RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

significantly different. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Johnson Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 7:15 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Has anyone tested my reported D3 best method

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

A(5). My 1 cent. - Original Message - From: Piers Angliss [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 8:51 AM Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Not that it seems to matter these days but both this method and the ..-1 notation (which

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 10:11 AM Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. My results were different. Substring assignment is very fast, but not as fast as -1 and CONVERT. *** * substring assignment *** STIME = TIME() ITEM = SPACE(99

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

I believe MCD. I'll test the next time I visit this client. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 9:02 AM Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Which platforms don't support system(11)? -Original

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

Thanks for the thanks. Mark Johnson I'm curious of the DIM A(5) method on other platforms. I dare not try it on my Microdata clients. - Original Message - From: Tom Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 11:31 AM Subject: RE: [U2] REMOVE

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

a virtual memory issue like years (decades) ago. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Dzevad Dizdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:27 AM Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Hi Mark, There is another fast method to consider

RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

, August 22, 2005 05:27 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Hi Mark, There is another fast method to consider A= FOR I=1 TO 5 IF A = THEN A := I END ELSE A := @VM : I END NEXT I It will take less then 1 second to finish on our system

RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

Which platforms don't support system(11)? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dzevad Dizdar Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 12:27 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Hi Mark

RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

My results were different. Substring assignment is very fast, but not as fast as -1 and CONVERT. *** * substring assignment *** STIME = TIME() ITEM = SPACE(99) PTR = 0 FOR J = 1 TO 5 L = LEN(J)+1 ITEM[1+PTR,L] = J:@VM PTR += L

RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

Thanks Mark. Great job. You can satisfy some of the people some of the time but you can never satisfy all of the people all of the time. This obviously took some time to do and I appreciate the effort. Tom Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED] 630-235-2975 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

Hey, the evaluation of various methods is great, it would be even greater if the folks doing the evaluating would let us know what sort of hardware. One poster mentioned a laptop, that's good info. The original guy mentions a production system that is in use, that's good too. But, it would be

RE: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

, August 21, 2005 9:27 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised. Hi Mark, There is another fast method to consider A= FOR I=1 TO 5 IF A = THEN A := I END ELSE A := @VM : I END NEXT I It will take less then 1 second to finish on our system

Re: [U2] REMOVE results as promised.

Hi Mark, There is another fast method to consider A= FOR I=1 TO 5 IF A = THEN A := I END ELSE A := @VM : I END NEXT I It will take less then 1 second to finish on our system. Dzevad - Original Message - From: Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: