Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 07:50:46AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >> Dear Tom,
> >>
> >> In message <20130527233735.GZ17119@bill-the-cat> you wro
Hi Pantelis,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:43:06 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Hi Benoît
>
> On May 28, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>
> > Dear Pantelis Antoniou,
> >
> > On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:05:12 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> >> Hi T
Hi Albert,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:01:46 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Add a Makefile target ('checkarmreloc') which
> fails of the ELF binary contains relocation records
^
if
Sorry to have missed that in my review of v1.
> of types other than R_ARM_RELATIVE.
The rest of the pa
Hi Albert,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:01:49 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> This change is only done where needed: some linker
> scripts may contain __image_copy_{start,end} yet
> remain unchanged.
>
> Also, __image_copy_end needs its own section; putting
> it in relocation sections changes their fla
Hi Alison,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:55:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> This patch adds the IOMUX support for Vybrid VF610 platform.
>
> There is a little difference for IOMUXC module between VF610 and i.MX
> platform, the muxmode and pad configuration share one 32bit register on
> VF610, but they
Hi Alison,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:55:42 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> This patch adds generic codes to support Freescale's Vybrid VF610 CPU.
>
> It aligns Vybrid VF610 platform with i.MX platform. As there are
> some differences between VF610 and i.MX platforms, the specific
> codes are in the ar
is already done in fec_reg_setup(), so this piece of
> code could just leave untouched the FEC_RCNTRL_RGMII / FEC_RCNTRL_RMII /
> FEC_RCNTRL_MII_MODE bits.
[...]
Reviewed-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Best regards,
Benoît
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Bo
Hi Alison,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:16:20 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Alison,
>
> On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:55:42 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> > This patch adds generic codes to support Freescale's Vybrid VF610 CPU.
> >
> > It aligns Vybrid VF610 platform
Hi Alison,
On Tuesday, May 28, 2013 10:55:47 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> VF610TWR is a board based on Vybrid VF610 SoC.
>
> This patch adds basic support for Vybrid VF610TWR board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
> Signed-off-by: Jason Jin
> Signed-off-by: TsiChung Liew
[...]
> diff --git a/inc
Hi Alison,
On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:37:32 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> Hi, Benoit,
>
> > > > diff --git a/doc/README.vf610 b/doc/README.vf610 new file mode
> > > > 100644 index 000..38cf5cf
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/doc/README.vf610
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > > +U-Boot for
> command args
> > */
> > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_BARGSIZE CONFIG_SYS_CBSIZE
> > > +
> > > +#define CONFIG_CMD_MEMTEST
> > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_START 0x8001
> > > +#define CONFIG_SYS_MEMTEST_END 0x87C0
> &
ery very long.
>
> Agree. This is a property of the processor and should be automatically
> set. It should not flow into board config file, and having a family of
> processor we cannot use ifdef CONFIG_VF610.
>
> IMHO the patch is ok.
>
> Acked-by: Stefano Babic
I agree:
Reviewed-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Best regards,
Benoît
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Stefano,
On Friday, May 31, 2013 10:59:03 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 29/05/2013 16:46, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi Alison,
> >
>
> Hi Benoit,
>
> >>> I have just noticed that this was actually in 6/7. Why are you putting
> >>> this i
ontroller (OCOTP)
> on MXC
>
> This IP can be found on the following SoCs:
> + - Vybrid VF610,
> - i.MX6.
>
> Note that this IP is different from albeit similar to the IPs of the same
> name
Reviewed-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Best regards,
Benoît
___
Hi Andy, Fabio,
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 11:13:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> > I recently tried booting the VF610 support on the Tower board, but the mac
> > address is reversed in Linux userspace. DHCP/BOOTP seems to work proper
Hi Fabio,
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 11:17:45 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> No need to use the or operator, so just remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> ---
> board/freescale/vf610twr/vf610twr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --
On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 11:16:17 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Hi Andy, Fabio,
>
> On Wednesday, June 5, 2013 11:13:52 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Andy Voltz wrote:
> > > I recently tried booting the VF610
Hi Alison,
On Thursday, June 6, 2013 5:36:23 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> Hi, Benoit,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Benoît Thébaudeau [mailto:benoit.thebaud...@advansee.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 5:46 AM
> > To: Fabio Estevam
> >
/lib/sections.c
>
> 6. relocate_code is optimized based on the fact that
> symbol references are now always valid even before
> relcation, and that only R_ARM_RELATIVE relocations
> will be met.
