Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 35/50] x86: Don't generate a bootstage report in SPL

[Bin Meng]

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:00 PM Simon Glass  wrote:
>
> This report is normally generated by U-Boot proper. Correct the condition
> here so that it respects the Kconfig options for bootstage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng 
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
>  arch/x86/lib/bootm.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 35/50] x86: Don't generate a bootstage report in SPL

[Simon Glass]

This report is normally generated by U-Boot proper. Correct the condition
here so that it respects the Kconfig options for bootstage.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass 
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng 
---

Changes in v2: None

 arch/x86/lib/bootm.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c b/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
index 832b1f901c6..5443a862ab5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/bootm.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ void bootm_announce_and_cleanup(void)
timestamp_add_now(TS_U_BOOT_START_KERNEL);
 #endif
bootstage_mark_name(BOOTSTAGE_ID_BOOTM_HANDOFF, "start_kernel");
-#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTSTAGE_REPORT
+#if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BOOTSTAGE_REPORT)
bootstage_report();
 #endif
 
-- 
2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot