-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno
Sent: Monday, 31 January 2005 16:34
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] [UV] SOX Compliance and Universe
[snip]
(And what does Unclassified mean
using MS development languages, and doing your development
on Windows.
HTH
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marilyn Hilb
Sent: Friday, 28 January 2005 06:35
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] SOX Compliance
I'm guessing Mike's note is in response to Marilyn, not Meeta.
Marilyn wrote:
The previous company I worked at uses what I believe is
now a Microsoft product called SourceSafe.
MR MICHAEL.HENDERSON wrote:
Meeta,
Microsoft Visual Source Safe [VSS] is a comprehensive
source-code
Now to this:
Seeing this post made me wonder how other companies productivity has
changed since SOX. We are going to have to hire people to do jobs that did
not exist before. Programming changes that used to take less than a day
usually cannot be done now in that time frame. In order to get
Just to add, there is also a trimmed down COBIT Quickstart available
from the IT Goverance Institute that is targeted at the small to medium
sized enterprise. $25 for ISACA members, $50 for non-members.
--
Regards,
Clif
~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON
You can user Remote VOC entries on sensitve commands to excute a
security programs to allow or track access.
Meeta Advani wrote:
Hi all,
The company I work for, Mothers Work Inc., is a publicly held company,
traded on NASDAQ. As a result, we are obliged to comply with the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
We have just been through our SOX compliance here at Caligor. We are a
fortune 500 company, so SOX has been an obligation for us as well.
We were going to use an inhouse system that was already partially developed.
As it turns out there were to many curveballs that the auditors threw at us
for us
Seeing this post made me wonder how other companies productivity has changed
since SOX. We are going to have to hire people to do jobs that did not exist
before. Programming changes that used to take less than a day usually cannot
be done now in that time frame. In order to get the proper signoffs
]To:
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
es.comcc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [U2] [UV]
SOX Compliance and Universe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
er.u2ug.org
01/27
: RE: [U2] [UV] SOX Compliance and Universe
The previous company I worked at uses what I believe is now a Microsoft
product called SourceSafe. It would 'check out' a programs source code,
which means making it writeable and changing the ownership to the user who
checked it out. Then when changes
Since this is non-technical, reply has been posted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Regards,
Clif
Jerry Banker wrote:
Isn't it true that SOX only applies to companies that are publicly traded? I
guess if a company were thinking of being publicly traded in the near future
they might be concerned but if
We are a law firm, and so far no worries... Though having somewhat greater
control than no control sounds like a great idea.
Don Kibbey
Financial Systems Manager
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett Dunner LLP
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please
@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] SOX Compliance and Universe
Isn't it true that SOX only applies to companies that are publicly traded?
I
guess if a company were thinking of being publicly traded in the near
future
they might be concerned but if they don't
First I want to sincerely thank Vance, Clif and Bill for kind words. Vance,
having you, my customer speak out like that makes it all worth while. :)
Naturally I do have some remarks about this stuff --I've been living and
breathing these issues for over a decade now and the SOX stuff
14 matches
Mail list logo
