Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] host-tools: use python2 explicitly for shebang
Hi Masahiro, On 28 January 2018 at 21:42, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > 2018-01-29 13:26 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : >> Hi Masahiro, >> >> On 27 January 2018 at 14:28, Masahiro Yamada >> wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> >>> 2018-01-27 0:27 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : Hi Masahiro, On 21 January 2018 at 02:34, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > All of these host tools are apparently written for Python2, > not Python3. > > Use 'python2' in the shebang line according to PEP 394 > (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/). > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- > > I sent some time before figuring out why Patman does not work > on my machine. > > If 'python' points to python3, Patman does not epit any error > message, it just stays silent until it consumes all memory > on the system. > > > scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py | 2 +- > scripts/mailmapper| 2 +- > test/py/test.py | 2 +- > tools/buildman/buildman.py| 2 +- > tools/dtoc/dtoc.py| 2 +- > tools/microcode-tool.py | 2 +- > tools/patman/patman.py| 2 +- > tools/rkmux.py| 2 +- > 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Simon Glass I can repeat that problem. There has been some effort to make patman (in particular) work with python 3. Should we fix the bug? This change will mask it. >>> >>> I do not think this is a bug. >>> >>> If 'python2' is specified in the shebang line, >>> users should not run it under python 3. >> >> I mean the bug that makes patman hang. I thought that patman ran with >> Python 3. It has been converted but apparently does not run. > > > I was misunderstanding. > > I thought patman was expected to work only for python2. > > From the following commits, the intention was > it was compatible both python 2 and python 3. > > commit 2ce7b21e6c98301f9b05daac076db33d498cfbe1 > Author: Paul Burton > Date: Tue Sep 27 16:03:52 2016 +0100 > > patman: Import 'configparser' lower case to be python 3.x safe > > commit ac3fde9394ce90503930026c62ffd94bf7fa09fd > Author: Paul Burton > Date: Tue Sep 27 16:03:51 2016 +0100 > > patman: Make exception handling python 3.x safe > > commit a920a17b2f418535870788ae81234dc6b8aa6661 > Author: Paul Burton > Date: Tue Sep 27 16:03:50 2016 +0100 > > patman: Make print statements python 3.x safe > > > > Anybody who has ever tested it really on python 3? I did think that it worked at one point, but I am not sure. Regards, Simon ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] host-tools: use python2 explicitly for shebang
2018-01-29 13:26 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : > Hi Masahiro, > > On 27 January 2018 at 14:28, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> Hi Simon, >> >> >> 2018-01-27 0:27 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : >>> Hi Masahiro, >>> >>> On 21 January 2018 at 02:34, Masahiro Yamada >>> wrote: All of these host tools are apparently written for Python2, not Python3. Use 'python2' in the shebang line according to PEP 394 (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/). Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- I sent some time before figuring out why Patman does not work on my machine. If 'python' points to python3, Patman does not epit any error message, it just stays silent until it consumes all memory on the system. scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py | 2 +- scripts/mailmapper| 2 +- test/py/test.py | 2 +- tools/buildman/buildman.py| 2 +- tools/dtoc/dtoc.py| 2 +- tools/microcode-tool.py | 2 +- tools/patman/patman.py| 2 +- tools/rkmux.py| 2 +- 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass >>> >>> I can repeat that problem. There has been some effort to make patman >>> (in particular) work with python 3. Should we fix the bug? This change >>> will mask it. >>> >> >> I do not think this is a bug. >> >> If 'python2' is specified in the shebang line, >> users should not run it under python 3. > > I mean the bug that makes patman hang. I thought that patman ran with > Python 3. It has been converted but apparently does not run. I was misunderstanding. I thought patman was expected to work only for python2. From the following commits, the intention was it was compatible both python 2 and python 3. commit 2ce7b21e6c98301f9b05daac076db33d498cfbe1 Author: Paul Burton Date: Tue Sep 27 16:03:52 2016 +0100 patman: Import 'configparser' lower case to be python 3.x safe commit ac3fde9394ce90503930026c62ffd94bf7fa09fd Author: Paul Burton Date: Tue Sep 27 16:03:51 2016 +0100 patman: Make exception handling python 3.x safe commit a920a17b2f418535870788ae81234dc6b8aa6661 Author: Paul Burton Date: Tue Sep 27 16:03:50 2016 +0100 patman: Make print statements python 3.x safe Anybody who has ever tested it really on python 3? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] host-tools: use python2 explicitly for shebang
