I assume you have tried rebuilding the indices?
That usually fixes almost all of our issues with index problems. Otherwise I
would delete the index and
build it back again. If you need any code that we use just ask me and I can
email it to you.
-Chris
> From: jpb-u...@hotmail.com
> To:
Does the correlative have any special coding in it? I would suggest deleting
the index for this field recreate the field as a D type then add the field
to the index again. Some correlatives don't give you what you would expect.
Jerry Banker
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@lists
I have received several of those mystery E-mails as well, plus that attachment.
The attachment has always had the same name but been variable in size, and I
have not opened it.
John Israel
Sr. Programmer/Analyst
Dayton Superior Corporation
721 Richard St.
Dayton, OH 45342
937-866-0711 x44380
-
I just replied to this thread, and noticed something very odd. I got this
message:
mvargh...@silverlinewindow.com - no such user here.
There is no user by that name at this server.
: Message contains [1] file attachments
---
I just replied to this thread, and noticed something very odd. I got this
message:
mvargh...@silverlinewindow.com - no such user here.
There is no user by that name at this server.
: Message contains [1] file attachments
--
I'm still here :) I noticed the same thing though. Wonder if some people
dropped off the mailing list..
-Chris
> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 06:52:26 +0530
> From: anantkum...@gmail.com
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] where did everyone go ?
>
> Same here :-)
>
> Anant
>
Same here :-)
Anant
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
> I'm lurking as usual, nothing to add, lots to learn. 8-)
>
> Brian
>
>
>
> From: "u2ug"
> To:
> Date: 27/09/2010 18:07
> Subject:[U2] where did everyone go ?
> Sent by:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
We've just uncovered a rather unusual and unsettling situation. We have a
file with a single index that has somehow gotten nodes with duplicate keys.
A simple example would be having an index on ZIPCODE in a address database,
and finding that there are _two_ nodes (records) in the index for ZIPCOD
