On 11/03/2016 03:21 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/02/2016 03:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/02/2016 05:30 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 11/01/2016 03:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/01/2016
On 11/02/2016 03:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/02/2016 05:30 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2016 03:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/01/2016 09:39 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On
On 11/02/2016 05:30 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/01/2016 03:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2016 09:39 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 11/01/2016 03:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/01/2016
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2016 03:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/01/2016 09:39 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/01/2016 03:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 11/01/2016 04:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On
On 11/01/2016 03:42 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/01/2016 09:39 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/01/2016 03:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 11/01/2016 04:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 10/29/2016 02:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 11/01/2016 09:39 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 11/01/2016 03:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 11/01/2016 04:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/29/2016 02:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut
On 11/01/2016 03:09 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 11/01/2016 04:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/29/2016 02:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh
On 11/01/2016 04:43 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 10/29/2016 02:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 10/10/2016 10:52
On 10/29/2016 02:59 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 10/10/2016 10:52 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This
On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2016 10:52 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA
On 10/18/2016 05:50 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2016 10:52 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/10/2016 10:52 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform
>>> makes
>>> use of the PL330 to transfer
On 10/15/2016 12:10 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 10/10/2016 10:52 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform makes
>> use of the PL330 to transfer zereos to the SDRAM which enables the ECC bit.
>>
>> This is only an RFC because
On 10/15/2016 12:13 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/14/2016 03:08 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/14/2016 02:23 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 10/10/2016 05:52 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> This patchset adds
On 10/14/2016 10:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/14/2016 03:08 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/14/2016 02:23 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 10/10/2016 05:52 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform
On 10/10/2016 10:52 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform makes
> use of the PL330 to transfer zereos to the SDRAM which enables the ECC bit.
>
> This is only an RFC because after rebasing to v2016.11-rc1, I had to revert
> the
On 10/14/2016 03:08 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/2016 02:23 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 10/10/2016 05:52 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform
>>> makes
>>> use of the PL330 to transfer zereos to the
On 10/14/2016 02:23 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 05:52 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi,
>
>> This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform makes
>> use of the PL330 to transfer zereos to the SDRAM which enables the ECC bit.
>
> Is there some
On 10/10/2016 05:52 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> This patchset adds the PL330 DMA driver to U-Boot. The SoCFPGA platform makes
> use of the PL330 to transfer zereos to the SDRAM which enables the ECC bit.
Is there some considerable performance benefit over memset() in this case ?
> This
19 matches
Mail list logo