Hi Masahiro, On 27 January 2018 at 14:28, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > 2018-01-27 0:27 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : >> Hi Masahiro, >> >> On 21 January 2018 at 02:34, Masahiro Yamada >> wrote: >>> All of these host tools are apparently written for Python2, >>> not Python3. >>> >>> Use 'python2' in the shebang line according to PEP 394 >>> (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada >>> --- >>> >>> I sent some time before figuring out why Patman does not work >>> on my machine. >>> >>> If 'python' points to python3, Patman does not epit any error >>> message, it just stays silent until it consumes all memory >>> on the system. >>> >>> >>> scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py | 2 +- >>> scripts/mailmapper| 2 +- >>> test/py/test.py | 2 +- >>> tools/buildman/buildman.py| 2 +- >>> tools/dtoc/dtoc.py| 2 +- >>> tools/microcode-tool.py | 2 +- >>> tools/patman/patman.py| 2 +- >>> tools/rkmux.py| 2 +- >>> 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass >> >> I can repeat that problem. There has been some effort to make patman >> (in particular) work with python 3. Should we fix the bug? This change >> will mask it. >> > > I do not think this is a bug. > > If 'python2' is specified in the shebang line, > users should not run it under python 3. I mean the bug that makes patman hang. I thought that patman ran with Python 3. It has been converted but apparently does not run. > > Python 2 will retire in 2020 > (https://pythonclock.org/), > we need to covert our python scripts > to python 3 at some point in the future. > '2to3' tool is useful, but not perfect. > Then, we will need to take a look into problems > during the conversion. > > Also, I believe we should use python 2 only for existing tools. > New python scripts should be all written in python 3. > (If they are written in python 2, > should be rejected in the review.) That sounds OK to me, but I think we should convert existing tools too. Regards, Simon ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] host-tools: use python2 explicitly for shebang
Hi Simon, 2018-01-27 0:27 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass : > Hi Masahiro, > > On 21 January 2018 at 02:34, Masahiro Yamada > wrote: >> All of these host tools are apparently written for Python2, >> not Python3. >> >> Use 'python2' in the shebang line according to PEP 394 >> (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/). >> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada >> --- >> >> I sent some time before figuring out why Patman does not work >> on my machine. >> >> If 'python' points to python3, Patman does not epit any error >> message, it just stays silent until it consumes all memory >> on the system. >> >> >> scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py | 2 +- >> scripts/mailmapper| 2 +- >> test/py/test.py | 2 +- >> tools/buildman/buildman.py| 2 +- >> tools/dtoc/dtoc.py| 2 +- >> tools/microcode-tool.py | 2 +- >> tools/patman/patman.py| 2 +- >> tools/rkmux.py| 2 +- >> 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass > > I can repeat that problem. There has been some effort to make patman > (in particular) work with python 3. Should we fix the bug? This change > will mask it. > I do not think this is a bug. If 'python2' is specified in the shebang line, users should not run it under python 3. Python 2 will retire in 2020 (https://pythonclock.org/), we need to covert our python scripts to python 3 at some point in the future. '2to3' tool is useful, but not perfect. Then, we will need to take a look into problems during the conversion. Also, I believe we should use python 2 only for existing tools. New python scripts should be all written in python 3. (If they are written in python 2, should be rejected in the review.) -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] host-tools: use python2 explicitly for shebang
Hi Masahiro, On 21 January 2018 at 02:34, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > All of these host tools are apparently written for Python2, > not Python3. > > Use 'python2' in the shebang line according to PEP 394 > (https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/). > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > --- > > I sent some time before figuring out why Patman does not work > on my machine. > > If 'python' points to python3, Patman does not epit any error > message, it just stays silent until it consumes all memory > on the system. > > > scripts/dtc/pylibfdt/setup.py | 2 +- > scripts/mailmapper| 2 +- > test/py/test.py | 2 +- > tools/buildman/buildman.py| 2 +- > tools/dtoc/dtoc.py| 2 +- > tools/microcode-tool.py | 2 +- > tools/patman/patman.py| 2 +- > tools/rkmux.py| 2 +- > 8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Simon Glass I can repeat that problem. There has been some effort to make patman (in particular) work with python 3. Should we fix the bug? This change will mask it. Regards, Simon ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
