RE: [U2] [UV] Dynamic Array Delimiters

2004-08-20 Thread Stuart Boydell
Here is a definitive list of codepoint values, delimiter names and, where applicable, system variables that can be used to access them. Code Name.. Variable Name 254 Field Mark (@FM) 254 Attribute Mark (@FM) ... possibly semi definitive 254 Attribute Mark (@AM) maybe

[U2] Accuterm Email

2004-08-20 Thread Mark Johnson
To all who care or replied to my questions about Wintegrate and/or Accuterm automatic email. Accuterm does have automatic email. In fact, they have 3. Like the Wintegrate program WIN.MLSEND, Accuterm has AT.SEND.EMAIL.OUTLOOK, AT.SEND.EMAIL.COA and AT.SEND.EMAIL.MAPI all available from their

[U2] Secure connex from outside world

2004-08-20 Thread Davis, Dawn
Greetings to all. For those of you who are UNIX/UNIDATA/DATATEL clients, how have you handled the following situation? We have a need for outside contractors to access our server to do some development work. I will only accept a secure connection, and therefore wish to use SSH. Which emulator

RE: [U2] Secure connex from outside world

2004-08-20 Thread Chuck Mongiovi
I will only accept a secure connection ... SSH I have successfully used Putty You could always use Putty to create an SSH tunnel (port forward your telnet port to that system only) and then use whatever client you like .. -Chuck --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe

RE: [U2] Secure connex from outside world

2004-08-20 Thread Kevin King
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Davis, Dawn Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 8:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Secure connex from outside world Greetings to all. For those of you who are UNIX/UNIDATA/DATATEL clients, how have you

[U2] Please, UnSubscribe Me...

2004-08-20 Thread Anthony McIntyre
--- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Shawn Waldie
I have records that contains a mv list of dates, i.e., 13200:@VM:13312:@VM:13176. I need to store these values in ascending order, so I: a) convert the VMs to AMs, b) perform a FORMLIST, SAVE.LIST, SORT.LIST; and c) load the values back into the attribute. There has to be a more efficient way.

RE: [U2] Secure connex from outside world

2004-08-20 Thread Bill H.
Dawn: AccuTerm has SSH and it works great. This is probably your best solution if the outside contractors are developing on UD. Hope this helps. Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Davis, Dawn Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 7:04 AM

Re: [U2] Displaying '.jpg' images in Universe

2004-08-20 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 8/20/2004 6:16:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Depends on how you're accessing UV really. If you're using one of the intelligent emulators (wIntegrate, ViaDuct, Reflections etc) then it's quite easy and these products have demo programs. And

Re: [U2] Secure connex from outside world

2004-08-20 Thread Ian Renfrew
In the past I've used Putty and wIntegrate to create a secure connection. Reference the following link to access the article 'Using SSH security with wIntegrate' ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/data/u2/newsletter/archive/jan-03.pdf Regards, Ian Renfrew - Original Message - From:

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Kevin King
You could write a simple insertion sort routine to reorder the information. Assuming the list is called DATE.LIST and you want ascending right-justified sorting, something like this might work: NEW.DATES = '' DATE.CNT = DCOUNT(DATE.LIST,@VM) FOR DATE.LOOP = 1 TO DATE.CNT THIS.DATE =

Re: [U2] Secure connex from outside world

2004-08-20 Thread FFT2001
In a message dated 8/20/2004 9:02:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dawn: AccuTerm has SSH and it works great. This is probably your best solution if the outside contractors are developing on UD. Hope this helps. Bill I have to agree with Bill. Accuterm offers

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Brutzman, Bill
The keys to this problem are the LOCATE and INSert UniBasic commands. Consider a semblance of a program to do this below... Date.Array = '' Date.Count = dcount(These.Dates, VM) + 1 for This.Index = 1 to Date.Count This.Date = These.DatesThis.Index locate This.Date in Date.Array1

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Allen E. Elwood \(CA\)
Hi Shawn, There is! There was a thread not too long ago where I assisted Chuck Mongiovi with a similar problem, this is the code that I suggested and that he debugged :) His problem was that he wanted a 5 value string sorted by attribute, based off of the 5th element of the string, and here's

RE: [U2] EVAL formatting

2004-08-20 Thread Karjala Koponen
I run on UniData 5.2. I have used the first field conversion and formatting feature of EVAL by inserting a field that has the conversion and formatting I want as the first 'phrase' (stuff to first semi colon) of an EVAL statement as in ... EVAL FIELD.WITH.CONV.FMT.DESIRED;eval I want that

[U2] UV/ 1Gb NIC

2004-08-20 Thread David Litzau
Is anybody running a 75+ UniVerse site on a 2003 server with 1Gb NIC's? If so, what NIC card and driver version are you using? David Litzau --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

[U2] Web site down?

