unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "U2 Users Digest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 11:29 AM
Subject: U2 Users Digest V1 #1715
U2 Users Digest Wednesday, June 27 2007 Volume 01 : Number
1715
In this issue:
Re: [U2] UD Backups
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:26:02 -0500
From: Doug Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [U2] UD Backups
At 11:29 AM 6/26/2007, you wrote:
I've been testing NTBackup recently. There are some significant
time delays in backuping up a UD system vs a plain Windows system.
One thing to look at is the size of data prior to backup, IE the size
of the data source, not the size of the resultant backup image
file. This is because if you know anything about hashed files and
how they compress, it is not uncommon to be able to compress most
hashed files to be only 20% of the original space it took on
disk. That being said, your backup software is still going to need
to scan all that data regardless if there are records there or
not. So if your original data set is much larger on the U2 side,
this would probably (in theory) explain the difference.
I would also download a benchmark utility to test your disks to rule
that out as being a problem as well.
Doug Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager of Technical Services
Strategy 7 Dallas TX
------------------------------
End of U2 Users Digest V1 #1715
*******************************
------------
u2-users-digest mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
