Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-11 Thread Tony Dinh
Hi Sumit,

On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 11:24 PM Sumit Garg  wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 09:20, Tony Dinh  wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sumit,
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 4:29 AM Fabio Estevam  wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:15 AM Sumit Garg  wrote:
> > >
> > > > I suppose the earlier reference patch wasn't complete, can you rather
> > > > try its v4 [1] instead?
> > > >
> > > > [1] 
> > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240304121257.3551104-1-sumit.g...@linaro.org/
> > >
> > > This one works, thanks!
> >
> > I'm testing this for a Marvell Armada 385 board (Synology DS116). I'm
> > on the next branch, but  perhaps something is still missing.
> >
> > diff --git a/configs/ds116_defconfig b/configs/ds116_defconfig
> > index 02ddc0e7918..1fbedcf91cf 100644
> > --- a/configs/ds116_defconfig
> > +++ b/configs/ds116_defconfig
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_SPEED=5000
> >  CONFIG_ENV_SIZE=0x1
> >  CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET=0x7E
> >  CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE=0x1
> > -CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="armada-385-synology-ds116"
> > +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
> >  CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x4030
> >  CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL=y
> >  CONFIG_SPL_STACK=0x4002c000
> > @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CONFIG_PCI=y
> >  CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
> >  CONFIG_AHCI=y
> >  CONFIG_BOOTSTD_FULL=y
> > -CONFIG_BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS=y
> >  CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=10
> >  CONFIG_USE_PREBOOT=y
> >  CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_INFO_QUIET=y
> > @@ -57,6 +56,7 @@ CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
> >  CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
> >  CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
> >  
> > CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=spi0.0:1m(u-boot),7040k(kernel),64k(u-boot-env),-(data)"
> > +CONFIG_OF_UPSTREAM=y
> >  CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE=y
> >  CONFIG_SYS_RELOC_GD_ENV_ADDR=y
> >  CONFIG_VERSION_VARIABLE=y
> >
> > # make ds116_defconfig
> >
> > # grep -i ds116 .config
> > CONFIG_SYS_BOARD="ds116"
> > CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME="ds116"
> > CONFIG_TARGET_DS116=y
> > CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
> > CONFIG_IDENT_STRING="\nSynology DS116"
> > CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT="DS116> "
> > CONFIG_OF_LIST="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
> > CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIST="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
> >
> > Built it, and looks like vendor Marvell is missing during the Make
> > file execution.
> >
> > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=dts dtbs
> > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=dts/upstream/src/arm dtbs
> > scripts/Makefile.build:57: dts/upstream/src/arm/Makefile: No such file
> > or directory
>
> As you are building for the 32-bit Arm, you have to add a Makefile
> here [1] similar to this one [2] for arm64.
>
> [1] 
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/tree/next/dts/upstream/src/arm?ref_type=heads
> [2] 
> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/next/dts/upstream/src/arm64/Makefile?ref_type=heads

Thanks! It works great with that Make file.

All the best,
Tony

>
> -Sumit
>
> > make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/upstream/src/arm/Makefile'.  Stop.
> > make[1]: *** [dts/Makefile:54: arch-dtbs] Error 2
> > make: *** [Makefile:1166: dts/dt.dtb] Error 2
> > make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> > make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/u-boot'
> >
> > I also tried Bryan's patch like you've suggested to Fabio. But it
> > seems Bryan's patch was already in the next branch. Did I miss
> > something?
> >
> > All the best ,
> > Tony


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-11 Thread Sumit Garg
Hi Tony,

