Re: [PATCH v2] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES

2022-01-14 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 08:41, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:30:29AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > Ping > > > > On 21/11/2021 14.52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > > The build system already automatically looks for and includes an > > > in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when

Re: [PATCH v2] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES

2022-01-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 09:30:29AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > Ping > > On 21/11/2021 14.52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > The build system already automatically looks for and includes an > > in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there > > are some things that are

Re: [PATCH v2] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES

2022-01-14 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
Ping On 21/11/2021 14.52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > The build system already automatically looks for and includes an > in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there > are some things that are awkward to maintain in such an in-tree file, > most notably the metadata

[PATCH v2] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES

2021-11-21 Thread Rasmus Villemoes
The build system already automatically looks for and includes an in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there are some things that are awkward to maintain in such an in-tree file, most notably the metadata associated to public keys used for verified boot. The only