Please move this thread to U2-Community. To read and post on
U2-Community: visit http://listserver.u2ug.org, enter your e-mail
address, and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.
- Charles Barouch, Moderator
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe
ro and PC's for
everything else.
Just asking.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Batchelor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:52 AM
Subject: RE: [U2] U2 and MAC
> Don't you mean OS-X as been available on Intel systems for 2 weeks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Raymond DeGennaro II
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:34 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Cc: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; David Wolverton
> Subject: RE: [U2] U2 and MAC
>
> At 11:13 -0600 2006/01/23, David
At 11:13 -0600 2006/01/23, David Wolverton wrote:
Macs now contains Intel chips, and are running faster due to them.
Yes, but it's not quite that simple. The iMac went from a
single-core 1.8 GHz G5 to a dual-core 1.8 or 2.0 GHz Core Duo and the
15" 1.5 GHz G4 PowerBook more or less became th
P.S. Please send pictures ;-)
>-Original Message-
>From: Glen Batchelor
>
> Don't you mean OS-X as been available on Intel systems for 2
>weeks? I find it impossible to believe that Apple would stoop
>down to Intel processor architecture, just to get more market
>share. If they DID, th
>From www.apple.com: What's an Intel chip doing in a Mac? A whole lot
more than it's ever done in a PC.
Hth
Colin
>-Original Message-
>From: Glen Batchelor
>
> Don't you mean OS-X as been available on Intel systems for 2
>weeks? I find it impossible to believe that Apple would stoop
>
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] U2 and MAC
Don't you mean OS-X as been available on Intel systems for 2 weeks? I find
it impossible to believe that Apple would stoop down to Intel processor
architecture, just to get more market shar
At 11:52 -0500 2006/01/23, Glen Batchelor wrote:
Don't you mean OS-X as been available on Intel systems for 2 weeks?
Nope. Apple's Intel-based Macs.
I find it impossible to believe that Apple would stoop down to Intel processor
architecture,
They're using the new "Core Duo" (aka Yonah) se
, January 23, 2006 10:53 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] U2 and MAC
Don't you mean OS-X as been available on Intel systems for 2 weeks? I find
it impossible to believe that Apple would stoop down to Intel processor
architecture, just to get more market share. If they DID,
llspec.com
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baakkonen, Rodney A (Rod) 46K
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 10:01 AM
> To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
> Subject: RE: [U2] U2 and MAC
>
> Macs have been A
Raymond DeGennaro
II
Sendt: 23. januar 2006 05:24
Til: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; Mark Johnson
Emne: Re: [U2] U2 and MAC
At 14:14 -0500 2006/01/21, Mark Johnson wrote:
>Isn't the underlying OS either Linux or Unix. That should be a start.
In a nutshell,
At 09:10 -0600 2006/01/23, Ron White wrote:
The OS is not the problem. Any version of UV designed to run on
PPC/Unix would likely run on XServer but in a corporate environment
I can not commit to an unsupported install.
The PPC's in Macs are related to the Power series in IBM's servers,
but
Mark Johnson wrote:
Isn't the underlying OS either Linux or Unix. That should be a start.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Banker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:17 AM
Subject: [U2] U2 and MAC
Has there ever been a thought to put either of the U2 produc
At 14:14 -0500 2006/01/21, Mark Johnson wrote:
Isn't the underlying OS either Linux or Unix. That should be a start.
In a nutshell, it's the best of FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD.
Ray
--
.=.
| =-=-=-=-=-=-= Eagle Rock Information Sy
Isn't the underlying OS either Linux or Unix. That should be a start.
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Banker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:17 AM
Subject: [U2] U2 and MAC
> Has there ever been a thought to put either of the U2 products on a Mac?
With
> all o
At 11:01 -0600 2006/01/20, George Smith wrote:
And to IBM's credit, I believe if there was a demand they could (no
question here) and would do the port.
I think that's the crux. First you've got a DBMS that a small
percentage of people are running and a lot of potential users write
if off wi
At 09:17 -0600 2006/01/20, Jerry Banker wrote:
Has there ever been a thought to put either of the U2 products on a Mac? With
all of the recent news about Apple making a comeback I was wondering if there
has ever been a thought to put a release on the MacOS.
I've asked the folks at IBM several t
l do the "right"
(subjective) thing.
grs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ron White
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:35 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [U2] U2 and MAC
Importance: Low
Jerry Banker wrote:
>Has
Jerry Banker wrote:
Has there ever been a thought to put either of the U2 products on a Mac? With
all of the recent news about Apple making a comeback I was wondering if there
has ever been a thought to put a release on the MacOS.
Jerry Banker
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u
19 matches
Mail list logo
