[U2] [AD] Webinar: Super Easy RESTful Services Generation for MultiValue Databases

2012-10-01 Thread David Peters Bluefinity
Webinar: Super Easy RESTful Services Generation for MultiValue Databases Tuesday, October 2, 2012 The latest release of mv.NET provides what is arguably the simplest yet most powerful and flexible way of creating RESTful web services against a MultiValue database. Developers are now able to

[U2] STARTUP file issue with UV11.1 PE version (Linux)

2012-10-01 Thread doug chanco
I recently downloaded uv 11 and when I went to run STARTUP I got a weird error, upon looking at the STARTUP script I noticed it had a bunch of binary and other junk at the beginning of the file, I removed all the extra stuff, saved the file and it ran just fine. Has anyone else seen this? I

Re: [U2] STARTUP file issue with UV11.1 PE version (Linux)

2012-10-01 Thread Brian Leach
Doug Have you remembered that STARTUP is a cpio archive? # cpio -uvcdumB uv.load STARTUP ./uv.load -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of doug chanco Sent: 01 October 2012 17:37 To: U2 Users List

Re: [U2] STARTUP file issue with UV11.1 PE version (Linux)

2012-10-01 Thread doug chanco
No sir, I did not know that, why would they cpio it anyway? Not that it matters I was just curious, anyway thanks for the info. Dougc -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Brian Leach Sent: Monday,

[U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread Wjhonson
What's the largest dataset in the Universe user world? In terms of number of records. I'm wondering if we have any potential for utilities that map-reduce. I suppose you would spawn phantoms but how do they communicate back to the master node? ___

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread u2ug
pipes -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wjhonson Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 4:05 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe What's the largest dataset

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread George Gallen
The only thing about a pipe is that once it's closed, I believe it has to be re-opened by both Ends again. So if point a opens one end, and point b opens the other end, once either end closes, It closes for both sides, and both sides would have to reopen again to use. To eliminate this, you

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread George Gallen
0001: OPENSEQ /tmp/pipetest TO F.PIPE ELSE STOP NO PIPE 0002: LOOP 0003:READSEQ LINE FROM F.PIPE ELSE CONTINUE 0004:PRINT LINE 0005: REPEAT 0006: STOP 0007: END Although, not sure if you might need to sleep a litte between the READSEQ's ELSE and CONTINUE Might suck up cpu time when

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread David Wolverton
So how would a user 'chop up' a file for parallel processing? Ideally, if here was a Mod 10001 file (or whatever) it would seem like it would be 'ideal' to assign 2000 groups to 5 phantoms -- but I don't know how 'start a BASIC select at Group 2001 or 4001' ... -Original Message- From:

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread Robert Houben
Create an index on a dict pointing at the first character of the key, and have each phantom take two digits. (0-1, 2-3, 4-5, 6-7, 8-9) -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent:

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread David Wolverton
OK - I was trying to create a 'smoother use' of the disk and 'read ahead' -- this example the disk would be chattering from the heads moving all over the place. I was trying to find a way to make this process more 'orderly' -- is there one? -Original Message- From:

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread Wjhonson
The GROUP.STAT.DETAIL command will tell you the keys, in stored order, in each group of a hashed file. -Original Message- From: David Wolverton dwolv...@flash.net To: 'U2 Users List' u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Mon, Oct 1, 2012 3:47 pm Subject: Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread u2ug
True - but why would you want it any other way ? Once one end closes it - process is complete -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of George Gallen Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 4:16 PM To: U2 Users List

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread David Taylor
Or, let's suppose you wanted to process repetitive segments of one very large record using the same logic in a separate phantom process for each segment, how large a record can be read and processed in Universe? Dave So how would a user 'chop up' a file for parallel processing? Ideally, if

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe

2012-10-01 Thread Ross Ferris
If the file were big enough, and already had part files, then I believe that you could have a phantom process each of the individual parts. Failing that, get an SSD relatively cheap, and will give your processing a reasonable kick along!! Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage Better by

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe (Unclassified)

2012-10-01 Thread HENDERSON MIKE, MR
I have often thought about this - mostly in an idle moment or as a displacement activity for something less amusing that I ought to be doing. ;-) First of all, Universe is already extremely parallel: there's a separate O/S thread for each TTY and for each phantom, and you can't get more parallel

Re: [U2] [u2] Parallel processing in Universe (Unclassified)

2012-10-01 Thread Ross Ferris
Interestingly I'm currently trying to find a definitive answer/correlation between clock speed performance on a single core/thread on Intel CPU's to confirm, or deny, that for grunt batch work if a 4C Intel running @ 3.4Ghz will actually be faster than an 8C running @ 2.7Ghz -- the answer