On 1/19/20 8:48 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
[...]
Because, I believe we can both agree that dumping such ad-hoc code
which implements reset in board code is not the right way, esp.
nowadays with all the DM/DT stuff in.
>>>
>>> Alought we still have ocram space, but our SPL is huge now,
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset
> driver for SPL
>
> On 1/17/20 3:33 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Marek,
>
> Hi,
>
> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset
> >> driver for SPL
On 1/17/20 3:33 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi,
>> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset
>> driver for SPL
>>
>> On 1/16/20 3:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>>
>> Hello Peng,
>>
>>>> Subject: [RFC PATCH] imx: i
Hi Marek,
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset
> driver for SPL
>
> On 1/16/20 3:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>
> Hello Peng,
>
> >> Subject: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset
> >> driver for SPL
> >
On 1/16/20 3:21 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hello Peng,
>> Subject: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset driver
>> for SPL
>>
>
> NAK, this will not work on i.MX8MM/N.
>
> Currently sysreset psci is enabled, however psci will not work for SPL,
> because
> SPL boots before BL31.
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] imx: imx8mm-evk/imx8mn-evk: enable sysreset driver
> for SPL
>
NAK, this will not work on i.MX8MM/N.
Currently sysreset psci is enabled, however psci will not work for SPL, because
SPL boots before BL31.
Regards,
Peng.
> Hi,
>
> I have only tested compiling, but if
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 03:50, Claudius Heine wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have only tested compiling, but if the reset in the SPL on i.MX8MM and
> i.MX8MN still works with this patch applied, then we don't need board
> specific 'do_reset' function and special configurations flags for this
> case.
>
> I
7 matches
Mail list logo
