Re: [U2] Custom Functions

2005-06-24 Thread u2
I think it's a universe/unidata difference. I get the segmentation fault running unidata in ecl type U as well. Here's some interesting info and an ugly hack--in unidata. It seems completely wrong to me (UV in Prime flavour) Apparently, the keywords SUBROUTINE and FUNCTION are interchangable

RE: [U2] Parsippany

2005-06-24 Thread Debster
Then I would suspect that the local based U2 Headhunters would have the best clues to that Joe Chelston, Matt Hart et al -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:25 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

RE: [U2] Custom Functions

2005-06-24 Thread u2
Well, the idea was to produce something that could be called as a function from basic, because the function calling syntax is cool and convenient in a lot of cases, but that could also be used in a I-type. For things to work in SUBR in an i-type, you need that extra parameter. Of course you could

RE: [U2] Custom Functions

2005-06-24 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
Something I did in some subroutines which makes them more of a multi tasker (I-descriptors) and flexible, is to pass file variables as parameters - when you can. So, the subroutine would look something like; snip SUBROUTINE GET.NEXT.IJKEY(FILE.CN, ERR, F.STAT, IJKEY) $INCLUDE HEADERS

RE: [U2] Parsippany

2005-06-24 Thread John Varney
Yes, I'm sure we all would... :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 5:25 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Parsippany Wow, wouldn't we all love to get a list like that.

RE: [U2] Custom Functions

2005-06-24 Thread George Gallen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Anthony Dzikiewicz Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 9:40 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: RE: [U2] Custom Functions Something I did in some subroutines which makes them more of a multi tasker

RE: [U2] IBM Ascential

2005-06-24 Thread Mark Eastwood
FYI, from IBM's Today Newsletter... Ascential and IBM - Hear the complete story. Attend the live webcast, Wednesday, June 29 at 11:00 am eastern. Hear the complete story of Ascential and IBM. http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?on=IMNL605K11 This webcast will cover the IBM Information

RE: [U2] Custom Functions - UV or UD

2005-06-24 Thread phil walker
One I can thing of, and I normally work on UV and prefer, is that you can debug programs which interact with file which have triggers on them. In UV this is not possible and is seen as an enhancement! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL

[U2] [UV] E_FAIL from SQL/OLEDB query

2005-06-24 Thread Tony Gravagno
I'm hoping someone has a solution to an issue plaguing one of our clients. The system is Universe 10 over AIX, using OleDB from .NET client and it is running normally for telnet users. Many SQL select statements are being issued to the server successfully, but once in a while an E_FAIL error

RE: [U2] Custom Functions - UV or UD

2005-06-24 Thread u2
That's a useful feature. Anyone else know of any? I've noticed that unidata is accomodating about letting you run subroutines as though they were programs, and calling programs as though they were subroutines. Is that an advantage or something scary? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [U2] [UV] E_FAIL from SQL/OLEDB query

2005-06-24 Thread Noah Hart
Just a guess ... When we use ODBC we often see this type of error, when the record we are trying to access is locked. There does not seem to be anyway to force a READ ONLY connection via ODBC. I'm not sure about OleDB. Noah -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [U2] Custom Functions

2005-06-24 Thread u2
When I said 'hack' I meant the ugly code that I had to create to make the trick work--the idea of having to put a dummy parameter into the function call in the basic program in order to make it compatable with the subr call in the i-type. Sorry for the confusion there. -Original Message-