Hi,
according to datasheet for the register TimerXControl
we are supposed to not modify the bits [31:8] and [4]
so we are suppose to read the register and modify only the
others register.
Does this mean i need to resend the earlier patch. Writing 00 to these
bits ( 31:8 4) is
Hi
Hi,
according to datasheet for the register TimerXControl
we are supposed to not modify the bits [31:8] and [4]
so we are suppose to read the register and modify only
the others registers/register/bits/
Does this mean i need to resend the earlier patch. Writing 00
Hi,
I searched the Entire u-boot-1.3.4\ directory for PTV_BIT declaration
couldn't find any.
Rather MPUTIM_PTV_BIT is defined which is the correct declaration.
Below Patch Corrects the declaration of MPUTIM_PTV_MASK bit in both omap1510.h
omap730.h.
Kindly update me if i am wrong.
TIA
Hi,
Hi,
I need few clarification regarding mmc csd structure
declaration. I was taking Atmel mci as reference.
In ProductManualSDCardv2.2.pdf @ page 34
ProdManualSDCardv1.9[1].pdf @ page 39, says
...
...
...
C_SIZE_MULT 3 bit width
ERASE_BLK_EN 1 bit width
SECTOR_SIZE 7
Hi,
So my doubt is, Shouldn't erase_grp_size come before sector size.
No. But sometimes, erase_grp_size just isn't there at all,
and you have a 1-bit flag right before sector_size instead.
Currently, these values aren't actually used by u-boot, but I
guess ideally, we should either
Hi,
Today I download u-boot-1.3.4 and checked drivers\rtc directory with
u-boot-1.3.3\drivers\rtc .
There is change in the files that this patch touches. So I think the same
patch can be applied to u-boot-1.3.4 also.
Kindly update me if any changes is needed
Regards
Gururaja
- According to ARM Dual-Timer Module (SP804) TRM (ARM DDI0271),
-- Timer Value Register @ TIMER Base + 4 is Read-only.
-- Prescale Value (Bits 3-2 of TIMER Control register)
can only be one of 00,01,10. 11 is undefined.
-- CFG_HZ for Versatile board is set to
#define
Hi,
Resend - Subject Corrected. Sorry for the mistake
I searched the Entire u-boot-1.3.4\ directory for PTV_BIT declaration
couldn't find any.
Rather MPUTIM_PTV_BIT is defined which is the correct declaration.
Below Patch Corrects the declaration of MPUTIM_PTV_MASK bit in both omap1510.h
Hi,
Acked-by : Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
Gururaja
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Correct ARM Versatile Timer Initialization
From: Gururaja Hebbar K R [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- According
Hi,
I am using CodeSourcery Arm Toolchain to compile U-boot-1.3.3 for integrator cp
board.
1. I set the proper environment variables (BUILD_DIR, PATH, CROSS_COMPILE)
export PATH=/home/user/project/arm-2007q1/bin:$PATH
export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-linux-gnueabi-
export
Hi,
- memsetup.s is changed/merged to lowlevel_init.S
memsetup.S has a global label memsetup that just returns back to caller
- memsetup global label is changed/merged to lowlevel_init
This label is not called from anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi,
- Correct Improper ulong division. This patch take care of
multiple definition of `__udivsi3' undefined reference to `raise' Error
when compiling [ap/cp]926ejs_config with CodeSourcery arm toolchain
Signed-off-by: Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi,
Any update on this patch. I even checked Linux Source for this define way
back in Linux 2.6.11, same kind of patch was applied.
More info @
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.6/11/include/asm-arm/arch-omap/hardware.h
TIA
Regards
Gururaja
___
Hi,
From: Roman Mashak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot version for a new port
I'm planning to make a port on a ARM926EJ-S based board. What is the
recommended way: take release or GIT version as a base ?
Depends on what processor you are using, atmel at91sam9 series or omap
or ti
Hi,
- CONFIG_INIT_CRITICAL is deprecated
- remove all references to CONFIG_INIT_CRITICAL for ARM based boards
- replace by CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT
Signed-off-by: Gururaja Hebbar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
cpu/arm946es/start.S|6 +++---
cpu/arm_intcm/start.S |2 +-
Hmm,
Interestingly i had sent a patch for the same for both
integrator[ap/cp].
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/46044.
i had sent it to Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Peter Pearse also
to U-Boot user list.
Don't know y it didn't reach there.
Regards
Gururaja
Hi,
From: Roman Mashak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals
Right, that's what I've found in the U-Boot sources. How come
that widely used interrupt controllers like PL19x are not
supported by default?
Thats because Most of the ARM based boards doesnt
Hi,
In U-Boot source tree there are number of drivers with
interrupt service routines running (for example,
$(U_BOOT)/drivers/net/bcm570x.c) as well as various
interrupts related macros (some of them not used thought), if
this is what you mean.
Perhaps these definitions are for future ?
HI,
From: Roman Mashak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] PrimeCell Peripherals
To add a bit to my previous message.
As far as I understood from U-Boot's README, a standalone
mode can and may want to use interrupts -- so it'd reasonable
to have interrupts controllers
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] how can i change u-boot load address?
U wouldnt see mapping the vector on (most) ARM Platforms
because they
use u-boot as secondary bootloader
I don't have reliable statistical
20 matches
Mail list logo
