Re: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-04 Thread Mats Carlid
Yes I know that's why I asked if it would do. It was by no means clear if formatting and headings were required... BTW what does ud LIST ... ALL do when there are multiple dict entries for the same field? Does it list all of them and if not - how does it select wich one to use ? --mats

Re: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-02 Thread Ian Stuart
Or move LIST to VOCLIB, setup LIST as an R type in the VOC pointing to VOCLIB and use F4 in the R VOC entry to invoke a remote subroutine that can then modify the sentence. Regards Ian Stuart Ken Wallis wrote: Larry Hiscock wrote: How about just adding a phrase to each DICT called ALL

Re: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-02 Thread Mats Carlid
Would LIST.ITEM be an answer ? At least it lists all the fields... -- mats --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-02 Thread Marilyn Hilb
Ohoh. I like that! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:43 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject:Re: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

Re: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-02 Thread Dawn Wolthuis
On 12/2/05, Marilyn Hilb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ohoh. I like that! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 2:43 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject:Re: [U2] [UV] is

RE: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-02 Thread Scott Ballinger
Unfortunately, LIST-ITEM is just a raw record dump and does not display field names (just numbers) and does not apply the appropriate conversions for numbers, dates, times, etc. I like letting REVISE build the @REVISE item- why not call it from a trigger whenever the dict is updated? Or you

RE: [U2] [UV] is there an equivalent to the UD ALL UniQuery keyword?

2005-12-01 Thread Ken Wallis
Larry Hiscock wrote: How about just adding a phrase to each DICT called ALL that lists all of the D-type items? [snip] One time setup, then it's available for their use. And then they have to maintain it for ever? Or shall I put a trigger on the dictionary of every file that updates the