I'm testing some XML stuff locally on UV PE 11.2 and I've run into a problem I
can't figure out. I hope someone else knows what's going on here and has a
work-around.
I'm running this test on CentOS 6.5 with UniVerse PE 11.2. I get a core dump
as soon as I attempt the XMAPOpen. It appears
UniVerse.
I want to create a dictionary item that extract value 178,1
I thought
1. I
2. EXTRACT(@RECORD,178,1,0)
3. .
4. .
5. 1L
6. S
Would do but it does not give me the desired result. Any suggestions?
Problem solved. It was the version of the Universe and the version of the
UO.Net.
Once I installed an older version the connection succeeded.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Martin Scholl
In line 2 put @RECORD178,1
Regards
JLGP
-Mensaje original-
De: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] En nombre de Martin Scholl
Enviado el: martes, 4 de febrero de 2014 01:33 p. m.
Para: U2 Users List
Asunto: [U2] UniVerse Dictionary queston
Martin:
This is the only way to do accomplish the defined task in UniData.
Maybe @RECORD178,1 is the preferred method in UV.
Bill
Untitled Page
- Original Message -
*From:* msch...@martinscholl.com
*To:* U2
Just to make sure, you're wanting FIELD 178 and the first value of that
field. Correct? Because you have a length of 1, left justified I want
to make sure you're not looking for the first character of the 178th
field. Maybe if you showed what you're wanting and what you're getting,
instead,
What are the periods in 3 and 4 for?
Did you try removing those?
-Original Message-
From: Woodward, Bob bob_woodw...@k2sports.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Tue, Feb 4, 2014 11:49 am
Subject: Re: [U2] UniVerse Dictionary question
Just to make sure, you're
Another option to this would be to define field 178 in one dictionary
@ID=ITEMWHOLE
D
178
DESCRIPTION
1L
S
And then
@ID=ITEMPART
I
ITEMWHOLE ; @11,1
PIECEofITEM
1L
S
This way if you ever move where the ITEM is stored, just change the D Item. BUT
You might still
Have to recompile the I