[U2] RE: UNIX tune for UV 300 users
Hmmm, we use to have one of those Pyramid/SNI systems, runinng UV...I found this old info...(maybe its helpful) SEMMNI 10 SEMMSL 60 SEMMNS 60 (I note I found, said you couldn't even *install* UV unless those kernel parameters were changes on the RM series server) But that was for UV 9.4.x for about 100 users. The amount of memory you need, depends on the application. Minimum should be 1.5 MB per user, more for SB+ applications (and the like). I assume you're using Reliant UNIX? I think the latest UV version is only UV 9.5.1.x, for that platform? Here's a Reliant UNIX generic tuning guide (this may help): http://manuals.fujitsu-siemens.com/infothek/drluguec/books/o42329e1/o42329e1 .pdf Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilya Shabaev Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:55 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: UNIX tune for UV 300 users Hello Everyone! I am going to install uniVerse 300 users on customer Siemens RM machine If somebody inform which UNIX Kernel parameters is critical for this quantity users? I now only that SHMMNU must be more that number of users. Any recomendation about memeory ussage and other system requirments will be usefull. Thank in advance! Ilya Shabaev --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
Title: RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query No, UniData doesn't allow you to combine lists like this. One of the few things I miss from D3. -- Colin Alfke Calgary, Alberta Canada Just because something isn't broken doesn't mean that you can't fix it Stu Pickles -Original Message- From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:37 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query My 2 cents on this topic and maybe it'll trigger a UD/UV response. D3 allows you to GET-LIST A-LIST B-LIST and you get them combined for your next process.
[U2]
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Pete This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
RE: [U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
Title: Message Yes it does, albeit syntax is different. 2 ways: LIST.UNION combines savedlists GET.LIST LIST-A TO 1 10 record(s) selected to SELECT list #1. GET.LIST LIST-B TO 2 10 record(s) selected to SELECT list #2. MERGE.LIST 1 UNION 2 19 record(s) selected to SELECT list #0. (see also related verbs: - LIST.INTERSECTION - LIST.DIFF ) MERGE.LIST combines active select lists. LIST.UNION LIST-A WITH: LIST-B TO: LIST-C 19 record(s) SAVEd to SELECT list "LIST-C" (See also related keywords - INTERSECTION - DIFF ) Note: an id that appears in both lists appears only once in resultant list. This may be differ from D3. The above examples are from Universe, not Unidata, but I'm pretty darn sure they're the same, since they are both PI-derivatives and if I recall correctly, those all came from PI. No, UniData doesn't allow you to combine lists like this. One of the few things I miss from D3.From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] D3 allows you to GET-LIST A-LIST B-LIST and you get them combined for your next process.
{Virus?} Re: [U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed (graycol.gif, ecblank.gif, pic00981.gif). Please read the "VirusWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. I didn't follow this email thread, but (if it applies) wanted to point out that UniData does have a MERGE.LIST command that allows you to manipulate two active select lists into a third list with different options. Wally Terhune Manager - U2 Advanced Technical Services IBM DB2 Information Management Software Tel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, Search - Online! Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical Conference September 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/03/2004 06:48 AM Please respond to u2-users To [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc Subject [U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query No, UniData doesn't allow you to combine lists like this. One of the few things I miss from D3. -- Colin Alfke Calgary, Alberta Canada Just because something isn't broken doesn't mean that you can't fix it Stu Pickles -Original Message- From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:37 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query My 2 cents on this topic and maybe it'll trigger a UD/UV response. D3 allows you to GET-LIST A-LIST B-LIST and you get them combined for your next process. This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service -- The original e-mail attachment graycol.gif is on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and has been replaced by this warning message. If you wish to receive a copy of the original attachment, please e-mail helpdesk and include the whole of this message in your request. Alternatively, you can call them, with the contents of this message to hand when you call. At Mon May 3 07:02:01 2004 the virus scanner said: (graycol.gif) Note to Help Desk: Look on the MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20040503 (message i43E1vS19725). -- Postmaster This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service -- The original e-mail attachment pic00981.gif is on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and has been replaced by this warning message. If you wish to receive a copy of the original attachment, please e-mail helpdesk and include the whole of this message in your request. Alternatively, you can call them, with the contents of this message to hand when you call. At Mon May 3 07:02:01 2004 the virus scanner said: (pic00981.gif) Note to Help Desk: Look on the MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20040503 (message i43E1vS19725). -- Postmaster This is a message from the MailScanner E-Mail Virus Protection Service -- The original e-mail attachment ecblank.gif is on the list of unacceptable attachments for this site and has been replaced by this warning message. If you wish to receive a copy of the original attachment, please e-mail helpdesk and include the whole of this message in your request. Alternatively, you can call them, with the contents of this message to hand when you call. At Mon May 3 07:02:01 2004 the virus scanner said: (ecblank.gif) Note to Help Desk: Look on the MailScanner in /var/spool/MailScanner/quarantine/20040503 (message i43E1vS19725). -- Postmaster
[U2] RE: [UD] Union Query
Unidata's MERGE.LIST is only half of the solution. the sql
prompt looks like the other half. Is there a way to pass an active list to
thesql statement? Thanks.
