On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:26:36AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
> tftp_cur_block start with 1 for first block, but tftp_cur_block counter is
> start with zero when block number is rollover. The existing code
> "tftp_cur_block - 1" will cause the block number become -1 in store_block()
> when
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 5:27 AM Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>
> tftp_cur_block start with 1 for first block, but tftp_cur_block counter is
> start with zero when block number is rollover. The existing code
> "tftp_cur_block - 1" will cause the block number become -1 in store_block()
> when tftp_cur_block
2 matches
Mail list logo
