Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
I presume you have never had to maintain programs written in a language totally lacking structured code elements like assembler or to a lesser degree fortranIV. I have. Believe me: GOTO's ( or conditional and unconditional branches, jumps or transfers ) ARE EVIL ! It's som much easier to follow a program with FOR , IF ... ELSE LOOP and CASE . To untangle assembler programs I marked the loops and jumps with long arrows on the printed programs - so much work just to get the overall picture that's emediatelly apparent in structured code! IMNSHO however we shall not abandon the GOTO before we have some exception handling mechanism - like try / catch in java. Just don't use them when the 'structured' alternative exists. -- mats PS. The lack of indentation i assembler and the short names (6char) and numeric labels in fortranIV contributed to the unredability too. Mark Johnson wrote: I'd love to see this test. What's the hatred with the GOTO's. If they're so bad, then let's vote to remove them from the compiler. Let's remove RETURN TO and CLEAR while we're at it as well. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] relative speed of Retrieve SELECT vs Basic SELECT, LOOPREADNEXT,READ. was: [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
Which would you suppose is much faster: I think we need to consider that Unibasic in U2 is interpreted (not compiled into an executable). The compiled basic is actually run by the u2 runtime engine - eg udt (for unidata) The code in 1: (see below) does a SELECT with a condition 'TYPE = V'. The U2 engine only has to interpret this line once. To bring back the required records the U2 engine does not need to evaluate any more basic code. Whereas in the 2: the IF REC[1,1]='V' THEN has to be interpreted for every record returned, which is very costly in CPU. Additionally the number of records returned by the select in 1: will be less than 2:, because we only return back records where TYPE = V. Therefore the LOOP code executes less times in 1: than in 2:. So in 1: we are actioning less lines of basic code in the loop, again giving us a time saving. You will generally get time saving where you action one line of basic code that does many things than doing the same thing with many lines of basic code. Of course 1 would run even faster if we put an index on TYPE. Whereas in 2 we would get no benefit from an index. 1: T0=TIME() FOR I = 1 TO 100 EXECUTE 'SELECT VOC WITH TYPE = V COUNT.SUP' LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID NULL ;* GOSUB DO.STUFF REPEAT NEXT I T1 = TIME() CRT T1-T0 or 2: T0 = TIME() OPEN 'VOC' TO F ELSE STOP FOR I = 1 TO 100 SELECT F LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID READ REC FROM F, ID THEN IF REC[1,1]='V' THEN NULL ;* GOSUB DO.STUFF END END REPEAT T1 = TIME() CRT T1-T0 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] test
test --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
My first job was in Fortran. I understand why GOTO's are evil. That said, I can see where someone in that frenzy of getting an idea down, and not having time to return and tidy one's code, can end up (only too soon) with an un-manageable system. Long-time maintenance programmers have things they don't like - like GOTO - that they've sweated through. Newbies, or slow learners, don't realise the legacy one leaves when writing in a sloppy way. Primary Concept * Not using GOTO's forces me to think out the structure before starting. Rules of Coding * Code remains in its state until completely re-written (ie you start it bad, its gonna stay bad). * Not using GOTO's forces me to think out the structure before starting. * Just coz YOU program that way doesn't mean the guy after you will be able to (ie be considerate - you're bound to move on sometime, and someone else gets your garbage) * think big. If you plan it to take just about anything, within reason, and then program it with a wide vision, efficient will it be (and happy management users will follow) * use comments - that way there's no misunderstanding of intent * take pride in what you do - after all, this is what you're leaving the next generation - is that what you want to be remembered for? dennis -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid Sent: 18 June 2004 09:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO I presume you have never had to maintain programs written in a language totally lacking structured code elements like assembler or to a lesser degree fortranIV. I have. Believe me: GOTO's ( or conditional and unconditional branches, jumps or transfers ) ARE EVIL ! It's som much easier to follow a program with FOR , IF ... ELSE LOOP and CASE . To untangle assembler programs I marked the loops and jumps with long arrows on the printed programs - so much work just to get the overall picture that's emediatelly apparent in structured code! IMNSHO however we shall not abandon the GOTO before we have some exception handling mechanism - like try / catch in java. Just don't use them when the 'structured' alternative exists. -- mats PS. The lack of indentation i assembler and the short names (6char) and numeric labels in fortranIV contributed to the unredability too. Mark Johnson wrote: I'd love to see this test. What's the hatred with the GOTO's. If they're so bad, then let's vote to remove them from the compiler. Let's remove RETURN TO and CLEAR while we're at it as well. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] 'Press any key...'
