set.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:10 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
diff --git a/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
b/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
index 15bbf20..918775d 100644
--- a/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
+++ b/board/freescale/corenet_ds/config.mk
@@ -24,4 +24,10 @@
# P4080DS
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1294822268-22266-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
#ifndef RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
+#ifdef CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
+#define RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
+#else
#define RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS 0xfffc
#endif
+#endif
Michal Simek wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
please pull the following changes.
Ping.
Michal
Thanks,
Michal
The following changes since commit
89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
Mike Frysinger (1):
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size
are available in the git repository at:
On Saturday 08 January 2011 07:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 08/01/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit :
snip..
+/* some utility macros */
+#define mask(start, end) \
+ (((1 ((end) - (start) + 1)) - 1) (start))
+
+#define mask_n_get(reg, start, end) \
+ (((reg) mask(start, end)) (start))
Old address of RESET_VECTOR were overwritten by the bss sector, making
impossible its run from xmd.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado ricardo.riba...@gmail.com
---
boards.cfg | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg
index
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 1294816806-32614-2-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
the RTC's show up at different addresses on
---
Use CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL instead of CONFIG_PBL_BOOT_INDIRECT according to
Kumar's comment.
CONFIG_RAMBOOT_PBL needs to be documented in the README!
[Xie Shaohui] OK, I'll submit a patch of README.
/* TLB 1 */
/* *I*** - Covers boot page */
+#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT)
On Jan 12, 2011, at 2:59 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1294822268-22266-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
#ifndef RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
+#ifdef CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
+#define RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESSCONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS
Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS for
config.h to set.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1294824140-22519-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
We mimic what 4xx does and introduce CONFIG_RESET_VECTOR_ADDRESS for
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4d2d7122.60...@denx.de you wrote:
Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
the RTC's show up at different addresses on the bus - but ther emight
be even
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add the MX53 boot image support.
This patch has been tested on Freescale MX53EVK board
and MX51EVK board.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
Tested on vision2 board, too.
Tested-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
Best
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
Add initial support for Freescale MX53 processor,
- Add the iomux support and the pin definition,
- Add the regs definition, clean up some unused def from mx51,
- Add the low level init support, make use the freq input of setup_pll macro
---
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add FEC support for Freescale MX53 processor
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
drivers/net/fec_mxc.c |2 +-
drivers/net/fec_mxc.h |4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-imx,
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add UART support for Freescale MX53 processor
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
drivers/serial/serial_mxc.c |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks.
Best regards,
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add mxc_gpio support for Freescale MX53 processor
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
Changes for v2
- put this patch into the same patchset with MX53 support as
Stefano comments,
---
drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c |9
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add I2C support for Freescale MX53 processor
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
Changes for v2:
-address the comments of Heiko, add #if defined(CONFIG_MX31)
to avoid break MX31 build. Move CONFIG_HARD_I2C to the top
of
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add I2C interface for fsl_pmic driver support
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
Changes for v2:
- Address the comments from Stefano,
- factor out the param_check in pmic_reg for both spi/i2c
- Address the comments
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
This patch add the MX53 boot image support.
This patch has been tested on Freescale MX53EVK board
and MX51EVK board.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
Changes for v2:
- Address the following comments from Stefano,
- Get rid
On 01/04/2011 09:27 AM, Jason Liu wrote:
Add initial support for MX53EVK board support.
FEC, SD/MMC, UART, I2C, have been supported.
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com
---
Changes for v2:
-Address the comments from Stefano, Albert and Wolfgang,
-remove the ivt.S file
Hi Wolfgang,
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4d2d7122.60...@denx.de you wrote:
Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
the RTC's show up at different addresses on the bus - but ther
Hello Heiko,
[...]
diff --git a/boards.cfg b/boards.cfg
index 94b8745..9e1fc14 100644
--- a/boards.cfg
+++ b/boards.cfg
@@ -241,6 +241,9 @@ cm5200 powerpc mpc5xxx
digsy_mtcpowerpc mpc5xxx digsy_mtc
digsy_mtc_LOWBOOT powerpc mpc5xxx
Hello Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 4d2d7122.60...@denx.de you wrote:
Global question: do we really need an CONFIG_DIGSY_REV5? Is there not
a way to determine the revision by probing the hardware? For example,
the RTC's show up at different addresses on the bus - but ther emight
Hello.
On 11-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote:
Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
initial function must be change.
Signed-off-by: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
b/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
index 35aa40b..52b44a8
Hi,
I am trying to make the new relocation scheme to work on the mx31pdk board.
With this patch applied the mx31pdk build works, but not able to get a U-boot
prompt yet.
I copied the nand_spl/board/karo/tx25/u-boot.lds to the mx31pdk one.