>
> Changes in v3:
> - fix commit message typo (of -> if)
> - fix com
Hi Fabio,
On Friday, December 20, 2013 9:46:37 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam
>
> When using the fuse API in U-boot user must calculate the 'bank' and 'word'
> values.
>
> Provide a real example on how to calculate such values for the mx6q.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
> -
or the mx6quad case, please check the "46.5 OCOTP Memory
> Map/Register
> +Definition" from the "i.MX 6Dual/6Quad Applications Processor Reference
> Manual,
> +Rev. 1, 04/2013" document. For example, for the MAC fuses we have:
> +
> +Address:
> +21
Hi Albert,
On Thursday, January 30, 2014 11:02:46 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> This prevents references to _end from generating absolute
> relocation records.
>
> This change is binary invariant for ARM targets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Albert ARIBAUD
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Rebase onto u-boot-a
Dear Nikita Kiryanov, Fabio, all,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote:
> I noticed we have a lot of unused video drivers, specifically:
>
> CONFIG_EXYNOS_PWM_BL
> CONFIG_L5F31188
> CONFIG_SED156X
> CONFIG_VIDEO_COREBOOT
> CONFIG_VIDEO_IMX25LCDC
Fabio, do you think that this on
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Thomas Diener wrote:
> Hi folks,
> do you have any comments or statements for this patches?
You already have received replies to 1, 3, 4 and 8 / 8 in May:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2014-May/179759.html
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2
Commit 41623c9 'arm: move exception handling out of start.S files' missed some
linker scripts. Hence, some boards no longer had exception handling linked since
this commit. Restore the original behavior by adding the .vectors section to
these linker scripts.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Théb
Hi Magnus, all,
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 13 August 2014 14:01, Helmut Raiger wrote:
>> On 08/05/2014 02:32 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Fabio,
>>>
>>> On 5 August 2014 14:28, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Magnus,
>>> I would expect Helmut t
Christian,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Christian Riesch
wrote:
> Benoît,
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>> Commit 41623c9 'arm: move exception handling out of start.S files' missed
>> some
>> linker scripts. He
Commit 41623c9 'arm: move exception handling out of start.S files' missed some
linker scripts. Hence, some boards no longer had exception handling linked since
this commit. Restore the original behavior by adding the .vectors section to
these linker scripts.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Théb
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Christian Riesch
wrote:
> Benoît,
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Christian Riesch
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
>>&
Hi Fabio,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 07:10:02 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>>> mx6 is an armv7 which has 64-byte cacheline size.
>>>
>>> Without this fix we are not able to get the FEC
Hi Helmut, all,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:55 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>> On 13 August 2014 14:01, Helmut Raiger wrote:
>>> On 08/05/2014 02:32 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
>>>> I would expect Helmut to create
definition of
the _start symbol after the CONFIG_SYS_DV_NOR_BOOT_CFG word. This new
commit fixes this issue by restoring the original behavior, i.e. by
defining the _start symbol before the CONFIG_SYS_DV_NOR_BOOT_CFG word.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Albert Aribaud
Cc: Manfred Rudigie
he boot of mx31pdk
and tx25.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Reported-by: Helmut Raiger
Cc: Albert Aribaud
Cc: Magnus Lilja
Cc: John Rigby
---
arch/arm/lib/vectors.S |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/vectors.S b/arch/arm/lib/vectors.S
ind
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Some boards, like mx31pdk and tx25, require the beginning of the SPL
> code to be position-independent. For these two boards, this is because
> they use the i.MX external NAND boot, which starts by executing the
> first NAN
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau
wrote:
> Some boards, like mx31pdk and tx25, require the beginning of the SPL
> code to be position-independent. For these two boards, this is because
> they use the i.MX external NAND boot, which starts by executing the
> first NAN
Hi Magnus,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Magnus Lilja wrote:
> On 3 September 2014 03:13, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:53:17AM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>>> > IMHO, the 'b reset' and the 'nop nop nop' are two different issue
This patch forces the correct alignment for DMA operations of buffers used by
part_mac.c.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
{u-boot.orig => u-boot}/disk/part_mac.c | 68 +++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --gi
Hi all,
Has anyone tested i.MX25 or i.MX35 with dcache on?
I'm working with U-Boot 2012.04.01 on several custom platforms using these
processors.
With dcache off, everything works fine, but slowly.
