Unsubscribe * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you,
Chris Louis Asset Management Outsourcing, Inc. 5655 Peachtree Parkway, Suite 213 Norcross, GA 30092 800-893-3501 x 1106 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:56 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] port.status To all. thanks for your suggestions. there was something hincky with aix and universe. server had been setup in July. Universe added at the same time. Then in August, we imported our files. And started getting 'universe will expire in x days'. Which we hadn't been getting before. Sticky bits had been turned on. invalid expiration date could not be resolved by reconfiging universe. both invalid expiration date and port.status were both resolved by a shutdown and restart of aix. About the only thing that was done to the system between initial setup and the conversion, HP Jetdirect drivers were installed into/onto AIX by our aix/os guru. Sorry, don't know exactly what the guru did. but universe seems okay now. We'll just remember to kick the server more often. Again, thanks all. Roger ----- Original Message ----- From: Lloyd Cottrell Date: Thursday, September 4, 2008 11:42 am Subject: Re: [U2] port.status To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > that was my point, easier to remember that +s is that sticky is > easier to > remember or associate with +s. Also, unless i don't understand > what an OS > is, this program (port.status) is not part of the OS but part of > the DB. I > too would not be doing this to an OS program. > > On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:58 AM, jpb-u2ug wrote: > > > My mistake, thanks Ken. It's just that when you don't do it > too often the > > names get jumbled together. Beside the fact that '+s' sounds > like it should > > be sticky. > > > > Jerry Banker > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Wallis > > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:04 PM > > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > Subject: RE: [U2] port.status > > > > OK, I ignored it the first time, but if this is going to keep > rolling then > > I > > need to jump in with a correction before people assume it must > be correct. > > > > This is not the 'sticky' bit. The purpose of the sticky bit > on some > > (older) > > unix implementations is to keep the text segment of an > executable loaded in > > memory once it has been executed rather than unloading it at > completion.> This was designed to make commonly used programs > load faster, but is now > > pretty much irrelevant in that context and is ignored by some unix > > implementations such as Linux. The sticky bit is most often > used now on > > directories such as /tmp where it requires the actual owner of > a file to > > delete or modify that file, even though other users might have write > > permission on the directory. The sticky bit gets set with > chmod +t. > > > > If you want a program to run with the credentials of another > user (such as > > root) when it is executed, then you set the 'setuid' bit with > chmod +s and > > make sure the file is owned by the appropriate user and > executable by > > relevant people. > > > > I won't get into arguments about how good an idea it is to set > the setuid > > bit on random bits of the operating system. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Ken > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JPB-U2UG > > Sent: Thursday, 4 September 2008 11:24 AM > > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > Subject: Re: [U2] port.status > > > > Yes, but it should have already been set. If you want it to > work with > > everyone then set the sticky bit in the /usr/bin/ipcs. > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "Lloyd Cottrell" > > Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 12:19 PM > > To: > > Subject: Re: [U2] port.status > > > > > i've found that you need to flip on the sticky bit on the > list_readu> > program > > > to fix this problem, which makes it run as root > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 2:49 PM, wrote: > > > > > >> New install of Universe 10.2.4 > > >> >PORT.STATUS > > >> There are no uniVerse sessions that match the specified > conditions.> >> > > >> But one user is logged on as root and then starting > /usr/ibm/uv/bin/uv.> >> And is running a multple program > jobstream, so something Universe > > should > > >> have been detected. > > >> > > >> And we get the same results if a user logins with a unique > login, is > > then > > >> pointed to the /bin/ksh and starting uv. > > >> > > >> Thanks. > > >> Roger > > >> ------- > > >> u2-users mailing list > > >> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > >> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > > ------- > > > u2-users mailing list > > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > ------- > > u2-users mailing list > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > ------- > > u2-users mailing list > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > > ------- > > u2-users mailing list > > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > ------- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
