Andy,
I am not entirely sure on your first part of your question. But I would
say no to the second. UNIDATA is per seat use not per CPU. At least in
the UNIX side of things.
-Keith
Keith Johnson IT
Lewis-Clark State College (LCSC)
208 792 2510
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Did Keith just reply to an email from last October? Or is the u2
list/server having problems?
Rog
Keith Johnson wrote:
Andy,
I am not entirely sure on your first part of your question. But I would
say no to the second. UNIDATA is per seat use not per CPU. At least in
the UNIX side of
, 2006 1:22 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Unidata and multi-core chips.
Did Keith just reply to an email from last October? Or is the u2
list/server having problems?
Rog
Keith Johnson wrote:
Andy,
I am not entirely sure on your first part of your question. But I
would
search shows how to set processor affinity permanently for an
application if the opposite behavior is desired:
http://searchwin2000.techtarget.com/tip/1,289483,sid1_gci778853,00.html
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:48:31 -0500
From: David Wolverton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] UniData and multi
as a fact and never thought about.
DW
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Beahm
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 8:04 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UniData and multi-core chips.
FWIW, I have seen a UniVerse process
licenses.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: 24 October 2005 17:31
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidata and multi-core chips.
Hi all,
We are about to go to RFP for a new
When you start up, in the case of a dual/quad-processor, my
understanding is that process is 'bound' to whatever CPU the OS kicked
it off on... So, in theory, you do get some advantage of multiple
processors, but the load is not dynamically balanced based on usage.
Therefore, if all your heavy
For Windows the processes float? Interesting!! I was just reporting what
we were told eons ago -- that Processes were bound to a CPU on on startup on
a Windows MultiProcessor... If that's not the case, even better ...
Information in this area is hard to come by -- any authoritative information
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Wolverton
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 9:59 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidata and multi-core chips.
Go ahead and move to UniData 7.1 -- if you have not already installed
6.1,
just skip it entirely - I
PROTECTED]
10/24/2005 10:30 AM
Please respond to
u2-users
To
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
RE: [U2] Unidata and multi-core chips.
Hi all,
We are about to go to RFP for a new box. How does this change the
dynamics if you use/or are looking at IBM's LPARS or virtual
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] Unidata and multi-core chips.
Hi all,
We are about to go to RFP for a new box. How does this change the
dynamics if you use/or are looking at IBM's LPARS or virtual server
technology?
-Keith Johnson
Lewis-Clark State College
500 8th Ave.
Lewiston, ID. 83501
Go ahead and move to UniData 7.1 -- if you have not already installed 6.1,
just skip it entirely - I can't think of a downside...
To my knowledge, UniData is unaware of multi-anything... When you start up,
in the case of a dual/quad-processor, my understanding is that process is
'bound' to
12 matches
Mail list logo