Ed Burwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 973.361.5400 x1512
-Original Message-From: Wally Terhune
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:40
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: {Virus?} Re:
[U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
Warning: This message has had one or more
attachments removed (graycol.gif, ecblank.gif, pic00981.gif). Please read the
"VirusWarning.txt" attachment(s) for more information.
I didn't follow this email thread, but (if it applies) wanted to point out
that UniData does have a MERGE.LIST command that allows you to manipulate two
active select lists into a third list with different options.Wally
TerhuneManager - U2 Advanced Technical ServicesIBM DB2 Information
Management SoftwareTel: 303.294.4866 Fax: 303.294.4832 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ibm.com/software/data/u2/support - Open, Query, Update, Search -
Online!Don't miss out on the IBM DB2 Information Management Technical
ConferenceSeptember 19-24, 2004 - Las Vegas, NV[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/03/2004 06:48 AM
Please respond
tou2-users
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
[U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union
Query
No, UniData
doesn't allow you to combine lists like this. One of the few things I miss from
D3.
-- Colin Alfke Calgary, Alberta Canada
"Just because something isn't broken doesn't mean that you can't fix it"
Stu Pickles
-Original Message- From: Mark Johnson
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 9:37 PM
To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject:
Re: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
My 2 cents on this topic and maybe
it'll trigger a UD/UV response.
D3 allows you to GET-LIST A-LIST B-LIST and you get them
combined for your next process.
Re: [U2] RE: UNIX tune for UV 300 users
Thank you, David, It is usefull link for tuning Reliant Unix. I will try to check performance with described tools. I use UV 9.5.12 under Reliant Unix 5.45 IBM informed me that SHMMNI must be more that number of uv users. I checked process memory ussage with ps -el command and found that every uvsh process used more that 7MB memory . It is strange because I thinked that normal ussage of memory about 1.2 Meg. If somebody know any other ways for testing of performance please let me know. Thank in advance, Ilya Hmmm, we use to have one of those Pyramid/SNI systems, runinng UV...I found this old info...(maybe its helpful) SEMMNI 10 SEMMSL 60 SEMMNS 60 (I note I found, said you couldn't even *install* UV unless those kernel parameters were changes on the RM series server) But that was for UV 9.4.x for about 100 users. The amount of memory you need, depends on the application. Minimum should be 1.5 MB per user, more for SB+ applications (and the like). I assume you're using Reliant UNIX? I think the latest UV version is only UV 9.5.1.x, for that platform? Here's a Reliant UNIX generic tuning guide (this may help): http://manuals.fujitsu-siemens.com/infothek/drluguec/books/o42329e1/o42329e1 .pdf Regards, David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ilya Shabaev Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 7:55 PM To: U2 Users Discussion List Subject: UNIX tune for UV 300 users Hello Everyone! I am going to install uniVerse 300 users on customer Siemens RM machine If somebody inform which UNIX Kernel parameters is critical for this quantity users? I now only that SHMMNU must be more that number of users. Any recomendation about memeory ussage and other system requirments will be usefull. Thank in advance! Ilya Shabaev --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
Title: Message
Sorry
Charles, Wally, et al, I realize that UD has merge.list (only in ECLTYPE U). I
was merely lamenting the fact that it doesn't have the remarkably handy feature
of D3's get-list:
GET-LIST A B C D ... {(U}
The
get-list will retrieve all items (including duplicates - which UD won't do) from
as many lists as you like. The (U will only get the unique ID's. Much easier
than trying to merge.list a whole bunch of items
together
Colin
P.S.
