RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-04-01 Thread John Jenkins
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Robert Sent: 31 March 2008 14:46 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-31 Thread Anthony Youngman
-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing the anti-virus software vs. disabling them. Could/would you please share your rationale for making that recommendation? The feedback I am

Re: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-31 Thread Scott Richardson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 9:45 AM Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Good Morning John, Our Network Manager asked why you recommended removing the anti-virus software vs. disabling them. Could/would you please share your

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-30 Thread Jeff Fitzgerald
] On Behalf Of John Jenkins Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 6:29 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see one of the system constraints and assume that's your bottleneck (been

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures {Unclassified}

2008-03-30 Thread HENDERSON MIKE, MR
to see which releases of UD are qualified. My $NZ0.02 Regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith, Robert Sent: Saturday, 29 March 2008 9:31 a.m. To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-29 Thread John Jenkins
Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see one of the system constraints and assume that's your bottleneck (been there). Run some mete As others have said, see a specific bottleneck first then take it from there. Some suggestions on things to look at in Windows and

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-28 Thread Symeon Breen
I may be mistaken but the /3gig means an individual process can take over 2gig ram at any one time. So you need to use your task monitor to see if your udt processes are reaching this limit. Personally I very much doubt it, but you certainly need to see where the limits are. -Original

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-28 Thread Smith, Robert
Hi Jeff, We have since come to realize that the /3gig switch is not for us. What we are trying to do is be proactive to hopefully avoid a problem situation. Late last year we were forced to move to the latest version of the vendor software we use. Under the previous version, our registration

RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures

2008-03-28 Thread Marc Harbeson
@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures I may be mistaken but the /3gig means an individual process can take over 2gig ram at any one time. So you need to use your task monitor to see if your udt processes are reaching this limit. Personally I very much doubt it, but you