With dcache on, it's much faster (e.g. mtest), but it's impossible to read
files through the eSDH
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:28:03PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Shouldn't the MMC/eSDHC drivers flush/invalidate the dcache ranges
> that they use
> for DMA operations? Not doing so would explain why stack-allocated
> buffers are
> more affected than buffers in unused R
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 08:56:35AM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> On 15.07.2012 00:08, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:28:03PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> >> Shouldn't the MMC/eSDHC drivers flush/invalidate the dcache ranges
> >> that they
On 15/07/2012 15:45, Stefano Babic wrote:
> On 14/07/2012 23:28, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > Has anyone tested i.MX25 or i.MX35 with dcache on?
> >
> > I'm working with U-Boot 2012.04.01 on several custom platforms
>
Fix comment within comment build error.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Joe Hershberger
---
.../net/link_local.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/net/link_local.c u-boot-66714b1/net/link_local.c
Fix NetSetState function name used with CONFIG_BOOTP_MAY_FAIL.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Joe Hershberger
---
.../net/bootp.c|2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/net/bootp.c u-boot-66714b1/net
, and it fixes the
interpretation of its return value by other functions. The chosen naming is the
same as for ARM926EJ-S in order to be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Albert Aribaud
---
.../arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/cpu.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions
Hi all,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:30:22AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Dirk Behme,
>
> > On 15.07.2012 00:08, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 11:28:03PM +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau
> > > wrote:
> > >> Shouldn't th
that, but there has been no need for it so far.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Joe Hershberger
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
.../drivers/net/fec_mxc.c |8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/drivers/net/fec_mxc
The MDC signal is available on all xMII (i.e. 'not 7-wire') interfaces, so
mii_speed has to be set for all these interfaces, and not only for MII.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Joe Hershberger
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
.../drivers/net/fec_mxc.c |2
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Marek Vasut
Cc: Ilya Yanok
Cc: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
---
.../drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c|4 ++--
.../drivers/usb/host/ehci.h| 11 ++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git u
more
than 100 kB for a transfer length of 65535 packets of 512 bytes.
Tested on i.MX25 and i.MX35. In my test conditions, the speedup was about 15x
using page-aligned buffers, which is really appreciable when accessing large
files.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Marek Vasut
Cc: Ilya Yanok
Now that the EHCI driver allocates its qTDs from the heap, the MSC driver is
only limited by the SCSI commands it uses.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Marek Vasut
Cc: Ilya Yanok
Cc: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
---
.../common/usb_storage.c | 31
The commit 5dd95cf made the MSC driver EHCI-specific. This patch restores a
basic support of non-EHCI HCDs, like before that commit.
The fallback transfer size is certainly not optimal, but at least it should work
like before.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Marek Vasut
Cc: Ilya Yanok
Cc
Adjust time-out value for the new EHCI mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Marek Vasut
Cc: Ilya Yanok
Cc: Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
---
.../common/usb_storage.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git u-boot-usb-1b4bd0e.orig
startblock must be taken into account in order not to read past the end of the
FAT.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../fs/fat/fat.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/fs/fat
fatlength is not used after this assignment, so it is useless and can be
removed.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../fs/fat/fat.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/fs/fat/fat.c u-boot-66714b1/fs/fat
With the previous code, the remaining prefetched sectors were read again after
each sector. With this patch, each sector is read only once, thus making the
prefetch useful.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../fs/fat/fat.c | 59
With:
fatls mmc 0 /dir/file
dir: regular directory
file: regular file
The previous code read the contents of file as if it were directory entries to
list. This patch refuses to list file contents as if it were a folder.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../fs/fat/fat.c
Add a buffer bouncing mechanism to get_cluster. This can be useful for
misaligned applicative buffers passed through get_contents. This is required for
the following patches in the case of data aligned differently relatively to
buffers and clusters.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang
One call to get_cluster can be factorized with another, so avoid duplicating
code.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../fs/fat/fat.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/fs
read files from a
given position.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../fs/fat/fat.c | 90
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git u-boot-66714b1.orig/fs/fat/fat.c u-boot-66714b1/fs/fat/fat.c
On Friday 20 July 2012 00:44:52 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2012 18:03:06 Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > --- u-boot-66714b1.orig/fs/fat/fat.c
> > +++ u-boot-66714b1/fs/fat/fat.c
> >
> > +__u8 get_contents_vfatname_block[MAX_CLUSTSIZE]
> > + __al
On Friday 20 July 2012 00:48:26 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 19 July 2012 18:02:37 Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > + if ((unsigned long)buffer & (ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN - 1)) {
> > ALLOC_CACHE_ALIGN_BUFFER(__u8, tmpbuf, mydata->sect_size);
> >
> >
more
than 100 kB for a transfer length of 65535 packets of 512 bytes.
