[U2] [UV] fixtool

2008-05-06 Thread Craig Bennett
Hi All, fixtool allows you to nominate a Diagnostic level between 1 and 10 using -level. Does anyone know what the different levels check? thanks, Craig --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

Re: [U2] Press any k

2008-05-06 Thread MAJ Programming
That's the trouble. It CANNOT be used 'all over the place'. Surely you have names and addresses who's lengths are often not their maximum. Even dates can have today as 5/6 instead of 05/06/08. Money values also cannot be dependent upon consistent lengths. Thus, even though every 6 digit PN can be

RE: [U2] passing file pointers?

2008-05-06 Thread Dennis Bartlett
If unassigned(F.PTR) then open 'f' to F.PTR... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Chanco Sent: 02 May 2008 10:21 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] passing file pointers? Hey all, In universe 10.1 how can I verify

RE: [U2] Press any k

2008-05-06 Thread Brutzman, Bill
It is handled via the prompts... using [square] brackets for standard numbers of digits and triangular brackets for variable length entries. For most users, this takes approx one day to get acclimated. InCorrect entries lead to an error screen with a Beep.Beep.And.Sleep. In all, this method is a

Re: [U2] [UV] fixtool

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
Unless things have changed since February of 2004, according to a white-paper by Leroy Dreyfus: fixtool supports 3 effective verbosity levels. 0  3 are treated as level 2 and show only the summary screen described earlier. Level 4 displays the record offset, the forward pointer, the

RE: [U2] Unidata PE

2008-05-06 Thread Bob Wyatt
Yes, it is. Review the kernel notes from the availability matrix. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Butera Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 14:11 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] Unidata PE Is Unidata available for 64-bit

[U2] UniObject.NET: What are you doing for LOCATE?

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
Greetings again, everyone. Second question, put in a separate e-mail for ease of future searching the list archives. Since there does not appear to be any LOCATE method provided by UniObjects.NET, what are others using? Did you code your own on the VB (or other client language) side? Do a

[U2] UniObjects.NET: .GenerateXML method fails

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
Greetings, List Citizens (Litizens?) A client of mine and I are having problems with using UniObjects.NET and the GenerateXML menthod to populate a data grid in VB.NET. The following code, almost a cut-and-paste from Brian Leach's excellent Introducing UniObject for .NET in the U2UG

Re: [U2] [UV] fixtool

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
That should read 0-3. On May 6, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Clifton Oliver wrote: 0  3 are treated as level 2 --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] UniObjects.NET: .GenerateXML method fails

2008-05-06 Thread Brian Leach
Hi Clif I would check to see whether the GETXMLSUB subroutine has been globally cataloged in the uv account. The code is in BP, it needs to be cataloged as *GETXMLSUB. Brian Greetings, List Citizens (Litizens?) A client of mine and I are having problems with using UniObjects.NET and the

RE: [U2] UniObject.NET: What are you doing for LOCATE?

2008-05-06 Thread Brian Leach
Clif I wrote my own - BUT - now I'm thinking I should recode it as a .NET 3.5 extension method to enhance the UniDynArray class. Which, strangely enough, sounds like a good topic for next month's Spectrum :) Brian Greetings again, everyone. Second question, put in a separate e-mail for

Re: [U2] UniObjects.NET: .GenerateXML method fails

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
Sure enough, that subroutine was not cataloged on the AIX system. I've cataloged it, but got my PC access expired before I could test it. (What are the odds?) I'll report back to the list (for the archives) with a verification when I get my access renewed. Thank you! Regards, Clif On

Re: [U2] UniObject.NET: What are you doing for LOCATE?

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
Indeed it does! Regards, Clif On May 6, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Brian Leach wrote: I wrote my own - BUT - now I'm thinking I should recode it as a .NET 3.5 extension method to enhance the UniDynArray class. Which, strangely enough, sounds like a good topic for next month's Spectrum :)

[U2] Sr. Programmer Position or Contractor - San Diego, CA

2008-05-06 Thread ericro
We have an opening at PETCO in San Diego, California for a Sr. level Universe/multi-value developer. While we are looking for a permanent employee, we do have projects that could be supported by a contract resource as well. Relocation is an option. If you're interested, please send resume and

Re: [U2] [UV] fixtool

2008-05-06 Thread Craig Bennett
Thanks Cliff, I didn't realise they were verbosity levels. So the actual checks performed are the same for every level? --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] UniObject.NET: in a 64 bit environment

2008-05-06 Thread Boydell, Stuart
Has anyone had any experience running UO.Net in a 64 bit environment? We are planning to upgrade some windows SQL servers which are currently running a 32bit exe which use UO.Net to move some data from the UV server. I'm wondering if I'll need to recompile the app or if there are any potential

Re: [U2] Press any k

2008-05-06 Thread MAJ Programming
If your environment has promoted a consistent interface across all programs, then congratulations on the {} and prompting. Unfortunately within all of my client's systems, there rarely appears a consistent interface, thus my perspective on this topic. Even within one set of programs from the

Re: [U2] [UV] fixtool

2008-05-06 Thread Clifton Oliver
That is my understanding. The different levels just change how much and what kind of detail it reported. Regards, Clif On May 6, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Craig Bennett wrote: Thanks Cliff, I didn't realise they were verbosity levels. So the actual checks performed are the same for every level?