RE: [U2] [BB] U2 Enhancement Request - WRITE

2007-05-24 Thread Anthony Youngman
I *think* this is historical. It used to be that ON ERROR didn't exist (I don't think ELSE existed initially!). So I guess that ELSE was added to deal with failed writes but not with file isn't there type problems, then ON ERROR was added to deal with those. I think originally, when even ELSE

RE: [U2] UVODBC port

2007-05-24 Thread Andy Moore
DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that there is no guarantee

[U2] A question of dictionaries.

2007-05-24 Thread Susan Joslyn
Hi Stuart. Yes, modifying a dictionary is an issue. Sarbanes-Oxley is primarily concerned with financial fraud. There are other regulations that are more focused on other things. In the case of SOX if you could modify report output by manipulating a dictionary there is the potential

RE: [U2] A question of dictionaries.

2007-05-24 Thread David Jordan
Hi Stuart Another option is to use the security features in the voc, ie Field 4 of the Voc item. You could restrict who has access to Revise and Editor and could even log what they are doing. Regards David Jordan Managing Consultant --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

RE: [U2] A question of dictionaries.

2007-05-24 Thread Stevenson, Charles
Bottom line, dictionaries should be controlled. Period. I lock the dicts with os-level permissions. Just live wth EVAL restrictions. SQL not used much. For those few cases where EVAL is important: - references a limited copy of the full dictionary where the user can write. - via a 2nd

Re: [U2] A question of dictionaries.

2007-05-24 Thread Susan Lynch
Mark, In my early days of consulting, many years ago, I had a client whose CFO insisted that anything that I wrote that *could* be written in English (UniQuery under its original Microdata name) be written that way, even if it was less efficient, because then if it needed changing when I was

[U2] [BB] Enhancement - WRITE

2007-05-24 Thread Susan Joslyn
Well, gang . I think that the U2's should be smarter about reporting what file can't write and WHY and also failing more gracefully than a SPLAT to TCL. Nevertheless, since IBM is not interested in my idea now that I'm on a PE edition and y'all didn't jump all over the idea - I'll go revamp all

Re: [U2] A question of dictionaries.

2007-05-24 Thread john reid
I have a feeling that this one could go on a bit. Far be it for me to break the chain... We have separate accounts that exist solely for the purpose of users who have tcl access. Within those accounts, is a minimum of potentially damage causing verbs. But, if security is a BIG priority, the

Re: [U2] [BB] Enhancement - WRITE

2007-05-24 Thread karlp
If you do a STATUS [not to be confused with STATUS()] on a file, you can check read-write permissions, as well as uid/gid. type this at TCL: HELP BASIC STATUS which will give you both Windows and Unix help. HTH, Karl quote who=Susan Joslyn Well, gang . I think that the U2's should be