Tested on i.MX25 and i.MX35. In my test conditions, the speedup was about 15x
using page-aligned buffers, which is really appreciable when accessing large
files.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Marek Vasut
Cc: Ilya Yanok
On Friday 20 July 2012 13:37:37 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Am 20.07.2012 13:26, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> > + int xfr_bytes = min(left_length,
> > + (QT_BUFFER_CNT * 4096 -
> > +
Remove spaces before opening parentheses in function calls.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2:
- New patch for this version of the series.
.../fs/fat/fat.c | 44 ++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23
startblock must be taken into account in order not to read past the end of the
FAT.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2:
- Patch renumbering because of the new v2 1/8.
- Possible code style changes due to the new v2 1/8.
.../fs/fat/fat.c
fatlength is not used after this assignment, so it is useless and can be
removed.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2:
- Patch renumbering because of the new v2 1/8.
- Possible code style changes due to the new v2 1/8.
.../fs/fat/fat.c
With the previous code, the remaining prefetched sectors were read again after
each sector. With this patch, each sector is read only once, thus making the
prefetch useful.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2:
- Patch renumbering because of the new v2 1/8
With:
fatls mmc 0 /dir/file
dir: regular directory
file: regular file
The previous code read the contents of file as if it were directory entries to
list. This patch refuses to list file contents as if it were a folder.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2
Add a buffer bouncing mechanism to get_cluster. This can be useful for
misaligned applicative buffers passed through get_contents. This is required for
the following patches in the case of data aligned differently relatively to
buffers and clusters.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang
One call to get_cluster can be factorized with another, so avoid duplicating
code.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2:
- Patch renumbering because of the new v2 1/8.
- Possible code style changes due to the new v2 1/8.
.../fs/fat/fat.c
read files from a
given position.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes for v2:
- Patch renumbering because of the new v2 1/8.
- Possible code style changes due to the new v2 1/8.
- Add missing vairable renaming to fat_write.c.
.../fs/fat/fat.c
Argh, it was 1/8 actually, not 1/9...
- Original Message -
> From: "Benoît Thébaudeau"
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: "Wolfgang Denk" , "Mike Frysinger"
> Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 3:18:44 PM
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] FAT: cosmetic:
Export the MD5 step-by-step API so that it is possible for the lib users to
digest files by chunks. This is especially useful for very large files that
would not fit into the embedded RAM.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../include/u-boot/md5.h
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Friday 20 July 2012 15:44:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Friday 20 July 2012 13:37:37 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> > > Am 20.07.2012 13:26, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> > > > + int
ort the RTC8564,
make this driver compatible with Linux's by giving the opposite meaning to the
century bit.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
.../drivers/rtc/pcf8563.c |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Add support for Freescale's i.MX DryIce RTC, present on i.MX25.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
Cc: Stefano Babic
---
.../drivers/rtc/Makefile |1 +
/dev/null => u-boot-66714b1/drivers/rtc/imxdi.c| 224
2 files
On Friday 20 July 2012 16:51:33 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Am 20.07.2012 15:56, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> > Dear Marek Vasut,
> >
> > On Friday 20 July 2012 15:44:01 Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>> On Friday 20 July 2012 13:37:37 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
&g
On Friday 20 July 2012 17:15:13 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Am 20.07.2012 17:03, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> > On Friday 20 July 2012 16:51:33 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> >> Am 20.07.2012 15:56, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> >>> Dear Marek Vasut,
> >>
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 07:35:30AM, Duan Fugang-B38611 wrote:
> The changes is reasonable. Thanks!
>
> Best Regards,
> Andy
The change for MII_MODE is clear.
As to FCE, this can be discussed, and it depends on the hardware support.
Actually, fec_open enables full-duplex in TCR regardle
On Monday 23 July 2012 15:35:25 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Am 20.07.2012 17:35, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> > On Friday 20 July 2012 17:15:13 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> >> Am 20.07.2012 17:03, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> >>> On Friday 20 July 2012 16:51:3
Hi Andy,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 04:11:22AM, Duan Fugang-B38611 wrote:
> With flow control (FCE) feature, it depends on the hardware support.