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 09:20, Tony Dinh  wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 4:29 AM Fabio Estevam  wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:15 AM Sumit Garg  wrote:
> >
> > > I suppose the earlier reference patch wasn't complete, can you rather
> > > try its v4 [1] instead?
> > >
> > > [1] 
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240304121257.3551104-1-sumit.g...@linaro.org/
> >
> > This one works, thanks!
>
> I'm testing this for a Marvell Armada 385 board (Synology DS116). I'm
> on the next branch, but  perhaps something is still missing.
>
> diff --git a/configs/ds116_defconfig b/configs/ds116_defconfig
> index 02ddc0e7918..1fbedcf91cf 100644
> --- a/configs/ds116_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/ds116_defconfig
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_SPEED=5000
>  CONFIG_ENV_SIZE=0x1
>  CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET=0x7E
>  CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE=0x1
> -CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="armada-385-synology-ds116"
> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
>  CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x4030
>  CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL=y
>  CONFIG_SPL_STACK=0x4002c000
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CONFIG_PCI=y
>  CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
>  CONFIG_AHCI=y
>  CONFIG_BOOTSTD_FULL=y
> -CONFIG_BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS=y
>  CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=10
>  CONFIG_USE_PREBOOT=y
>  CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_INFO_QUIET=y
> @@ -57,6 +56,7 @@ CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
>  CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
>  CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
>  
> CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=spi0.0:1m(u-boot),7040k(kernel),64k(u-boot-env),-(data)"
> +CONFIG_OF_UPSTREAM=y
>  CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE=y
>  CONFIG_SYS_RELOC_GD_ENV_ADDR=y
>  CONFIG_VERSION_VARIABLE=y
>
> # make ds116_defconfig
>
> # grep -i ds116 .config
> CONFIG_SYS_BOARD="ds116"
> CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME="ds116"
> CONFIG_TARGET_DS116=y
> CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
> CONFIG_IDENT_STRING="\nSynology DS116"
> CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT="DS116> "
> CONFIG_OF_LIST="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
> CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIST="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
>
> Built it, and looks like vendor Marvell is missing during the Make
> file execution.
>
> make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=dts dtbs
> make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=dts/upstream/src/arm dtbs
> scripts/Makefile.build:57: dts/upstream/src/arm/Makefile: No such file
> or directory

As you are building for the 32-bit Arm, you have to add a Makefile
here [1] similar to this one [2] for arm64.

[1] 
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/tree/next/dts/upstream/src/arm?ref_type=heads
[2] 
https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/next/dts/upstream/src/arm64/Makefile?ref_type=heads

-Sumit

> make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/upstream/src/arm/Makefile'.  Stop.
> make[1]: *** [dts/Makefile:54: arch-dtbs] Error 2
> make: *** [Makefile:1166: dts/dt.dtb] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
> make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/u-boot'
>
> I also tried Bryan's patch like you've suggested to Fabio. But it
> seems Bryan's patch was already in the next branch. Did I miss
> something?
>
> All the best ,
> Tony


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-10 Thread Tony Dinh
Hi Sumit,
Hi Tom,

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 4:29 AM Fabio Estevam  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:15 AM Sumit Garg  wrote:
>
> > I suppose the earlier reference patch wasn't complete, can you rather
> > try its v4 [1] instead?
> >
> > [1] 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240304121257.3551104-1-sumit.g...@linaro.org/
>
> This one works, thanks!

I'm testing this for a Marvell Armada 385 board (Synology DS116). I'm
on the next branch, but  perhaps something is still missing.

diff --git a/configs/ds116_defconfig b/configs/ds116_defconfig
index 02ddc0e7918..1fbedcf91cf 100644
--- a/configs/ds116_defconfig
+++ b/configs/ds116_defconfig
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ CONFIG_SF_DEFAULT_SPEED=5000
 CONFIG_ENV_SIZE=0x1
 CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET=0x7E
 CONFIG_ENV_SECT_SIZE=0x1
-CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="armada-385-synology-ds116"
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
 CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x4030
 CONFIG_SPL_SERIAL=y
 CONFIG_SPL_STACK=0x4002c000
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ CONFIG_PCI=y
 CONFIG_DEBUG_UART=y
 CONFIG_AHCI=y
 CONFIG_BOOTSTD_FULL=y
-CONFIG_BOOTSTD_DEFAULTS=y
 CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=10
 CONFIG_USE_PREBOOT=y
 CONFIG_SYS_CONSOLE_INFO_QUIET=y
@@ -57,6 +56,7 @@ CONFIG_CMD_CACHE=y
 CONFIG_CMD_TIME=y
 CONFIG_CMD_MTDPARTS=y
 
CONFIG_MTDPARTS_DEFAULT="mtdparts=spi0.0:1m(u-boot),7040k(kernel),64k(u-boot-env),-(data)"
+CONFIG_OF_UPSTREAM=y
 CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE=y
 CONFIG_SYS_RELOC_GD_ENV_ADDR=y
 CONFIG_VERSION_VARIABLE=y