Charles, I didn't mean to "correct" you last week with the convert statement. I
know you know the difference. I just didn't want anyone to take you to literally
and not use CONVERT without understanding why
-- Colin
Alfke Calgary, Alberta Canada
"Just because something isn't broken doesn't mean
that you can't fix it"
Stu Pickles
-Original Message-From: Stevenson, Charles
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004
7:37 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [U2]
RE: Memo: RE: [UD] Union Query
Yes
it does, albeit syntax is different.
2
ways:
LIST.UNION combines
savedlists
GET.LIST LIST-A TO 1
10
record(s) selected to SELECT list #1.
GET.LIST LIST-B TO 2
10
record(s) selected to SELECT list #2.
MERGE.LIST 1 UNION 2
19
record(s) selected to SELECT list #0.
(see also related
verbs:
-
LIST.INTERSECTION
-
LIST.DIFF )
MERGE.LIST combines active select
lists.
LIST.UNION LIST-A
WITH: LIST-B
TO:
LIST-C
19
record(s) SAVEd to SELECT list "LIST-C"
(See also related
keywords
-
INTERSECTION
-
DIFF )
Note: an id that appears in both
lists appears only once in resultant list. This may be differ from
D3.
The
above examples are from Universe, not Unidata, but I'm pretty darn sure
they're the same, since they are both PI-derivatives and if I recall
correctly, those all came from PI.
No, UniData doesn't allow you to combine lists like this.
One of the few things I miss from D3.From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
D3 allows you to GET-LIST
A-LIST B-LIST and you get them combined for
your next process.
RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Have her (him) chain itself? j -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dana Baron Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 12:35 PM To: U2-Users Subject: [U2] PHANTOM forever Greetings, Looking for some advice with Phantoms (seems to be a theme lately). I have a udt program that I want to have always running (infinite loop). I want to start this as a background process using PHANTOM. Pretty straight forward so far. How can I do this so the process keeps running even after I log out the process that started it? Unidata 5.2; Tru64 Unix 5.1A Thanks for any help Dana Baron System Manager Smugglers' Notch Resort --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Title: RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Dana,
How about trying a cron job or looking in to your inittab man pages?
I personally have never wanted to make an infinite loop, however I have made my share on accident.
I am sure this type of logic will do the trick but it might just run away and spawn so many jobs that you have no resources or UNIDATA Lic for your users.
LOOP
PHANTOM {WORK HERE program or PA etc}
REPEAT
# No conditional
# I personally would be very careful with this. One miss step here and you might just regret this later.
A better way would likely be researching making the process a daemon... (from my AIX Man pages)
Files Reference
---
inittab File
Purpose
Controls the initialization process.
Description
The /etc/inittab file supplies the script to the init command's role as a
general process dispatcher. The process that constitutes the majority of the
init command's process dispatching activities is the /etc/getty line process,
which initiates individual terminal lines. Other processes typically dispatched
by the init command are daemons and the shell.
Keith Johnson
Systems AdministratorProgrammer / Analyst
Lewis-Clark State College (LCSC) 208.792.2510
500 8th Ave.
Lewiston, ID 83501
-Original Message-
From: Dana Baron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 9:35 AM
To: U2-Users
Subject: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Greetings,
Looking for some advice with Phantoms (seems to be a theme lately). I have a
udt program that I want to have always running (infinite loop). I want to
start this as a background process using PHANTOM. Pretty straight forward so
far. How can I do this so the process keeps running even after I log out the
process that started it?
Unidata 5.2; Tru64 Unix 5.1A
Thanks for any help
Dana Baron
System Manager
Smugglers' Notch Resort
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Dana Baron wrote: Greetings, Looking for some advice with Phantoms (seems to be a theme lately). I have a udt program that I want to have always running (infinite loop). I want to start this as a background process using PHANTOM. Pretty straight forward so far. How can I do this so the process keeps running even after I log out the process that started it? One way I've handled this in UV is to create a logon for the phantom process and check the @TTY variable within the process itself. If @TTY = phantom then I go into the loop, otherwise I execute the PHANTOM command to spawn another copy and let the current process terminate. If you want to insure the process is always running, even after a reboot, you can have a shell script run by cron start the phantom process. Just write a flag to a flat file somewhere when the process starts and check it in the cron script to avoid starting more than 1 process. You still have to remember to remove the flag prior to a system shutdown though, or you could add a startup script (/etc/init.d for most *nixes) to remove it. -John --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Whenever I've had to create a phantomed loop like this, I always put in a
'kill switch'. This kill switch reads an item from a parameters file. If
this item is empty then the program continues to run. If, however, the
parameter item contains anything, the program then gracefully terminates
itself.
Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company)
301-360-8839
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Johnson
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
Dana,
How about trying a cron job or looking in to your inittab man pages?
I personally have never wanted to make an infinite loop, however I have made
my share on accident.
I am sure this type of logic will do the trick but it might just run away
and spawn so many jobs that you have no resources or UNIDATA Lic for your
users.
LOOP
PHANTOM {WORK HERE program or PA etc}
REPEAT
# No conditional
# I personally would be very careful with this. One miss step here and you
might just regret this later.
A better way would likely be researching making the process a daemon...
(from my AIX Man pages)
Files Reference
---
inittab File
Purpose
Controls the initialization process.
Description
The /etc/inittab file supplies the script to the init command's role as a
general process dispatcher. The process that constitutes the majority of the
init command's process dispatching activities is the /etc/getty line
process,
which initiates individual terminal lines. Other processes typically
dispatched
by the init command are daemons and the shell.
[SNIP]
This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
---
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] unsubscribe
Title: unsubscribe
RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
On Behalf Of Dana Baron Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 2:59 PM To: U2-Users Subject: RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever I have a Unidata Basic program (called MESSAGE_LOOP) that needs to constantly check for messages deposited into a particular directory. It is an endless loop that checks for messages, processes any it finds, sleeps for a second, then does it again. I need to start this process up and leave it running forever. I found the nohup command on Tru64 that executes a script with the following line. udt PHANTOM MESSAGE_LOOP Works fine for starting up the job. The problem is that the job now gobbles up 80% of the CPU. How can I reduce this process's hunger for CPU so that it can share nicely with others? Should I set the priority lower or should I increase the sleep time inside the program? Increasing the sleep time is probably your best bet, but here are some suggestions that may help, if you can implement them. 1. Change the directory to a hashed file. Processing directories is significantly slower than hashed files, particularly with whole file queries such as SELECT and LIST. This would only be easy to do if the messages are being written by a UniData process. 2. Use PAUSE instead of SLEEP. PAUSE by works similarly to SLEEP, with two exceptions. The first exception is that the PAUSEd process can be awakened early by another process via the WAKE command. This means that the process writing the message could WAKE the phantom to tell it to process, therefore the PAUSE time could be very large and the phantom would only do work when needed. (The unix gurus out there know that SLEEP can also be awakened via a kill command, but that is a different beast.) The second exception is that the time of the PAUSE is not as exact as SLEEP. The time is rounded up to the next 10 second interval. This is because PAUSEs are handled by the cleanupd daemon instead of a system alarm, and cleanupd checks the pause list at intervals. The default interval is 10 seconds, but it can be changed by changing the startup command for cleanupd in the startud script. We changed ours to 3 seconds. The fact that the time is rounded up a few seconds has very little impact here because most of our paused processes are awakened before the time limit or the time limit is not critical. We have over a dozen phantom processes that are always running in the background, doing things similar to your process. Most of them are using PAUSE/WAKE, or are sleeping for 30 second intervals. HTH, Dean --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] Union Query
There are three ways to accomplish this as far as I can tell: SQL UNION query which requires nothing else to be done. You do not need to use the MERGE.LIST or equivalent with this as a SQL and the UNION operator allow multiple files to drive the query. However in the case of the UNION operator the result sets from the 2 or more queries need to have the same number of columns and the columns need to be the same data types etc. Use the MERGE.LIST command to merge the two lists. However you still have a problem, as you need a file to run the LIST or SELECT through which has ALL the IDS from both or more - files in it as the U2 LIST and SELECT commands only use 1 file to drive the query. You can only do lookups to other files. Write a BASIC program that does what you want. I would suggest to subscribers of this list that they embrace the SQL capability in U2 and use it where appropriate. I hope that this is through lack of knowledge of the capabilities rather than a bigotry of ours is better than yours as exhibited by a unnamed poster in the list over the last few months. Just needed to get that off my chest ;-) Phil Walker +64 21 336294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] infocusp limited \\ PO Box 77032, Auckland New Zealand \ www.infocusp.co.nz DISCLAIMER: This electronic message together with any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, do not copy, disclose or use the contents in any way. Please also advise us by return e-mail that you have received the message and then please destroy. infocusp limited is not responsible for any changes made to this message and / or any attachments after sending by infocusp limited. We use virus scanning software but exclude all liability for viruses or anything similar in this email or any attachment
[U2] Digest issues and mime
