.
LISTing to LPTR seems to work fine and printing from bash works fine.
Has anyone else encountered this problem before?
TIA,
Brian Grayson
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Hi,
When running PORT.STATUS, I sometimes see output like the following:
PORT.STATUS USER fl1208
27900 fl1208 101 /dev/pts/80 SH NAME [ SOME.PROGRAM @ 0x84]
To what is '0x84' reffering?
Thanks,
Brian Grayson
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Amen.
I know it's mostly a 'legacy' thing, but I hate seeing interface-specific
formatting considerations contained in the processing logic.
Brian Grayson
Tony Gravagno wrote:
that's one of the benefits of modularization and
exposing code as UI-independent rules, which is after all what
Hi,
I don't see that you're passing any arguments. Assuming that you are in fact
connecting, try:
SQL = CALL MYSUB ('ARG1','ARG2');
IMHO, the UV docs really should contain an example for every definition.
Brian Grayson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian,
This is exactly what I wantto do
Hi Pankaj,
Try:
UNLOCK ALL
to remove all locks.
Try:
HELP UNLOCK
to learn about the UNLOCK command.
Brian Grayson
Pankaj Gupta04 wrote:
Hi All,
I am facing a strange problem with the locks. When I executed LIST.LOCKS
at universe prompt, no locks were shown but when I executed LIST.READU
Hi Martin,
I agree. Personally, I always use UNLOCK USER [userno] [option].
The poster stated:
I tried to CLEAR all the locks but was not able to do that.
The poster seemed to state that he wished to clear all locks.
Brian Grayson
Martin Phillips wrote:
Try:
UNLOCK ALL
to remove all
Hi Joe,
You can download Windows Services for Unix 3.5 here:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/sfu/default.mspx
Brian Grayson
Joe Walter wrote:
Thanks Colin.
That sounds like a good approach - creating windows verions of the unix
commands
that is.
I might be able to pull
.
Brian Grayson
Ed Clark wrote:
As a curiosity, how many people have used universe gci or the unidata
equivalent with CALLC/CallBasic to extend the capabilities of U2? When I see
comments like the one below (suggesting that only newer versions of U2 let
you use sockets) I always wonder about