Hi Alexey All the other replies have focussed on pressing N (or setting NO.PAGE) If you're in a program you could always do the select in such a way that no text appears on the screen, but that you have the results in variable that you can test, eg CMD = SELECT FILE EXECUTE CMD CAPTURING X RETURNING NO.ITEMS The variable NO.ITEMS will contain the number of items selected, while the variable X will contain the text as it would have appeared on the screen. Should you have wanted to just get the actual records in the file, the easiest would be to do 2 selects one after the other, or a get.list followed by a select eg EXECUTE GET.LIST MY.LIST CAPTURING X RETURNING MYLIST.CNT CMD = SELECT FILE EXECUTE CMD CAPTURING X RETURNING MYSEL.CNT This way, MYLIST.CNT will contain the count of keys in MY.LIST, and MYSEL.CNT will contain the no of keys actually selected from the file. There are other ways of doing this, but I find that this makes sense and is quite easy. I often use the capturing variable's contents to process what the user would have seen, for audit or error-catching purposes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aleksejs Luchko Sent: 16 June 2004 03:56 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] [UV] 'Press any key...' Hi, Is there a way to suppress 'Press any key to continue...' message in SELECT statement? It appears when active select list exists, but not all @IDs from the active select list present in a file being selected. Best regards, Alexey Luchko. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe
Not ALL marketing costs dollars. For example, how many dollars are pumped into Visage marketing on cdp and the u2-users lists? Additionally, it really is amazing the fact that U2UG has a domain name (u2ug.org) and a web site and a host site for u2-users and a zero dollar budget. There are generous people within our midst. So, we'll be calling you then, K? smiles. --dawn Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. www.tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ross Ferris Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 10:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Marketing costs $. Unless U2UG is going to start charging membership fees, I don't see where this will be possible In terms of Cache size, IIRC they quote figures around 4,000,000 seats, so I would think they are on a par with U2 Ross Ferris Stamina Software Visage an Evolution in Software Development -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dawn M. Wolthuis Sent: Friday, 18 June 2004 12:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] .Net Provider for Unidata or Universe Cache' blankets the Java market with ads as well. But I'd be very curious how their market compares to the U2 market. There are other MUMPs implementations, but not as many as PICK. I don't know if they are bigger than U2 -- any guesses? I have no clue whether their marketing strategy is working to grow them significantly beyond their initial MUMPs base, but I'm definitely curious. In preparing the agenda for the Sept 19 meeting of the U2UG in Las Vegas (to which everyone is invited!) we are planning to have significant discussions about the topic of marketing U2 and the underlying database. Even if IBM does not do that type of marketing, potentially the U2UG could do some marketing in the future. Just a thought -- all ideas are welcome. Cheers! --dawn Dawn M. Wolthuis Tincat Group, Inc. www.tincat-group.com Take and give some delight today. --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.707 / Virus Database: 463 - Release Date: 15/06/2004 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
My fault, I should have mentioned the times were from the second run. And when I switched the order the corresponding times also were the same. I'll try your code when I get a chance. Thanks Bruce Bruce M Neylon Health Care Management Group Mark Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/2004 08:02 PM Please respond to u2-users To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO Don't forget that the second set has the benefit of the first set leaving some of the data in virtual memory, hence the second set would have been longer. my 1 cent How about this on your similar UD system. Correct typing implied. OPEN MASTER ELSE STOP SELECT MASTER START=SYS9 10 READNEXT ID ELSE GOTO 15 GOTO 10 15 END=SYS9 PRINT END-START --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