I am not certain whether the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
On 11.01.2011 3:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
it isnt a problem to have the parens, and it keeps things sane if someone
does something like:
#define CONFIG_SYS_BD_INFO_ADDR SOME_DEFINE + 0x1000
This would be a violation of basic rules of defensive coding.
Please drop these parens.
i dont
Hi Wolfgang Heiko,
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 08:59:20 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
diff --git a/doc/README.cfi b/doc/README.cfi
new file mode 100644
index 000..fa35108
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/README.cfi
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+known issues:
+
+using M29W128GH from Numonyx:
+
+You
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4d2d81c3.7010...@denx.de you wrote:
Maybe you can ask the hardware guys again?
Ok. done. As Detlev mentioned in the meantime the LOWBOOT cases
can be removed, done.
Thanks.
For the probing, a temporary address can be used. You set up the
final
Hi Dirk,
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:23 Dirk Eibach wrote:
Board support for the Guntermann Drunck DLVision-10G.
A few comments below...
Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach eib...@gdsys.de
---
MAINTAINERS|1 +
arch/powerpc/include/asm/global_data.h |3 +
Hi Dirk,
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:24 Dirk Eibach wrote:
Add support for multiple FPGAs per board for gdsys
405ep architecture.
Signed-off-by: Dirk Eibach eib...@gdsys.de
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/global_data.h |2 +-
board/gdsys/405ep/405ep.c | 62 +
Hi Dirk,
On Monday 10 January 2011 13:33:25 Dirk Eibach wrote:
Add support for dual link osd hardware for gdsys 405ep.
This patch also changes many lines introduced by the 2 previous patches. Again
I'm thinking if it makes more sense to squash all those 3 patches into one.
Would be
On 01/12/2011 07:08 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 11-01-2011 17:52, seedshope wrote:
Since SDRAM init function have already change, So the SDRAM
initial function must be change.
Signed-off-by: seedshopebocui...@gmail.com
diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk6400/smdk6400.c
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
From: Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Reading C99 6.7.3 8 and the comment 114) there, I think it is a bug of that
gcc version to ignore the
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm generated by gcc 4.5.1, looks good.
The wrong optimization in arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/clock.c is gone and
the writeb in
On Jan 12, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1294824140-22519-1-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
Rather than defining it config.mk we can set it in config.h and remove
config.mk from several boards that don't need it.
We mimic what
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 2010/12/17 17:13:47:
Dear Joakim Tjernlund,
In message
of3301f88e.e61f6369-onc12577fc.00573ebc-c12577fc.00576...@transmode.se
you wrote:
Great! then we got:
[PATCH] PowerPC: Move -fPIC flag to common place
[PATCH] PowerPC: Add
Hwconfig is called before relocating. Use the new hwconfig APIs.
Signed-off-by: York Sun york...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/fsl_corenet_serdes.c
Dear seedshope,
In message 4d2dc040.7040...@gmail.com you wrote:
ok, But I don't know how number tab indent is appropriate. May be the
effect as following?
You should start reading http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/CodingStyle
(and follow the links shown there).
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
Dear Alexander Holler,
In message 4d2dcb18.20...@ahsoftware.de you wrote:
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm generated by gcc 4.5.1, looks good.
The
Am 12.01.2011 17:40, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Alexander Holler,
In message4d2dcb18.20...@ahsoftware.de you wrote:
Am 09.01.2011 23:19, schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
gcc 4.5.1 seems to ignore (at least some) volatile definitions,
avoid that as done in the kernel.
Have had a look at the asm
-Original Message-
From: Paulraj, Sandeep [mailto:s-paul...@ti.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:00 PM
To: Tom Warren; Tom Warren; u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] arm: Tegra2: Add support for NVIDIA
Seaboard board Signed-off-by: Tom Warren
Hi Wolfgang,
Hi all,
In message m2sjxrxm38@ohwell.denx.de Detlev Zundel wrote:
may I ask again for opinions about enabling that feature?
I also would like to see it. Wolfgang, is there anything that you
don't like about this option?
Do you have any comments or pros or cons
Hi Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 18:47:45 Detlev Zundel wrote:
may I ask again for opinions about enabling that feature?
I also would like to see it. Wolfgang, is there anything that you
don't like about this option?
Do you have any comments or pros or cons for/against
Le 12/01/2011 05:31, Lei Wen a écrit :
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Lei Wenadrian.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Albert,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Albert ARIBAUDalbert.arib...@free.fr
wrote:
Hi,
Le 11/01/2011 16:40, Lei Wen a écrit :
flush_cache function should only be called
(I realize I did not answer the other ones)
Le 08/01/2011 11:06, Aneesh V a écrit :
Out of curiosity, can you elaborate on why the compiler would optimize
better in these cases?
