On 23/05/2022 17:10, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 06:28:44AM +, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
>>>
>>> Why are you mentioning LTO in the commit message? When I read the
>>> comm
On 22/05/2022 17:50, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 04:56:08PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
>> It looks like we should be able to change things in common/spl/spl.c to:
>>
>> #if CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(BINMAN_SYMBOLS)
>> /* See spl.h for information about this */
>>
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 06:28:44AM +, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
> >
> > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:33:56AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
> &
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:33:56AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:10:40PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
>
> On 21/05/2022 15:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:33:56AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
> >>>
> >>> On F
On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 04:56:08PM +0300, Alper Nebi Yasak wrote:
> On 21/05/2022 15:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:33:56AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
> >>>
> >>> On Fr
On 21/05/2022 15:05, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:33:56AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:10:40PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>>>
>>>> From:
On 20/05/2022 17:10, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> set the symbol as weak not work if LTO is enabled. Since u_boot_any is
> only used on X86 for now, so guard it with X86, otherwise build break
> if we use BINMAN_SYMBOLS on i.MX.
>
> Tested-by: Tim Harvey #imx8m[m,n,p]-venice
>
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 08:33:56AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
> >
> > On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:10:40PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> >
> > > From: Peng Fan
> > >
> > > set t
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 1/8] spl: guard u_boot_any with X86
>
> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:10:40PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
>
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > set the symbol as weak not work if LTO is enabled. Since u_boot_any is
> > only used on X86 for
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:10:40PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> set the symbol as weak not work if LTO is enabled. Since u_boot_any is
> only used on X86 for now, so guard it with X86, otherwise build break
> if we use BINMAN_SYMBOLS on i.MX.
>
> Tested-by: Tim Harvey
11 matches
Mail list logo