Re: [U2] EREPLACE Function

2010-08-24 Thread mats
Linda !  Yes there is a way to negate ANY set of characters for a  convert -  at least if your running ASCII and not unicode: First, make a string that contains all possible characters: ALL = '';  FOR II = 1 TO 256;ALL :=  CHAR(II-1)  ;   NEXT

Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library

2010-08-24 Thread Charles_Shaffer
Yes. Both machines are running XP and both programs were built on XP. The big difference is that one was developed with Visual Basic 5 and the other was developed with VB.NET and VS 2005. The libraries would definitely be different between those two environments. I am just not sure what the

Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library

2010-08-24 Thread Robert Houben
Hi Charles, Native NT dlls expose the entry points to publicly exposed methods in a table. The named methods are mapped to that table. When you link to a method in a dll, the compiler loads the external dll, looks up your method in the table, and actually links to it by the ordinal offset of

[U2] adding UO.NET section to web.config

2010-08-24 Thread Symeon Breen
Hi – there are many examples of setting up uniobjects.net params within the config file, however in asp.net simply putting the UO.NET section in web.config does not compile as it is not a defined section. So I have also added the following     configSections     section name=UO.NET

Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library

2010-08-24 Thread Charles_Shaffer
Hi Robert, Thank you for the explanation. I see what the error means now. All of the copies of the unirpc32.dll that I find have the same date and size. 6/27/2005 45,056 bytes. Here's an odd thing. I've been digging through the dependency list (VB5) and the file list (VB.NET). VB.NET

Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library

2010-08-24 Thread Robert Houben
When loading a dependent dll, the loader also tries to load all statically linked dependent dlls of the dependent dll. What could be happening is that either the unioledb.dll or uniobjects.dll that you are linking to is a different version, and expects to link to a different unirpc32.dll. If

Re: [U2] adding UO.NET section to web.config

2010-08-24 Thread Jacques G.
Hello, I use: configSections sectionGroup name=UO.NET section name=General type=System.Configuration.DictionarySectionHandler/ section name=ConnectionPooling type=System.Configuration.DictionarySectionHandler/ /sectionGroup /configSections

Re: [U2] adding UO.NET section to web.config

2010-08-24 Thread Bill Haskett
Symeon: I take it Jacques' answer was what you needed? Bill Jacques G. said the following on 8/24/2010 9:21 AM: Hello, I use: configSections sectionGroup name=UO.NET section name=General

Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library

2010-08-24 Thread Charles_Shaffer
OK. Turned out to be a really easy fix. I added the two DLLs to the dependency table while making the deployment package. Seems obvious now, except I swear they were never there before. This app has been in use for years and I have modified it a dozen times. This never came up before. I

Re: [U2] Ordinal could not be found in dynamic link library

2010-08-24 Thread Robert Houben
If they were in your path before, everything would have worked. Dependencies have been known to drive programmers crazy. They used to call it dll-hell. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of