RE: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts?

2007-06-14 Thread Glen Batchelor
day, June 14, 2007 12:34 AM > To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > Subject: Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture > experts? > > Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a > statement for those a little more familiar with server archite

Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts? experts?

2007-06-14 Thread Gabriel Green
16G is supported on x64 (and I suppose Itanium) versions only. 32-bit versions are limited to 4G. On 6/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, > which > >performed much better with UV and in general than my bran

Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts? experts?

2007-06-14 Thread mgolden
>I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which >performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new Dell >PowerEdge 1950, with two Xeon Woodcrests (Core 2 Duo-based). Each machine >has 16G RAM and similar hard drive configurations. Both run Wind

Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture experts?

2007-06-13 Thread Gabriel Green
Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a statement for those a little more familiar with server architecture I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new Dell Pow