# make ds116_defconfig

# grep -i ds116 .config
CONFIG_SYS_BOARD="ds116"
CONFIG_SYS_CONFIG_NAME="ds116"
CONFIG_TARGET_DS116=y
CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
CONFIG_IDENT_STRING="\nSynology DS116"
CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT="DS116> "
CONFIG_OF_LIST="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"
CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIST="marvell/armada-385-synology-ds116"

Built it, and looks like vendor Marvell is missing during the Make
file execution.

make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=dts dtbs
make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=dts/upstream/src/arm dtbs
scripts/Makefile.build:57: dts/upstream/src/arm/Makefile: No such file
or directory
make[2]: *** No rule to make target 'dts/upstream/src/arm/Makefile'.  Stop.
make[1]: *** [dts/Makefile:54: arch-dtbs] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:1166: dts/dt.dtb] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs
make: Leaving directory '/usr/src/u-boot'

I also tried Bryan's patch like you've suggested to Fabio. But it
seems Bryan's patch was already in the next branch. Did I miss
something?

All the best ,
Tony


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:15 AM Sumit Garg  wrote:

> I suppose the earlier reference patch wasn't complete, can you rather
> try its v4 [1] instead?
>
> [1] 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240304121257.3551104-1-sumit.g...@linaro.org/

This one works, thanks!


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-04 Thread Sumit Garg
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 16:54, Fabio Estevam  wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 3:33 AM Sumit Garg  wrote:
>
> > I think you also need Bryan's patch [1] to be incorporated as well.
> > Give it a try and let me know if you still see any further issues.
> >
> > [1] 
> > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240205-am62px-wip-rebasing-v3-11-04cbb42ea...@ti.com/
>
> I applied this patch, but now I get a different error:
>
>   BINMAN  .binman_stamp
> Wrote map file './itb.map' to show errors
> binman: Filename 'freescale/imx8mp-evk.dtb' not found in input path
> (.,.,./board/freescale/imx8mp_evk,arch/arm/dts)
> (cwd='/home/fabio/denx/u-boot')
> make: *** [Makefile:1126: .binman_stamp] Error 1

I suppose the earlier reference patch wasn't complete, can you rather
try its v4 [1] instead?

[1] 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240304121257.3551104-1-sumit.g...@linaro.org/

-Sumit


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-04 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Sumit,

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 3:33 AM Sumit Garg  wrote:

> I think you also need Bryan's patch [1] to be incorporated as well.
> Give it a try and let me know if you still see any further issues.
>
> [1] 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240205-am62px-wip-rebasing-v3-11-04cbb42ea...@ti.com/

I applied this patch, but now I get a different error:

  BINMAN  .binman_stamp
Wrote map file './itb.map' to show errors
binman: Filename 'freescale/imx8mp-evk.dtb' not found in input path
(.,.,./board/freescale/imx8mp_evk,arch/arm/dts)
(cwd='/home/fabio/denx/u-boot')
make: *** [Makefile:1126: .binman_stamp] Error 1


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-03 Thread Sumit Garg
Hi Fabio,

On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 22:20, Fabio Estevam  wrote:
>
> Hi Sumit,
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 9:57 AM Tom Rini  wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:05:56 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >
> > > Changes in v6:
> > > --
> > > - v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
> > > - Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
> > > - Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
> > > - Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.
> > >
> > > [...]
> >
> > Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
>
> I am trying to use OF_UPSTREAM with imx8mp_evk_defconfig:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig
> index 328c3e388051..29d0c5ce6485 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config IMX8M
> select LTO
> select ROM_UNIFIED_SECTIONS
> select ARMV8_CRYPTO
> +   imply OF_UPSTREAM
>
>  config IMX8MQ
> bool
> diff --git a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig b/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
> index 2350d2f409b7..cdf840c683c0 100644
> --- a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
> +++ b/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT=y
>  CONFIG_ENV_SIZE=0x1000
>  CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET=0x40
>  CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y
> -CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="imx8mp-evk"
> +CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="freescale/imx8mp-evk"
>  CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x92
>  CONFIG_TARGET_IMX8MP_EVK=y
>  CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN=524288
>
> I ran "./dts/update-dts-subtree.sh pull v6.8-rc6-dts".
>
> make mrproper
> make imx8mp_evk_defconfig
> make
>
> The dtb is built: dts/upstream/src/arm64/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dtb
>
> but mkimage still looks for the old path:
>
>  MKIMAGE u-boot.img
> ./tools/mkimage: Can't open arch/arm/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dtb: No
> such file or directory
> ./tools/mkimage: failed to build FIT
>
> Any suggestions?

