On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:03:58PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message 201109102249.13368.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
Well we'll have to break this policy. M28EVK machine ID isn't there yet. On
the
other hand, it's here:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
Dear Jason,
In message 20110911120755.gc15...@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
Feel free to add a temporary definition of the ID to your board config
file (to be removed later, when the offical mach-types file has the
needed data.
So I could do this for Dreamplug? What's the best way to
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 02:46:11PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jason,
In message 20110911120755.gc15...@titan.lakedaemon.net you wrote:
Feel free to add a temporary definition of the ID to your board config
file (to be removed later, when the offical mach-types file has the
On Friday, September 09, 2011 05:58:42 PM Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201109091538.05019.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
I suspect you're going to have to trim this back to what is contained
in Linus' tree. Which we do need to catch up to, btw. We have up to
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201109102249.13368.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
Well we'll have to break this policy. M28EVK machine ID isn't there yet. On
the
other hand, it's here:
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/
Which I'd guess is the most up-to-date source.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
This is great, and I'm all for it (since I've been waiting to add
dreamplug, 3550). However, vanilla Linus' HEAD [1] only goes up to
3494... Am I missing
On Friday, September 09, 2011 01:28:15 PM Jason wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
This is great, and I'm all for it (since I've been waiting to add
dreamplug, 3550). However, vanilla
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 09, 2011 01:28:15 PM Jason wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest in Linus's head
This is great, and I'm all for it
On Friday, September 09, 2011 03:16:28 PM Jason wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 09, 2011 01:28:15 PM Jason wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
This commit updates the mach-types based on the latest
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 03:38:04PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 09, 2011 03:16:28 PM Jason wrote:
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:57:36PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On Friday, September 09, 2011 01:28:15 PM Jason wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Marek Vasut
Dear Marek Vasut,
In message 201109091538.05019.marek.va...@gmail.com you wrote:
I suspect you're going to have to trim this back to what is contained in
Linus' tree. Which we do need to catch up to, btw. We have up to 3338.
Will check this issue later.
Policy for updating this file is
11 matches
Mail list logo