While counting down the termination condition check is against 0. So
you can just decrement the loop count using
Le 12/01/2011 10:08, Aneesh V a écrit :
On Saturday 08 January 2011 07:36 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 08/01/2011 14:17, Aneesh V a écrit :
snip..
+/* some utility macros */
+#define mask(start, end) \
+ (((1 ((end) - (start) + 1)) - 1) (start))
+
+#define mask_n_get(reg, start, end) \
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1294636905-30832-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
drivers/block/Makefile |1 +
drivers/block/mxc_ata.c | 149 +++
2 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/block/mxc_ata.c
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com
---
board/efikamx/Makefile | 52
board/efikamx/config.mk| 25 ++
board/efikamx/efikamx.c| 668
board/efikamx/imximage.cfg | 124
boards.cfg |1 +
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1294636905-30832-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
Dear Michal Simek,
In message 4d2d6d68.3090...@monstr.eu you wrote:
Michal Simek wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
please pull the following changes.
Ping.
pong.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office:
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 17:43:37 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
The following changes since commit
89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 17:44:18 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
The following changes since commit
89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
Dear Michal Simek,
In message 4d2abcaf.1040...@monstr.eu you wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
please pull the following changes.
Thanks,
Michal
The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
Mike Frysinger (1):
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size
are
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 20110105.30744...@denx.de you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit 89c95f0cd3f8140f3b8a82a22a6a144c148d09c6:
asm-offsets: generate bd_t size (2011-01-09 18:08:20 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 20110045.45419...@denx.de you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit 0e7790d45c1a2cda40458adb28707eaa5041:
LAN91C*: Change chip names to fit the eth_device struct size (2011-01-10
22:38:36
+0100)
are available in the git
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 20110111.42910...@denx.de you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit 0e7790d45c1a2cda40458adb28707eaa5041:
LAN91C*: Change chip names to fit the eth_device struct size (2011-01-10
22:38:36
+0100)
are available in the git
Dear Nobuhiro Iwamatsu,
In message aanlktin+mbakrexd7pmuwjwa9npekm2g6f3vgjzkg...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
The following changes since commit 0e7790d45c1a2cda40458adb28707eaa5041:
LAN91C*: Change chip names to fit the eth_device struct size
(2011-01-10 22:38:36
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201101121750.06963.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
I cannot find any trace of these commits on the mailing list nor in
patchwork. Am I missing something?
i mentioned in the original summary that these were too large for the list
because i did quite a bit of
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201101121750.37504.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
See previous message. Not pulled either.
you replied to the same e-mail twice
Sorry, I somehow had a duplicated message in my folder.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD:
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
board/bf506f-ezkit/Makefile | 54 +++
board/bf506f-ezkit/bf506f-ezkit.c | 27 ++
boards.cfg|1 +
include/configs/bf506f-ezkit.h| 102
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:03:35 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
I cannot find any trace of these commits on the mailing list nor in
patchwork. Am I missing something?
i mentioned in the original summary that these were too large for the
list because i did quite a
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 1294874051-19958-1-git-send-email-vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
board/bf506f-ezkit/Makefile | 54 +++
board/bf506f-ezkit/bf506f-ezkit.c |
Replying from my Gmail account until NVIDIA IT can remove the canned disclaimer.
Sorry for the top-quote - just wanted to see if Gmail would correctly
quote previous text.
If there are no other critiques or NAKs, etc., then I'll start working
on a V2 patch with
Sandeep's changes.
Thanks,
Tom
The following changes since commit c6b734f5aea2ba75caaa1929f7e649ecda8d2f31:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-sh
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git master
Alexander Holler (1):
nand: fix bug with
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:10:24 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
MAINTAINERS |1 +
board/bf506f-ezkit/Makefile | 54 +++
board/bf506f-ezkit/bf506f-ezkit.c | 27
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201101121808.17659.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
stop making crap up. i'm not sneaking anything thing in. i explicitly
called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find them.
Did you? In some summary message nobody is going to read?
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 14:48:17 Ben Gardiner wrote:
This patch fixes ea20 after 8ef583a0351590a91394499eb5ca2ab8a703d959 where
the u-boot custom PHY_ macros were replaced with those of linux/mii.h MII_
definitions except in the RMII support for davinci_emac. Probably also due
to the
On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 07:07:32 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Linker needs to use the proper endian/bfd flags even when doing partial
linking. LDFLAGS_u-boot sets linker option which is called it when U-boot
is built (u-boot final).
LDFLAGS sets necessary option by partial linking (use in
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:00:52 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear =?UTF-8?B?5byg5oms?=,
In message aanlktinux-nmpundbm=scyeahckbad9=dx8b3ro7g...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
i trying to sue the kernel's Makefile rule, but the issue is not solved.
WARNING: could not set
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201101121808.17659.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
stop making crap up. i'm not sneaking anything thing in. i explicitly
called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find them.