2004-08-20 Thread Jeff Schasny
www.u2ug.org seems to be down Jeff Schasny | Denver, Colorado, USA | [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Alfke, Colin
Please note two things: 1. The resulting list (in this case) has only unique dates - it strips the duplicates 2. No other attributes are also getting sorted. Depending on your data and file structure this is either OK or *REALLY BAD*. Of course, it is trivial to update this sample to work with

[U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Shawn Waldie
Thank you for your thoughts, gentlemen. This is what I wrote before the suggestions reached me: WRITELIST XL.NEW.LIST ON X.SAVEDLIST EXECUTE X.SORT.SAVEDLIST GETLIST X.SAVEDLIST TO 1 THEN READLIST XL.SORTED.DATES FROM 1 ELSE XL.SORTED.DATES = END CLEARSELECT 1 END SWAP @AM WITH @VM

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Ian McGowan
From: Alfke, Colin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note two things: 1. The resulting list (in this case) has only unique dates - it strips the duplicates Bzzt! LOCATE(THIS.DATE,NEW.DATES,1;PTR;'AR') ELSE NULL NEW.DATES = INSERT(NEW.DATES,1,PTR,0,THIS.DATE) No matter what, THIS.DATE

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Kevin King
I agree with 2, but it doesn't strip out duplicates. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfke, Colin Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 11:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting Please note two things: 1. The resulting list

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Ian McGowan
From: Shawn Waldie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your thoughts, gentlemen. This is what I wrote before the suggestions reached me: WRITELIST XL.NEW.LIST ON X.SAVEDLIST EXECUTE X.SORT.SAVEDLIST GETLIST X.SAVEDLIST TO 1 THEN READLIST XL.SORTED.DATES FROM 1 ELSE

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Allen E. Elwood \(CA\)
I vote for the locate/insert method! :-D While the method below works, it will be sluggish compared to locate/insert especially if the list is large. Try it, you'll like it! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shawn Waldie Sent: Friday, August

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Alfke, Colin
I think it has to do with how big your lists are. If they are small then all of the reading and writing in your routine will kill it with overhead; however, if your lists are large then writing them out and sorting them there is a known optimization trick. Of course, it will also depend on how

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Peter Olson
fyi...i hate when dates are stored in ascending order... makes locates a :( This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Alfke, Colin
Mea Culpa. It's been a bad day -Original Message- From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting I agree with 2, but it doesn't strip out duplicates. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL

RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting

2004-08-20 Thread Kevin King
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Olson Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 1:47 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [U2] [UD] Sorting fyi...i hate when dates are stored in ascending order... makes locates a :( Clarify

[U2] Universe 10.1 and WebSphere MQ Integration.

2004-08-20 Thread Rajesh Menon
Hello, I know this topic was discussed here earlier, but I still have some basic questions. We have a need of communicating between a web portal and universe database (installed on AIX) through WebSphere MQ. From the previous discussions, I figured the best way to handle this is by using MQ API

RE: [U2] Universe 10.1 and WebSphere MQ Integration.

2004-08-20 Thread Tom Firl
What is the best form of passing data between the web pages and U2 database through MQ? MQ doesn't really care about format of data stored in the message. You should choose the record format that sending and receiving application can produce and consume. XML seems to be a popular choice

RE: [U2] EVAL formatting

2004-08-20 Thread Morelli, David
The suggestion by Karjala did work, but only if a field with the desired conversion already exists. In the file I chose for a test sample there were no fields with different conversions, so I had to create a new field to continue the test. Which was the same work as creating a virtual field in

Re: [U2] Universe 10.1 and  WebSphere MQ Integration.

2004-08-20 Thread FFT2001
Someone mentioned about using XML envelops or fixed length ASCII file for data transfer. I wouldn't bother using XML if YOU are in control of the content of the source AND destination both. Just use comma delimited or fixed length fields. XML seems like overkill to me. Now if you were NOT