This is what I got on UD 5.1.27 Win2K Dell Poweredge 2500 933Mhz server: Ran one after the other, only user on the system. TIME.READNEXT 46 8712 READNEXT ELSE EXIT 32 8712 WHILE 1 32 8712 LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO 30 8712 GOTO :.X TIME.READNEXT 32 8712 READNEXT ELSE EXIT 46 8712 WHILE 1 31 8712 LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO 32 8712 GOTO :.X TIME.READNEXT 31 8712 READNEXT ELSE EXIT 32 8712 WHILE 1 31 8712 LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO 46 8712 GOTO :.X TIME.READNEXT 47 8712 READNEXT ELSE EXIT 32 8712 WHILE 1 31 8712 LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO 31 8712 GOTO Here is the code I ran - pretty much a cut-n-paste from the e-mails, I just added the counter to give it something to do. Although it took me a minute to figure out where to put it amid the GOTO's :). OPEN 'TEST.FILE' TO TEST.FILE ELSE STOP SELECT TEST.FILE CTR = 0 START.CPU = SYSTEM(9) LOOP READNEXT ID ELSE EXIT CTR += 1 REPEAT END.CPU = SYSTEM(9) CRT END.CPU-START.CPU: :CTR: READNEXT ELSE EXIT CTR = 0 SELECT TEST.FILE START.CPU = SYSTEM(9) LOOP WHILE 1 DO READNEXT ID ELSE EXIT CTR += 1 REPEAT END.CPU = SYSTEM(9) CRT END.CPU-START.CPU: :CTR: WHILE 1 CTR = 0 SELECT TEST.FILE START.CPU = SYSTEM(9) LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO CTR += 1 REPEAT END.CPU = SYSTEM(9) CRT END.CPU-START.CPU: :CTR: LOOP WHILE READNEXT ID DO CTR = 0 SELECT TEST.FILE START.CPU = SYSTEM(9) 10 READNEXT ID ELSE GOTO 15 CTR += 1 GOTO 10 15 END.CPU = SYSTEM(9) CRT END.CPU-START.CPU: :CTR: GOTO -Original Message- From: Mark Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 6:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO Don't forget that the second set has the benefit of the first set leaving some of the data in virtual memory, hence the second set would have been longer. my 1 cent How about this on your similar UD system. Correct typing implied. OPEN MASTER ELSE STOP SELECT MASTER START=SYS9 10 READNEXT ID ELSE GOTO 15 GOTO 10 15 END=SYS9 PRINT END-START --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
I respond with the GOTO perspective when it's cast in an absolutely negative light as in My teacher failed us or Our Company will fire you if you use a GOTO kind of limited thinking. I stand by my beer/alcoholic analogy. And actually, I would like to see this break-on situation done without GOTO's. I've developed a routine that's nice and tidy for any number of break-on levels and I'd like to learn a different way. One can learn programming from a variety of sources: Academic, other peoples code and system-level examples (DM,BP,). I've not run into these GOTO-less environments everyone talks about in 25 years of perhaps 40 different application systems. And yes, I've certainly seen enought bad use of GOTO's to recognize its potential danger. But not in an absolute sense. Thanks. - Original Message - From: Ken Wallis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:32 PM Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO Mark Johnson wrote: This appears to be the semi-annual GOTO holy war. But only one side is fighting. Leave it alone Mark. Nothing good came of it last time, and nothing good will come of it this time. Those who believe GOTOs have their uses will not be convinced otherwise by a thread on a mailing list like this, and those of us who avoid GOTOs completely will similarly not change their mindset for you. I would like for someone to offer me some code segments to perform the following MVquery statement as a true data/basic program: SORT CUSTOMER BY STATE BY CITY NAME BREAK-ON CITY BREAK-ON STATE TOTAL YTD-SALES I really would like to see how the other side programs this. Not that I intend to take this further Mark, but are you seriously trying to imply that sorting, breakpointing and totalling cannot be done well without using GOTO? Although I have trouble envisioning it, I'm confident that there is a coding solution to this specific problem that makes use of GOTO, and I'm sure that you have such a solution in mind. Great. If that makes you productive and you clients happy, then I'm all for it. Just so long as I don't have to consult at one of your client sites once you've retired. My mind simply doesn't work that way. I tend to think about iteration before I look at branches. That drives me towards nested LOOPs and all sorts of structures in which GOTOs are, to my mind, both superfluous and dangerous. I don't want to get into this Holy War. Time was when I'd have taken up the cudgel, but it doesn't achieve anything when you are more than an arm's length away! I'd rather disagree without becoming disagreeable. Please simply take it as read that any problem that can be solved in BASIC using a GOTO, can also be solved without using it. Similarly, I assume that anything I can code a solution to has at least one equivalent solution that involves a GOTO statement. Cheers, Ken --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
