RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-20 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe George Smith wrote: As I have told you before I am not interested in Raining Data and I for one wish you would stop your touting. My posting did have a little RDC and a smiley but since you'd like to approach this more

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-19 Thread Jeff Ritchie
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe George Smith wrote: As I have told you before I am not interested in Raining Data and I for one wish you would stop your touting. My posting did have a little RDC and a smiley but since you'd like to approach

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-18 Thread Dawn M. Wolthuis
: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Marketing costs $. Unless U2UG is going to start charging membership fees, I don't see where this will be possible In terms of Cache size, IIRC they quote figures around 4,000,000

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Marc Harbeson
Will one need to use UO.NET with 6.1 or will it also work with 5.x and 6.0? -Original Message- From: Leroy Dreyfuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Folks

RE: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread George Smith
. -Original Message- From: Leroy Dreyfuss [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 7:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Folks, Hang in there.. UO.NET for U2 will be announced VERY soon! Regards

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Ross Ferris
month in MSDN Magazine Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage  an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread GarryS
: Thursday, June 17, 2004 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe AND YET, I think one of the strengths of the Cache camp is that they basically rolled a large number of Mumps implementations into a single, unified product, got rid

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Tom Firl
I've heard of MUMPS and interviewed at a hospital were that was used. Was that written in U2 ... Mumps was a DEC implementation? My understanding is that MUMPS/Cache is somehow related to Revelation. I don't know if that's true or not, just one of those things a long-time MV programmer

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread Tony Gravagno
Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote: Cache' blankets the Java market with ads as well... I have no clue whether their marketing strategy is working to grow them significantly beyond their initial MUMPs base, but I'm definitely curious. Dawn, I've had loose discussions with MV VARs about Cache' for quite

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-17 Thread David Jordan
] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: Friday, 18 June 2004 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Marketing costs $. Unless U2UG is going to start charging membership fees, I don't see where this will be possible In terms of Cache size, IIRC they quote

RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread George Smith
], and thereafter, destroy the electronic message immediately. -Original Message- From: Tony Gravagno [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 4:34 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe -Original Message- George Smith wrote

Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread HENDERSON MICHAEL MR
it!' come-back with something a little more official than 'Tony Gravagno said so' ;-) Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
more official than 'Tony Gravagno said so' ;-) Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe [snip] PDP now has

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Dave S
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe [snip] PDP now has the sanctions of Microsoft, and it can't hurt to tell management that you're

Re: Unclassified RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe

2004-06-16 Thread Leroy Dreyfuss
with something a little more official than 'Tony Gravagno said so' ;-) Thanks Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Gravagno Sent: Thursday, 17 June 2004 09:34 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata