Re: [U2] [uv] Windows printer setup

2006-03-15 Thread Dianne Ackerman
Thanks everyone for your help!! -Dianne Mike Pflugfelder wrote: Dianne, In your SETPTR statement, if you specify the printer name as a UNC printer (\\server\printer) then yes, you can print to a remote printer on a separate server or workstation. The user that is sending the print job

RE: [U2] [UD] Triggers

2006-03-15 Thread Kevin King
Agreed - I never use the same code for both. The poster just asked if it was possible and it is. Just tweaking the idea, Jeff.. That's all. -Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.PrecisOnline.com --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit

RE: [U2] [UD] Determine path logged on users are in

2006-03-15 Thread Dean.Armbruster
Add a process to the LOGIN paragraph that writes information about that udt process, such as it's path, to a file. That file can be queried to determine all paths. Don't forget to add something to the LOGOUT paragraph to remove that information so that the file is always current.

[U2] Strange UDT Problem

2006-03-15 Thread kebbon.irwin
UniData 6.0 I have some code that has a number of $INCLUDE lines in it, followed by line that read something like this: IF USER.ID = MYUSER THEN DEBUG followed by the rest of the program. I discovered that in several (but not all) of my UniData accounts, if this code was compiled with the -D

[U2] Re:bci

2006-03-15 Thread Cooper, Rudy
Ray, I'm using a stored procedure with an output parameter. I've used SQLBindCol to execute sql directly, but does it also with stored procedures ? Thx, Rudy Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 22:45:02 +1000 From: Ray Wurlod [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] bci SQLBindParameter is for

[U2] UD telnet server

2006-03-15 Thread Steven Frost
Hi -- we have UDT 6.1.5 running on a Windows 2003 server with a 5 user license but every now and then , usually within a week, the telnet service hangs and no logins are possible. UDT itself is OK. Restarting the UD telnet service fails, so then reboot is called for. Colin Alfke mentioned it

[U2] [UV] Gigabit NIC

2006-03-15 Thread Mike Pflugfelder
Hi all, I remember seeing something in the list a while back about Gigabit NIC cards and Universe but I can't seem to find a reference to it and the search still seems to be down. Does anyone know exactly what the problem is between Universe on Windows and Gigabit NIC cards? I believe that

RE: [U2] [UD] Determine path logged on users are in

2006-03-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Haskett wrote: I'd like to allow some users to list all users logged onto their application (logged into their accounts) then give them the option to log them off. I'm not sure if this is possible in UniData. Any ideas would be appreciated. As always, thanks. :-) On Unix it's easy

[U2] RE: Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread Larry Hiscock
Charles wrote: We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Just one comment on this: After some investigation, at the request of several list members, I did change all of the digest lists' reply-to addresses back to

RE: [U2] Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread Tony Gravagno
We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Are we all happy now that we are used to it? Personally, I think Larry made a good call, but this is a community, so I want me be sure that everyone gets heard. [snip] Thanks

RE: [U2] Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread phil walker
I have noticed that their seems to be less traffic as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 16 March 2006 5:01 p.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Changes to the List We've now been

[U2] Re: [U2C] Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 3/15/06, u2ug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All, We've now been living with the change to the lists for nearly a month. I'd like to invite opinions on the change. Are we all happy now that we are used to it? My opinion hasn't changed. I think reply-to-sender kills discussions and does not

RE: [U2] Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread Bruce Nichol
Goo'day, At 19:30 15/03/06 -0800, Tony Gravagno wrote: Given those numbers, it seems traffic here has dropped by almost half since the change. Whether that's good or bad is up to the individual, but anything that (seemingly) cuts community traffic by this magnitude deserves some evaluation.

RE: [U2] Re: [U2C] Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread Bob Woodward
My two cents agrees with Wendy. BobW -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wendy Smoak Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 8:14 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Re: [U2C] Changes to the List On 3/15/06, u2ug [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [U2] Changes to the List

2006-03-15 Thread Tony Gravagno
Bruce Nichol wrote: How many now know to Reply All if they want a moment of fame on the list? And this is another point. An announcement was made to the list, there was a hullabaloo for a few days and then it blew over. How many people missed that thread and don't know the secret handshake to