Re: [PATCH 5/6] Makefile: tune the include order

Peng, On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:07 AM Sumit Garg wrote: > That's the real reason why we should try to migrate to OF_UPSTREAM at > SoC level rather than at board level. If a particular board isn't > supported upstream then they can opt out for the time being. All the imx93 boards in U-Boot are

Re: [PATCH 5/6] Makefile: tune the include order

On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 19:01, Peng Fan wrote: > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Makefile: tune the include order > > > > Hi Peng, > > > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:41, Peng Fan (OSS) > > wrote: > > > > > > From: Peng Fan > > > &

RE: [PATCH 5/6] Makefile: tune the include order

> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] Makefile: tune the include order > > Hi Peng, > > On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:41, Peng Fan (OSS) > wrote: > > > > From: Peng Fan > > > > For OF_UPSTREAM support, the U-Boot headers under dt-bindings/ maybe > > differ

Re: [PATCH 5/6] Makefile: tune the include order

Hi Peng, On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:41, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote: > > From: Peng Fan > > For OF_UPSTREAM support, the U-Boot headers under dt-bindings/ maybe > different with OF_UPSTREAM headers. So let OF_UPSTREAM headers be > included first when migrating to OF_UPSTREAM. No, please don't do that.