Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness

David, I enjoy the multiple responses on the list. Often there is more than one way to skin a cat and that is reflected in the number of answers. Even if not, it is good to know that people are listening and prepared to respond. I would not like to see any changes that discourgage people from

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

For what its worth I agree with Brian. Discussion should be there for all to see rather than relying on someone summarising a whole load of emails to a personal box and missing the very point that someone in Singapore needed to know I pick up all sort of bits and pieces from this list and find

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

Just to throw oil on the fire... This is the technical list.please take this to the community list (very big grin..) Les 3 more days work to go -Original Message- From: Charles Barouch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 06:31 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

1) stops arguments on the relative benefits of a GOTO over a LOOP for the 53rd time. (30 replies on the last one). I'll agree with you here. 2) stops multiple answers clogging bandwidth of everybody on the list. eg. being told how to MAT var = '' 9 times. Let's think this one through a bit

[U2] Bill Clohan/tdm is out of the office.

I will be out of the office starting 12/21/2004 and will not return until 12/27/2004. If this is an emergency, please contact Bill Swyers @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] or Steve Angell @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit

RE: [U2] getting undefined errors when varible look defined (UV/unix)

Will that fill a multidimensional array as well? or just a single dimensional array. I was going to try that next but wasn't sure. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Jordan Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL

Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness

My own redundant contributions may represent a style that is prevelant and cleaning it up may reduce volume. If the first poster asks What's 2+2 and I may know the answer, I reply with '4'. There may be 15 replies from other members with similar answers. Perhaps one solution (and I should take my

SV: [U2] getting undefined errors when varible look defined (UV/unix)

MAT SOME.VAR = '' Will reset _all_ cells in the matrix Best regards and a merry xmas to all on the list Claus Derlien -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af George Gallen Sendt: 21. december 2004 15:09 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: RE: [U2]

Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness

Clif [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:31:17 -0800 Full content. A lot of times watching how someone else is thinking is more instructive than what they are thinking. I wholeheartedly agree! I subscribe only to the digests, in part from being distracted 100 times a day, but

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Logan, David (SST - Adelaide) Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 11:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness Hi Bruce, Your point about the immediate receivers is not really

RE: [U2] getting undefined errors when varible look defined (UV/unix)

I will test this once I can get a chance. My main concern was that the MATing would delay the job, but if it eliminates all the undefined...which no one see's since it's a phantom process and the PH file gets cleared daily. Possibly all the writing of the undefined... to the PH also would delay

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

Perhaps one solution (and I should take my own advice) is to read through the existing responses and only provide a new or unique answer. Thus, the post will get one occurrence of '4' instead of 20. there are still times I reply to the only item in my inbox and then due to list-lag

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

My $0.02 I strongly disagree with this approach. 1) I think you would lose some valuable and useful responses as not all summaries will be posted 2) I like to see the alternative approaches as my particular problem may not be exactly like the one posted, but one of the solutions might well

Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness

Les, You win the prize. PLEASE MOVE THIS TO U2-COMMUNITY. To subscribe to the u2-users or u2-community mailing lists or digest lists, send one or more of the following lines in the BODY (not the subject) of an email addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] subscribe u2-users subscribe

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

I agree with Rich, with an addendum: Hey, simple fix. The low bandwidth users can simply unsubscribe when they don't have any questions, and then subscribe again when they do until they have an answer and then unsubscribe again. And as far as zealots go, that's a poor subject to piggy-back on

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

Les, Many thanks for your reply on this 'useful' discussion. I am new to universe and have subscribed to get a lot of information on what's going on, what you gurus have to say about uv, etc. David, just a comment to you, and I apologize upfront if I seem to be rude: You have started the one big

Re: [U2] The list format and usefulness

I don't mind the volume of u2 email and I agree that bandwidth has nothing to do with anything. I don't read my email until way past 5pm so I tend to get a settled list. Right now it's 1:50 am as I'm returning from this weekly client. When I see the multiple RE:'s I look upstream to see the

RE: [U2] The list format and usefulness

I've always thought it is much preferable to read the unuseful discussions on this list than the many Viagra, ..meds.., complimentary..., Why pay more, Nice women, and other emails I regulary get. :-) Merry XMas. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL