It's something I've always done over the last twenty years. The select
processor in theory should apply optimisiation but I always break my
statements down to reduce the working record set and to increase readability.
Makes very little difference on smaller amount of records but makes a huge
statements made
more sense.
--Ron P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Adrian Matthews
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] broken up SELECTS
It's something I've always done over the last twenty
Adrian Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/11/2004
10:26:48 AM:
It's something I've always done over the last twenty years. The select
processor in theory should apply optimisiation but I always break my
statements down to reduce the working record set and to increase
readability.
Makes
Ron,
I frequently break up selects for readability by whomsoever will follow
after me. I've managed to avoid awkward AND and OR logic - or at least
limit it - by cascading selects.
- Charles Readability Barouch
Pingilley, Ron wrote:
The UV keyword REQUIRE.SELECT makes this a possibility. On
: Thursday, November 11, 2004 7:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] broken up SELECTS
It's something I've always done over the last twenty years. The select
processor in theory should apply optimisiation but I always break my
statements down to reduce the working record set and to increase
