Don't worry, Ken, you'll get use to it. I'm called all kinds of things
and I've gotten use to it. smile
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Wallis
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 9:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is a snip of a post the venerable Ken Wallis made a while back
explaining how a program is found.
I'm not convinced that I like being referred to as 'venerable' ;^)
Cheers,
Ken
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit
I see you like modest better ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Ken Wallis
colin alfke
Here is a snip of a post the venerable Ken Wallis made a while back
explaining how a program is found.
I'm not convinced that I like being referred to as 'venerable' ;^)
Cheers,
Ken
---
u2-users
LOGTO simply looks at the environment variable udthome (!set udthome).
If the account exists under the path in udthome then you can use the
path relative to that in udthome (although I've never tried anything
like ..\..\myaccount). The full path will always work. Of course you can
use the dos 8.3
For UV, LOGTO seems to work like this:
If you don't specify the full path and the account exists in UV.ACCOUNT
it will go there; otherwise it looks for the account in your current
directory (at the same level and below) and will go there. If it
doesn't exist in your current directory and it
I'd like to piggyback on this question with another related:
What is the exact set of rules for determining whether an account
can/should be referenced via a full path vs just the name? It seems it's
not as simple as just having an entry in UV.ACCOUNT or UD.ACCOUNT. Is this
flavor-dependent?
