From: Ray Wurlod
> Just out of curiosity, because EXECUTE is (may be) handled
> differently, what is the account flavor in each case?
> And have you set any compiler options such as EXEC.EQ.PERFORM ?
Primarilly tested in Pick-flavoured account, but IDEAL, too.
I've tried
$OPTIONS EXEC.EQ.PE
Just out of curiosity, because EXECUTE is (may be) handled differently, what is
the account flavor in each case? And have you set any compiler options such as
EXEC.EQ.PERFORM ?
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Since we'll be moving our production server to Itanium, etc., in the next new
months, we'll be very interested to learn the circumstances that cause the
problem, etc.
Thanks!
Richard
--- On Wed 03/19, Stevenson, Charles < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
From: Stevenson, Charles [mailto: [EMAIL PRO
And you'll want to read the DeveloperWorks article on just this topic to
boot...
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0612xia/
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19
Thanks Rex. Just wanted to make sure the software police don't come and
get me.
>>No, you're not violating licensing by moving the icsdk to another
>>machine; the "server program" mentioned in the licensing is the unirpc
>>daemon.
Charles Shaffer
Senior Analyst
NTN-Bower Corporation
---
u
Charles,
No, you're not violating licensing by moving the icsdk to another
machine; the "server program" mentioned in the licensing is the unirpc
daemon.
If you haven't already read it, PickWiki.com has a page discussing U2
<-> PHP access:
http://www.pickwiki.com/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Accessing_
I hear IBM was finally able to reproduce my problem. I don't know any
other details yet.
After I learn more, maybe I'll come back at you, Richard, and ask to
compare our 2 systems's configurations.
Thanks,
cds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Charles,
One of the guys in our shop tested this on one of our machines (HP Itanium,
HPUX 11.23, UV 10.2.6) and couln't see any problem.
He ran this code for 3,572,053 iterations with no increase in memory (not even
a byte):
0001: CNT = 0
0002: LOOP
0003: CNT +=1
0004: CRT OCONV(CNT, "MR0,
I am looking into developing a PHP driver for Unidata using Intercall. In
the InterCall Developer's Guide when it refers to the Intercall
libraries, it states
"You can make as many copies as you want of the client part of InterCall
without further payment.
You may not copy or redistribute th