I think you also need Bryan's patch [1] to be incorporated as well.
Give it a try and let me know if you still see any further issues.

[1] 
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20240205-am62px-wip-rebasing-v3-11-04cbb42ea...@ti.com/

-Sumit

>
> Thanks


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-01 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi Sumit,

On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 9:57 AM Tom Rini  wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:05:56 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
>
> > Changes in v6:
> > --
> > - v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
> > - Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
> > - Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
> > - Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!

I am trying to use OF_UPSTREAM with imx8mp_evk_defconfig:

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig
index 328c3e388051..29d0c5ce6485 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/imx8m/Kconfig
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ config IMX8M
select LTO
select ROM_UNIFIED_SECTIONS
select ARMV8_CRYPTO
+   imply OF_UPSTREAM

 config IMX8MQ
bool
diff --git a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig b/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
index 2350d2f409b7..cdf840c683c0 100644
--- a/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
+++ b/configs/imx8mp_evk_defconfig
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ CONFIG_SPL_LIBGENERIC_SUPPORT=y
 CONFIG_ENV_SIZE=0x1000
 CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET=0x40
 CONFIG_DM_GPIO=y
-CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="imx8mp-evk"
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="freescale/imx8mp-evk"
 CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x92
 CONFIG_TARGET_IMX8MP_EVK=y
 CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_LEN=524288

I ran "./dts/update-dts-subtree.sh pull v6.8-rc6-dts".

make mrproper
make imx8mp_evk_defconfig
make

The dtb is built: dts/upstream/src/arm64/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dtb

but mkimage still looks for the old path:

 MKIMAGE u-boot.img
./tools/mkimage: Can't open arch/arm/dts/freescale/imx8mp-evk.dtb: No
such file or directory
./tools/mkimage: failed to build FIT

Any suggestions?

Thanks


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-01 Thread Sumit Garg
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 19:18,  wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2024 14:30, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 18:27, Tom Rini  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:05:56 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> >>
> >>> Changes in v6:
> >>> --
> >>> - v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
> >>> - Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
> >>> - Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
> >>> - Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>
> >> Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Tom and everyone involved with the reviews. I hope we can carry
> > forward from this effort towards a healthy devicetree story for
> > U-Boot.
>
> Thanks Sumit!
>
> I'll try to submit patches for Amlogic GXL & G12A to switch to this!
>

Thanks Neil for your support to be the first volunteer for this
OF_UPSTREAM switch.

-Sumit

> Neil
>
> >
> > -Sumit
> >
> >> --
> >> Tom
> >>
> >>
>


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-01 Thread neil . armstrong

On 01/03/2024 14:30, Sumit Garg wrote:

On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 18:27, Tom Rini  wrote:


On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:05:56 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:


Changes in v6:
--
- v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
- Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
- Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
- Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.

[...]


Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!



Thanks Tom and everyone involved with the reviews. I hope we can carry
forward from this effort towards a healthy devicetree story for
U-Boot.


Thanks Sumit!

I'll try to submit patches for Amlogic GXL & G12A to switch to this!

Neil



-Sumit


--
Tom






Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-01 Thread Sumit Garg
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 18:27, Tom Rini  wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:05:56 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
>
> > Changes in v6:
> > --
> > - v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
> > - Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
> > - Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
> > - Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!
>

Thanks Tom and everyone involved with the reviews. I hope we can carry
forward from this effort towards a healthy devicetree story for
U-Boot.

-Sumit

> --
> Tom
>
>


Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-01 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 15:05:56 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:

> Changes in v6:
> --
> - v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
> - Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
> - Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
> - Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.
> 
> [...]

Applied to u-boot/next, thanks!

-- 
Tom




Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

2024-03-01 Thread Sumit Garg
Hi Tom,

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 15:06, Sumit Garg  wrote:
>
> Changes in v6:
> --
> - v6_dt: https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v6_dt
> - Patch #3: Incorporate fix for sandbox CI failure.
> - Patch #6: Incorporate shell script comments from Marek.
> - Patch #8: Incorporate documentation review comments from Paul.
>

I haven't heard any major feedback/comments for v6. So can you pick up
this series for the U-Boot -next branch? As you may already be aware
that it is a dependency for [1] [2] [3]. Also, we would like to move
all new Qcom platforms to use upstream DT too.