> I.MX serial Ethernet ip (FEC, enet) can support the features, and it
> don't need to enable flow control in 100Mbps transition in fact.
> As our test resu
Hi Jim,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:20:48 PM, Jim Shimer wrote:
> I'm seeing a 5ms delay in usb_stor_BBB_transport, which occurs every
> 10K of
> data for fatload usb or 500ms of delay per 1MB of image size. This
> adds up
> to quite a bit of delay if you're loading a large ramdisk.
>
> Does anyo
5. In my test conditions, the speedup was
> > about
> > 15x using page-aligned buffers, which is really appreciable when
> > accessing
> > large files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> > Cc: Marek Vasut
> > Cc: Ilya Yanok
> > Cc: St
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:55:38 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > The commit 5dd95cf made the MSC driver EHCI-specific. This patch
> > restores a
> > basic support of non-EHCI HCDs, like before that commit.
> >
> > The fallback transfer size is certainly not optimal, but at least
> > it sho
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:56:50 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Adjust time-out value for the new EHCI mechanism.
> >
> [...]
>
> Ok, I really like this set.
Nice to read.
> I believe it's only one or two reposts
> away from
> upstream and I'd love to have it in next release (not this
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 02:59:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:20:48 PM, Jim Shimer wrote:
> > > I'm seeing a 5ms delay in usb_stor_BBB_transport, which occurs
> > > every
> > > 10K of
> > > data for fatload usb or 500ms of delay per 1MB of imag
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Do you think
> > using PAGE_SIZE from would be fine since these
> > 4096 are
> > nothing more than page sizes?
>
> Isn't that intel-specific?
I don't know. The code does not say so. What is sure is that page sizes should
be
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:07:01 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > + qtd = memalign(USB_DMA_MINALIGN, qtd_count * sizeof(struct qTD));
> > + if (qtd == NULL) {
> > + printf("unable to allocate TDs\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > memset(qh, 0, sizeof(struc
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:09:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Your suggestion is interesting and might be a complement to my
> > > > series. I
> > > > don't have time to check its correctness right now, but I'll
> > > > try
> > > > soon.
> > >
> > > Will you two have time to
Dear Mike,
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 07:23:57 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger
If it's ack'ed, why does nobody apply it? What is the normal life cycle of
patches like these that don't have a custodian?
Regards,
Benoît
___
U-Boot mail
Dear Stefan,
Sorry for the delay. I'm very busy, and there is much to tell on this topic.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:02:00 PM, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> Am 23.07.2012 19:15, schrieb Benoît Thébaudeau:
> > On Monday 23 July 2012 15:35:25 Stefan Herbrechtsmeier wrote:
> &g
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:13:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > + token = (toggle << 31) |
> > > > > + (xfr_bytes <&
Dear Marek,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 07:44:04 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > I did see a flags field but thought having a new one was
> > conservative (I
> > had no real reason to have a new field). As for the typecasts I
> > was
> > following the API which tests for device ready (Monkey See Monkey
>
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 03:40:32 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:13:45 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:01:11 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > >
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:38:54 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > > Can you explain where this gain would come from? In both cases,
> > > > the
> > > > data in USB
> > > > transfers would be organized in the same way, and it would be
> > > > accessed in memory
> > > > also
Dear Daniel,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 01:17:07 PM, Daniel Gachet wrote:
> The mxc_nand driver uses the symmetric mode to access the NAND Flash,
> but the
> devices populated on the KARO TX25 only support ann asymmetic mode
> (MX25: bit 8 within NAND_FLAHS_CONFIG1 register cleared).
>
> This patch e
Dear Daniel, Scott,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 01:28:08 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 01:17:07 PM, Daniel Gachet wrote:
> > The mxc_nand driver uses the symmetric mode to access the NAND
> > Flash,
> > but the
> > devices populated on the KARO TX25
Dear Daniel, Scott,
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 03:55:51 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 01:28:08 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 01:17:07 PM, Daniel Gachet wrote:
> > > The mxc_nand driver uses the symmetric mode to access the NAND
>
Dear Marek Vasut,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:06:00 AM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > Marek, what do you think?
> >
> > Had a good evening with the EHCI r10 spec, hope I answered most of
> > your
> > questions.
>
> Yes, thanks.
Sorry again for the del
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:31:03 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> This patch forces the correct alignment for DMA operations of buffers
> used by
> part_mac.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> {u-boot.orig => u-b
1 - 100 of 1107 matches
Mail list logo
