The connection between Excel and MS Query is (still!) a DDE conversation.
Something has gone wrong with the way this is working. There's probably some
diagnostic tools - search the MS knowledge base.
I believe it's unrelated to uvutils.dll - that's a separate problem that you
have! :(
---
It may not be "more" that you need. As Martin noted, the hashing algorithms
generate a number between 1 and GSEMNUM based on the group address (and
device/inode numbers), so that all records in the same group in the same file
use the same semaphore set. Making this wider (incresasing GSEMNUM)
I don't know how it works in Unidata, but in Universe, you add a record
to the VOC called DEMO, and in that record you put IAM DEMO. If you
want the account to be MyDemo, you add a record to the VOC called MyDemo
and put in IAM MyDemo. These records would be paragraphs.
Thanks,
Nick Cipollina
Al,
For what it's worth ...
>CT SYS.MESSAGE 081001
081001
0001 unirpc: Bad Connection
0002
>
Not very helpful, I'm afraid
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al DeWitt
> Sent: Wednesday, 19 July
How does one go about creating a synonym account. For instance, I have an
account
E:\MyDirectory\Demo
If I log into this directory, which I must do, the @WHO tells me I'm logged
into "DEMO". Makes sense. The path in the (UD.ACCOUNT) file is
"E:\IBM\ud71\Demo". So, if I want to log into both
Al,
Is it possible that you lost network connectivity between the client
executing the query, and the unidata server, during the query? I'm
responding from memory, so I could be off, but I'm thinking this might
be the culprit.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Has anybody know what this error means?
SQL Status: IM985
Error code: 81001
[Ardent][UniData ODBC Driver][UniData RDBMS][IBM][SQL Client][RPC] error
code = 81001
Albert L. DeWitt Jr.
Senior Programmer Analyst
Stylmark, Inc.
(V) 763-574-8705
(F) 763-574-1052
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Exactly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Walker
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:48 PM
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] SOX question (United States only, I believe)
The friendly neighborhood cracker isn't a threat. I
Have a customer who has been succesfully running (actually using very
heavily) UVODBC with MS-Query and Excel. They are using MS Office 2003, but
I'm not sure of their Universe version off the top of my head.
Today something has broken the loving couple of MS-Query and MS-Excel ;-)
MS-Query functi
The friendly neighborhood cracker isn't a threat. It's only the employees
that can't be trusted.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry Banker
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 1:51 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] SOX question
But doesn't this leave the information readily available to the friendly
neighborhood cracker?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon J
Glorfield
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:41 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] SOX q
Document everything! Make no changes without a written request from the
users. Have them test and approve the changes, in writing, after
completion. Store your documentation in a format that is readily
accessible to the auditors.
Gordon J. Glorfield
Sr. Applications Developer
UnitedHealthca
Short answer: you can't. (We just went thru a Sox audit)
Regards,
--
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of DAWES, Ray
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 10:19 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: ALLEN, David
Subject: RE: [U2] SOX question (Unite
Ray,
One way to do it is to form a joint venture with other tea makers
and do business through that company, which subcontracts your company
and the
others. Of course, in theory, all the subs would have to be SOX
compliant, but it should satisfy most customers.
- Chuck "Or, You Could J
Hi,
I have been reading this thread and others with interest, but no one has
managed to answer how you can be SOX compliant when you have only one guy
who programmes, administers, upgrades the software and makes the tea!
Any suggestions anyone?
Cheers,
Ray Dawes
Hi Manu,
> Actually, I've got many Collision, Retries into the analyze.shm -s
>
> I'll probably conclude to increase the GSEMNUM to give more
> processing versus give more space by expend TABSZ.
This is a good conclusion. High collision counts can be caused by having a
table that is too wide (xxT
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your comments,
Yes theses values are large, (too large).
I'm looking to understand how to manage theses parameters in a environment
where applications use Transaction processing (commit / rollback) with
little records
in a pure relational schema (header files and details
Hi Manu,
These do seem to be some very large numbers.
GSEMNUM=241, GLTABSZ=150, RLTABSZ=375, RLOWNNER=375
This gives a record lock table with 90,000 items in it. Ok, because of how
locking works you would be very unlikely to be able to use all 90,000 but
this still seems very large. Do you reall
Do the U2 ENCRYPT and DECRYPT functions not do what you want ?
On 14/07/06, Raymond DeGennaro II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 00:44 +0200 2006/07/14, 8ukasz s wrote:
> >has anyone got some implementation in PICK (UVI,
> >U2, JBASE) BASIC (or somethig similar) of
> >asymmetric encryption algo
Hi,
Thanks for suggestion, A good way to search.
I found two events, when I search about it into the ibm's kdb and google, I
found reference to the windows's heap,
From uvregen I receive :
with new parameters : uvregen: reconfiguration complete, disk segment size
is 11'862'500
Universe don
20 matches
Mail list logo
