Hi Wolfgang,
Does anyone out there by chance have a failure case for gcc 4.0.0,
because I can't seem to reproduce the issues others had in the past.
Do you have an up-to-date patch that can be used for such testing?
I just sent an example patch (ppc: Relocation test patch) that others
Dear Peter,
In message 1252426573.6005.253.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote:
Going over the emails and my own testing, it looks the following
versions worked:
...
Thanks for the detailed analysis.
I remember that gcc-3.4.x has always been marked as suspicious in
our tests, so
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:49 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:38 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Someone tried to get proper relocation working a while ago, but ran into
toolchain bugs. Maybe current toolchains are better...
X-ES's board's in U-Boot fully
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 12:16:13 Peter Tyser wrote:
I did some debug on gcc 3.4.3/binutils2.3.4/glibc2.15 which was a known
non-working setup on an MPC8548-based board. I'm 98% sure the the
reason it fails because it doesn't properly generate .fixup sections.
No .fixup sections are
Dear Peter,
In message 1252426573.6005.253.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote:
Going over the emails and my own testing, it looks the following
versions worked:
...
Thanks for the detailed analysis.
I remember that gcc-3.4.x has always been marked as suspicious in
our tests, so for
5 matches
Mail list logo