Title: Message Henceforth, mime attachments will be stripped from all email received by the lists, and HTML email will be converted to plain text. This should resolve some of the issues that we are seeing with the digests. Larry Hiscock Western Computer Services
[U2] Test - please ignore
Sorry folks ... just testing to make sure the mime stripper is working properly.Larry HiscockWestern Computer Serviceshttp://www.wcs-corp.com/
RE: [U2] Test - please ignore
Title: Message Is that a stripper without music? David Logan Database Administrator HP Managed Services 139 Frome Street, Adelaide 5000 Australia +61 8 8408 4273 - Work +61 417 268 665 - Mobile +61 8 8408 4259 - Fax -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry HiscockSent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 1:02 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [U2] Test - please ignore Sorry folks ... just testing to make sure the mime stripper is working properly.Larry HiscockWestern Computer Serviceshttp://www.wcs-corp.com/
RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever
We have many phantoms doing various stuff in the background. We're running Universe (and previously PI/Open) and we have to do nothing special to get these phantom processes to keep running when the parent process is logged out. All we do is the standard PHANTOM program.id. Maybe under UniData there's a problem with the parent logging out - but not under UniVerse. AdrianW -Original Message- From: Sara Burns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 4 May 2004 09:19 To: U2 List ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Subject: RE: [U2] PHANTOM forever We discovered this problem with our phantom which sends data to Oracle. We have developed a double stage method to disconnect it from the user. Initially we write the command to launch the phantom to a file - we call ours SCRIPTS, which contains the command of the structure echo program name | /uv/bin/uv ./\PH\/name of log file in PH) 21 Then we have an item in the VOC which contains SH -c 'full path to the item in SCRIPTS' Our initialisation program writes the entry in SCRIPTS then executes the item in the VOC. In the past we extended this to be able to run multiple phantoms doing the same job. Improved hardware means we don't need multiples now. This was originally developed using UniData and we have since ported it to UniVerse. It works well. Sara Burns (SEB) Development Team Leader Public Trust Phone: +64 (04) 474-3841 (DDI) Mobile: 027 457 5974 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Information contained in this communication is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient the information should not be used, disclosed, copied or commercialised. The information is not necessarily the views nor the official communication of Public Trust. No guarantee or representation is made that the communication is free of errors, virus or interference. Disclaimer. This e-mail is private and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise us by return e-mail immediately, and delete the e-mail and any attachments without using or disclosing the contents in any way. The views expressed in this e-mail are those of the author, and do not represent those of this company unless this is clearly indicated. You should scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. This company accepts no liability for any direct or indirect damage or loss resulting from the use of any attachments to this e-mail. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
RE: [U2] Universe logins on a Windows 2003 server
-Original Message- [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Ramirez snip Just upgraded my development Universe 10.1 server to Windows 2003 from Windows 2000. Previously, domain users could log into universe on this server, but since the upgrade this isn't possible. Only users with administrator rights can telnet and log into universe. I have seen a previous post about setting up a group policy, but i am not running active directory here, just an NT PDC. Wish I had a solution for you, but all I can do is jump in and say 'me too'! In my case it was an upgrade to Windows 2003 SBS on a production machine running UV 9.6.something that started the fun. Been banging my head against the wall trying to solve this freaky phenomena for weeks. I don't know if you are experiencing this, but I discovered as you did, that only users with admin rights can login to Universe - but - this is even more bizarre - I further discovered that only users *who had admin rights before the Windows OS upgrade* can login to universe. In other words, if I take an existing domain user and add them to the administrators group - still can't login to UV, or even if create a new user and add them to the administrators group - no luck. I've added the Domain\Domain Users group and a specific user to Allow Log on locally under Local Security Settings, but with no effect. Ditto. Well, we had setup a UVUsers group with rights to 'log on locally', but we also tried granting Domain Users the right to login locally and still no luck. So far we've removed and re-installed Universe and UVAdmin, deleted and recreated a few of the user accounts that always had been able to access Universe before the Windows upgrade, made the permissions on UV home folder and all subfolders wide open - full control for group everyone - ditto with data account folders/files and still have the same problem. What is the trick to getting this working again? Sure wish I knew or someone knows!! Let us all know if you stumble on a solution. Before the upgrade i didn't have to use any universe Network Settings, so far i am content to let the users be prompted to the universe account to connect to. Thanks. Bob Ramirez IT Services Body Wise International http://www.bodywise.com/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.u2ug.org/listinfo/u2-users
