Jeff:
Thanks for your advice. Due to the settings of our system, when I ran my
UniObject Codes, I have to force the codes to use another language setting:
ISO-8859-1. Then @VM and @FM works.
Jeff Powell wrote:
Sorry I meant to type LANG=en_US.iso886915.
This is a known limitation I
Jeff:
Could you post the UOJ code segment to do the counting work for your example
here? I want to try them in my environemnt to see the difference. Thanks!
Jeff Powell wrote:
Sorry I meant to type LANG=en_US.iso886915.
This is a known limitation I learned of in IBM's UOJ class.
Note
Here is the main class. I use a wrapper class similar to the one you
created to provide access to the UOJ library.
My environments are RHEL 4.5, Fedora 8, Fedora 9 using console, desktop
application, tomcat and glassfish. I use Netbeans as my development
environment.
I hope this helps.
package
Jeff, I try your suggestion: export LANG=iso885915. It doesn't look like
working neither. It has the same effect with LANG variable set to C. Any
other suggestion?
Jeff Powell wrote:
Try setting yourLANG variable before executing your program.
export LANG=iso885915
This is a Linux only
: waivic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:18 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UOJ and value-mark and field-mark
I have a very simple file-TESTS, which only has 4 fields: @ID field, F1,
F2
and F3. F1 is a single value field, F2 is a multi-value field
Sorry I meant to type LANG=en_US.iso886915.
This is a known limitation I learned of in IBM's UOJ class.
Note the difference below. In this sample Attribute 136 is MV with 8 @VM
marks as viewed in screen edit.
Default: LANG=en_US.utf8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uojCounter]$ java -jar dist/uojCounter.jar
Sorry I meant to type LANG=en_US.iso885915.
This is a known limitation I learned of in IBM's UOJ class.
Note the difference below. In this sample Attribute 136 is MV with 8 @VM
marks as viewed in screen edit.
Default: LANG=en_US.utf8
[EMAIL PROTECTED] uojCounter]$ java -jar dist/uojCounter.jar
Change the @FM to @AM see if what the results are.
-Original Message-
From: waivic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 4:18 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UOJ and value-mark and field-mark
I have a very simple file-TESTS, which only has 4 fields
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Sun Jun 08 00:35:12 2008
Subject: RE: [U2] UOJ and value-mark and field-mark
Change the @FM to @AM see if what the results are.
-Original Message
I have a very simple file-TESTS, which only has 4 fields: @ID field, F1, F2
and F3. F1 is a single value field, F2 is a multi-value field and the value
is one value-mark-separated list, F3 is a single value field. It has the
following sample record in the file:
Field Name Value
@ID
10 matches
Mail list logo