Actually I can see absolutely no good reason for not posting
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:18:25 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
stop making crap up. i'm not sneaking anything thing in. i explicitly
called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find
them.
Did you? In some summary message nobody is going to
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 18:32:36 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
stop making crap up. i'm not sneaking anything thing in. i explicitly
called out these patches on the list and mentioned exactly where to find
them.
Actually I can see absolutely no good reason for not
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201101121837.43007.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Actually I can see absolutely no good reason for not posting these patches.
As far as I can tell, none of them exceeds the ML's hard size limit.
i dont know what you're looking at, but you're mistaken. i
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201101121836.14803.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
that's crap. the whole point of the summary message is to *summarize* the
patchset and give an overview of what's going on.
Right. But (links to) patches are NOT posted in a summary message but
sperately, with
Hi,
Your Signed-off-by seems to have made its way into the subject line. It
should be moved into the email contents. A brief description of what
this patch does, what peripherals are supported, etc would be nice too.
snip
create mode 100644 board/tegra2/common/board.c
create mode 100644
snip
--- a/boards.cfg
+++ b/boards.cfg
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ omap4_panda arm armv7
panda ti
omap4_sdp4430arm armv7 sdp4430 ti
omap4
s5p_goni arm armv7 goni
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message4d2d324c.3010...@gmail.com you wrote:
Hello,
I met this error (use GNU make 3.80).
$ make MPC885ADS_config
$ make
/home/namsh/work/u-boot/arch/powerpc/config.mk:35: Extraneous text after
`else' directive
/home/namsh/work/u-boot/arch/powerpc/config.mk:37:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:47:08 +0900
gmane gow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I met this error (use GNU make 3.80).
else ifdef appears to be new in make 3.81.
$ make MPC885ADS_config
$ make
/home/namsh/work/u-boot/arch/powerpc/config.mk:35: Extraneous text after
`else' directive
1. I want to fit an environment and the bootloader
into a single flash
sector.
This is a very bad idea as it will open a window brick your
system at
each and every saveenv command.
I strongly recommend not to do that.
This issue is well understood.
Yet, we are talking an
I just got EHCI support working with our chip and I was wondering what sort of
performance I could expect using ext2? Right now it seems extremely slow
coming off of a fast solid-state drive. I'm getting around 100KB/second. It's
running at full-speed (480Mbps). Is this normal?
We are
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote:
Hello Chris,
Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
I am responsible for your patch, so ...
Chris Packham wrote:
This adds support for for the PCA9535/PCA9539 family of gpio devices which
Hallo,
Das Managementteam unserer Organisation mochte sich hiermit bei Ihnen fur Ihr
Interesse an unseren Job Angeboten bedanken.
Die Firma AVEKO ist ein Handler der fuhrenden Klimaanlagehersteller, wie z.B.
SAMSUNG, YORK, LG. Au?erdem ist unsere Firma ein Handler von AIRELEC
Gesellschaften,
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES1_ADDR was defined wrong as CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES2_OFFSET. It should be CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES1_OFFSET.
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar prabha...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/immap_85xx.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:02 +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de wrote:
Hello Chris,
Sorry for the late reply, but just looked in patchwork and found that
I am responsible for your patch, so ...
Chris Packham wrote:
This adds
Dear Aaron Williams,
In message 201101121955.04367.aaron.willi...@caviumnetworks.com you wrote:
I just got EHCI support working with our chip and I was wondering what sort
of
performance I could expect using ext2? Right now it seems extremely slow
coming off of a fast solid-state drive.
Dear Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579,
In message
071a08f2c6a57e4e94d980eca553f874070...@039-sn1mpn1-004.039d.mgd.msft.net you
wrote:
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES1_ADDR was defined wrong as CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_SERDES2_OFFSET. It should be CONFIG_SYS_IMMR +
Thanks for your comments. Please see my response inline.
Regards,
Prabhakar
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 11:42 AM
To: Kushwaha Prabhakar-B32579
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] PATCH][v0][85xx/P1_P2]
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit cdc51c294ad33879c4e57edf4c9d2155381b1d59:
Merge branch 'next' of ../next (2010-12-22 21:16:17 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master
Liu Hui-R64343 (9):
MX51EVK: UART does not print
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Michal Simek,
In message 4d2d6d68.3090...@monstr.eu you wrote:
Michal Simek wrote:
Dear Wolfgang,
please pull the following changes.
Ping.
pong.
:-)
Best regards,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of
Le 13/01/2011 07:40, Stefano Babic a écrit :
Hi Wolfgang,
The following changes since commit cdc51c294ad33879c4e57edf4c9d2155381b1d59:
Merge branch 'next' of ../next (2010-12-22 21:16:17 +0100)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-imx.git master
Liu
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
