Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
And I did not mean to imply you were advocating that, as I (hopefully) clarified in my reply to David. I'm still having quivers about last week's threads about trying to cut corners by using PE in an "inquiry-only", "depends on the definition of the word 'commercial'", Clintonian-like rationali

RE: [U2] Personnal edition of UD & UV on Linux

2005-03-20 Thread David Jordan
There were some changes that U2 had to make to the way they down load software to confirm to the rest of IBM. We have been promised that the personal editions will become available again for download soon. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P

[U2] Personnal edition of UD & UV on Linux

2005-03-20 Thread Jacques G.
Does IBM still have the personnal editions of Unidata and Universe for Linux available for download off their websites ? I did some searching on their site but did not find a link. __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resource

RE: [U2] Multiprocessor IBM server

2005-03-20 Thread John Jenkins
Mike UniVerse just asks the underlying O/S to run tasks - it doesn't do anything specific itself. So - Any UniVerse process - when runnable - can be run on any available processor at Unix discretion. An individual UniVerse process (like any other single-threaded Unix process) is runnable on a sin

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
I forgot to trim; me bad. Sorry it wasn't clear that I was not trying to reply to the original question. I was adding comment to the implication, most likely *unintended*, in Adrian's second paragraph that the "bad" thing if someone *was* to run PE in a commercial environment would be the lack

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Matthews
I didn't mean use the PE version. I was stating that I've used the PE version on other distros of Linux. What I meant was it would be foolish to run a commercial version of Universe on an unsupported platform. Sorry for the obvious confusion. From: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Lance Jahnke
Don't forget the file size limitations in the PE version. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Sun Mar 20 13:11:42 2005 Subject: RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2 Heh - Clif - You wandered a bit off the question by replying to

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread David Wolverton
Heh - Clif - You wandered a bit off the question by replying to a response to the original question! No one said they *were* going to use PE commercially! Short answer: While you could probably compile PE to run under SuSE as a Proof of Concept that it *would* run, IBM does not offer any of their

Re: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
Using the PE version commercially is a violation of the license, ie. against the law. IBM might choose to have quite a bit to do with it--via their Legal Department. -- Regards, Clif ~~~ W. Clifton Oliver, CCP CLIFTON OLIVER & ASSOCIATES Tel: +1 619 460 5

RE: [U2] UV 10 para Suse 9.2

2005-03-20 Thread Adrian Matthews
Universe (PE version) works on just about every distro of Linux I've tried seemingly without problems. However I would never dream of using it commercially unless it was on a certified platform. Just imagine if it looks ok in testing and then starts having major problems under "Live" load. IBM wou