At 01:07 PM 6/18/2004, you wrote: I've always thought it would be cool if some Pick vendor would create a verb like MAKE.BASIC And you could say MAKE.BASIC SELECT CUSTOMER WITH LAST.NAME = JOHNSON BY STATE BREAK-ON STATE TOTAL COUNTER And it would take the statement and turn it into a BASIC program (not just using EXECUTE you slackers). That way for particularly thorny problems, you could have a template that you then modified to do something unusual that you couldn't figure out how to do in straight query language. Funny you say this. Ever heard of the ancient utility called REPORT-GEN by Interactive Systems in Phoenix? I'm not sure if that place is still in business, but I actually have source code from this utility that does exactly as you stated; you start the utility, enter all the portions of your statement and when done, it generates nifty BASIC code, albeit circa 1984. Some may not like this code, as its a fine example of how NOT to use GOTO's! Here's a snippet from within the code (total of 674 lines of this!!): PRINT CMSG:DO YOU WANT TO HDR-SUPP? (Y OR N): : INPUT HDRSUPP IF HDRSUPP = ? THEN GOTO 100620 IF HDRSUPP = ^ THEN GOTO 610 IF HDRSUPP = ^^ THEN GOTO 10 IF HDRSUPP # Y AND HDRSUPP # N THEN GOTO 620 GOSUB 8000 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
And ol' Arev has this feature as a query option: LIST FILE BY THIS BY THAT BREAK-ON THIS TOTAL SOMETHING (X) With the option X, you are prompted for a file name and record id, and the source code is written there. Sort of funky-looking, though... Don't know if they carried it over into OpenInsight. Jim At 01:07 PM 6/18/2004, you wrote: I've always thought it would be cool if some Pick vendor would create a verb like MAKE.BASIC Funny you say this. Ever heard of the ancient utility called REPORT-GEN by Interactive Systems in Phoenix? I'm not sure if that place is still in --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] WHILE READNEXT id DO
Personally, I love this syntax. When training others, I usually explain it in this form; READNEXT has to generate a true/untrue value of some kind to determine whether to go down its THEN or ELSE path. We take advantage of that Boolean context to trigger the behaviour of WHERE or UNTIL in a looping context. READNEXT is not the only statement that exhibits this behaviour. Almost any statement that has THEN/ELSE can use it. But READNEXT, READSEQ/READBLK are the most sensible. For example, to process an entire input file: LOOP WHILE READSEQ line FROM f GOSUB processline REPEAT I don't find it difficult to read; FORMAT indents it correctly (which suggests that it's legal syntax). It would be nice were there a section in the BASIC manual about the Boolean context of certain statements, but that's only a minor complaint. Of course, each statement syntax that appears to make at least one of THEN or ELSE mandatory would need a note referring to this section. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] maximum UniVerse file size
32-bit or 64-bit is returned in the array generated by the STATUS statement in BASIC, as well as the other methods already mentioned. If you attend the UniVerse Advanced Technologies class (formerly UniVerse Internals), the use of filepeek - together with some documentation - is given. As far as I know there is no manual that describes filepeek; I guess it's regarded by VMARK and its successors as a support analyst's tool. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] ODBC Error
Also check the database privilege of the user ID that you used. UniVerse SQL privileges do differentiate user, machine\user and domain\user unless these are matched in the UV.LOGINS file (which you can maintain from the Administrator client).\ - Original Message - From: Bjvrn Behr [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:21:43 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] [UV] ODBC Error UV System: UniVerse 10.0.4 O/S : Windows 2000 Yesterday our ODBC connection to UniVerse worked, when we tried again This morning, it did not. It keeps coming up with this error: Error ID: 23 Severity: ERROR Facility: DBCAPERR - User does not have Permission to execute this SQL statement. (I was connecting on as Administrator at the time) When I looked into our system log, I got this: Event Typt: Information Event Source: SceCli Event Category: None Event ID: 1704 Date: 2004/06/14 Time: 21:51:33 User: N/A Computer: BART Description: Security policy in the Group policy objects are applied successfully. Nobody we know updated any poilcies. Any help would be great. Regards Bjorn Behr Programmer HYFLO Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd Tel : +27 11 386 5800 Fax : +27 11 444 5391 Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW : http://www.hyflo.co.za In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry, and has been widely regarded as a bad idea. - Douglas Noel Adams (1952-2002), British author --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Senior Pick Programming Position - Centennial, CO