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=396399
[2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=396742
[3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=396992=*

-Sumit

> Changes in v5:
> --
> - Rebased on tip of master (050a9b981d6a835133521b599be3ae189ce70f41)
> - Created v5_dt branch for testing purposes:
>   https://github.com/b49020/u-boot/tree/v5_dt
> - Patch #6: Added support to cherry-pick fixes in subtree update script.
>   Also, used https:// instead of git://.
> - Patch #7: Fixed inappropriate documentation update.
> - Patch #8: Document how to cherry-pick fixes from devicetree-rebasing
>   tree.
>
> Changes in v4:
> --
> - Switched subtree to be imported as dts/upstream sub-directory rather
>   than devicetree-rebasing sub-directory to better suite U-Boot
>   directory structure.
> - Since we now have v6.7-dts tag available now, so switch subtree to
>   that from its beginning.
> - Patch #2: Incorporate build fix to adjust Bindings Makefile rules to
>   old U-Boot Kbuild infrastructure.
> - Patch #3: Incorporate fix to resolve rk3399 migration issue reported
>   by Simon.
> - Patch #4: New patch to reuse upstream DT includes by U-Boot as per
>   Brian's use-case for TI K3 SoCs.
> - Patch #5: Added a note to OF_UPSTREAM Kconfig option.
> - Patch #6: New patch to add script dts/update-dts-subtree.sh as per
>   Rob's comments.
> - Patch #7: Separate patch to align documentation to use Kconfig symbols
>   instead.
> - Patch #8: Clarify subtree uprev schedule as a separate documentation
>   section. Also, fixed documentation typos.
> - Patch #9: Added commit description.
>
> Changes in v3:
> --
> - Patch #4: Minor commit message update
> - Patch #5: Replace CONFIG_* with Kconfig options
> - Patch #7: Dropped Makefile portion and enabled OF_UPSTREAM for SoC
>   instead.
> - Patch #1, #3, #6 and #8: Picked up review tags
>
> Changes in v2:
> --
> - Patch #1: excluded gitab CI config check and added commit description.
> - Patch #3: s/UBOOT_DTSI_LOC/u_boot_dtsi_loc/
> - Patch #4: s/DEVICE_TREE_LOC/dt_dir/ and s/U-boot/U-Boot/
> - Patch #5: s/U-boot/U-Boot/
> - Patch #6 and #7: Picked up review tags
>
> Prerequisite
> 
>
> This patch series requires devicetree-rebasing git repo to be added as a
> subtree to the main U-Boot repo via:
>
> $ git subtree add --prefix dts/upstream \
>   
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git
>  \
>   v6.7-dts --squash
>
> Background
> --
>
> This effort started while I was reviewing patch series corresponding to
> Qcom platforms [1] which was about to import modified devicetree source
> files from Linux kernel. I suppose keeping devicetree files sync with
> Linux kernel without any DT bindings schema validation has been a pain
> for U-Boot SoC/platform maintainers. There has been past discussions
> about a single DT repo but that hasn't come up and Linux kernel remained
> the place where DT source files as well as bindings are placed and
> maintained.
>
> However, Linux kernel DT maintainers proposed [2] for U-Boot to rather
> use devicetree-rebasing repo [3] which is a forked copy from Linux
> kernel for DT source files as well as bindings. It is tagged at every
> Linux kernel major release or intermideate release candidates. So here I
> have tried to reuse that to bring DT bingings compliance as well as a
> standard way to maintain a regular sync of DT source files with Linux
> kernel.
>
> In order to maintain devicetree files sync, U-Boot will maintains a Git
> subtree for devicetee-rebasing repo as `dts/upstream` sub-directory.
> U-Boot will regularly sync `dts/upstream/` subtree whenever the next window
> opens with the next available kernel major release.
> `dts/update-dts-subtree.sh` script provides a wrapper around git subtree
> pull command, usage from the top level U-Boot source tree, run:
>
> $ ./dts/update-dts-subtree.sh pull 
>
> If required it is also possible to cherry-pick fixes from
> devicetree-rebasing tree prior to next sync, usage:
>
> $ ./dts/update-dts-subtree.sh pick 
>
> The RFC/prototype for this series has been discussed with Linux DT
> maintainers as well as U-Boot maintainers here [4]. Now we would like to
> reach out to wider U-Boot community to seek feedback.
>
> [1] 
>