Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] image-fit: Fix fit_get_node_from_config semantics

2016-09-21 Thread George McCollister
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Stefan Roese wrote: > On 21.09.2016 17:12, Marek Vasut wrote: >> >> On 09/20/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Burton wrote: >>> >>> Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed >>> fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't >>> ex

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] image-fit: Fix fit_get_node_from_config semantics

2016-09-21 Thread Stefan Roese
On 21.09.2016 17:12, Marek Vasut wrote: On 09/20/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Burton wrote: Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't exist, but didn't change any of its callers which check return values. Notably

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] image-fit: Fix fit_get_node_from_config semantics

2016-09-21 Thread Marek Vasut
On 09/20/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Burton wrote: > Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed > fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't > exist, but didn't change any of its callers which check return values. > Notably it didn't change boot_get_ramdisk,