Trust Company of America, a leading provider of financial services nationwide, has an immediate opening for a Senior Multivalue Database Programmer / Analyst. The ideal candidate for this position will have broad knowledge of multi-value database architecture and management. You will work as a member of a team to design, develop and implement an IBM UniVerse multi-value database system for the data repository to provide responsive outsourcing solutions to independent Investment Advisors. You will be an integral member of a team to re-architecture, development, and migration of legacy systems to J2EE architecture utilizing Java and providing our customers the ability to manage their accounts and trade efficiently. Requirements for this position include: - Thorough understanding and knowledge of the software development life cycle (SLDC), with the proven ability able to follow development and coding standards. - Extensive software generation (actual coding) and troubleshooting analysis experience. - Demonstrated ability to design, code, integrate, test, and document software in a rapid prototype approach, incorporating new functionality as required. - Proven problem solving and analytical abilities and experience troubleshooting / debugging complex software. - Excellent English communication skills with both technical and non-technical personnel. - Proven record of the tactical delivery of complex, mission-critical software development projects. Technical Expertise: More than 5 years experience in multi-value database programming. Extensive knowledge of Pick Basic language and the IBM UniVerse database (or equivalent experience with similar multi-value databases. Experience with documentation of UniVerse flow diagrams, UniVerse paragraphs, and high-level integrated documentation of system processes. Knowledge of Java / J2EE and open source programming environments is a plus. BS in Computer Science or related degree and / or equivalent experience. Experience in the finance / financial services industries a plus. Trust Company of America is proud of our corporate culture built on the principles of Integrity, Teamwork, Service, Innovation, and High Expectations. We are dedicated to providing services to meet the needs of our customers in a rapidly changing and highly regulated market. We offer a minimum travel, a competitive compensation package, and a comprehensive benefits package including health and dental care, 401(k), flexible benefits, vacation and paid time off, and educational assistance. Relocation will not be considered - we are seeking a local candidate. Please send resume and qualifications to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] inserting European format dates using SQL
ICONV code DDMY (and variations such as DDMAY or DDMY2-) will always convert European-style dates correctly, no matter what your local settings are. Define an attribute alias with conversion code DDMY and use that alias definition for your input data. -- The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use of the individual and/or entity identified in the alias address of this message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby requested not to distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original message from your system. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] U2 XML
Mike The xml interface in U2 can process xml data in a variable through a Basic program. This would allow you to do it on the fly. Was there other issues related to this. Any comments would be valuable feedback to IBM engineers, if you could post it on the U2canXML forum on the www.u2ug.org site. Regards David Jordan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Rajkowski Sent: Wednesday, 16 June 2004 12:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [U2] U2 XML Like Mark, we are using UOJ to send and receive the XML to UniVerse. We ended up developing our own routines, to get a better response. We have the need for near real time access, in our J2EE environment, and utilize XML in the web app as well as the means to communicate to the UniVerse Back end. Interesting enough, we are using DB2 for our Cache Database, and a common XML schema for both databases. Updates are sent to Universe, and then the change is replicated back to the DB2 Cache. ( Over simplification, but the point is that we needed a way to process the XML quickly, and saving it to disk before processing was to resource intensive ) Mike --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
