> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Baker Hughes
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 1:35 PM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] Encrypt Algorithms
>
> Do you think a certain algorithm should be AVOIDed because it's been
> cra
For those of you that have not taken the opportunity to use our Free Full
screen editor that uses state of the art technology from Eclipse.org, this
announcement may fall on deaf ears. We at U2logic have been real busy
adding this and that to our free products.
Today we are announcing an outline
Does anyone have an opinion about which are the best encryption
algorithms to use?
If you have any technical doc citations this is very useful.
Would you NOT use the U2 Encrypt function simply because it doesn't
offer the algorithm you need (or one mandated by your client/employer)?
Would you NOT
I don't agree that RESULT[1] is any clearer/cleaner than
RESULT[LEN(RESULT),1].
Does the [1] represent the FIRST character or the LAST character?
I will agree that it's shorter to write. =)
--
Donald Verhagen
Application Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tandem Staffing Solutions, Inc.
5
Symeon, others,
I tested every 128+ bit cipher available with Encrypt and here are the
results:
All the ciphers work with encoding but require the workaround (remove
extra LF).
None work without encoding - the decrypt side either adds a random
character, or craters altogether, and Decrypted string
If you start to use RFS or UniData Replication then there are some other
daemons you could monitor. Are you using or planning to use these? The
number of daemons varies depending on your configuration.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Watch T30FILES as well (just in case) as you are going there...
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Ballinger
Sent: 25 August 2006 18:04
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Need help - UV intermittent & rov
How can I globally assign LPTR to GREENBAR?
--Bill
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
In HP-Ux (via SAM) the GreenBar printer is specified as the default
destination.
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RESULT[1] does work the same, at least on UV10.0 - maybe some have
concern on cross-platform portability.
And Symeon - thanks for your code fragment. That, and a nights rest
helped me to get things going. I'll post the encryption code that's now
working if anyone is interested. It may be of use
David A. Green wrote:
Why do programmers use result[LEN(result),1]? Doesn't result[1] do the same
thing but easier, quicker, and more readable?
variable[1] to reference the last byte of variable is a relatively
recent addition to Universe. Where "relatively" refers to the lifeline
of the Pi
Thanks for the suggestions.
This problem happens after initial login without any logtos.
I will take a look at MFILES.
/Scott Ballinger
Pareto Corporation
Edmonds WA USA
206 713 6006
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a
name of winmail.dat]
---
u2-user
UniVerse On HP-Ux
With the commands...
ASSIGN GREENBAR TO LPTR 0
ASSIGN PR0 TO LPTR 0
Using retrieve reports with "LPTR" in the script yields the print job
getting into WAIT mode in the spooler.
0015: SORT POD _
0016: BY SELECT.RM.BASE BY.EXP INVOICES _
0018: WHEN RECD.DATE GE "<>"
I know you are UV, but sometimes UD and UV have commonalities.
Anyway, on UD we can use a pipe "|" as a line continuation.
IF (TV AND TV2) OR |
(TV3 AND TV4) THEN
CRT 'MATCH'
END
Doubt if it will work on UV, but worth a try.
Bruce
Bruce M Neylon
Health Care Management Group
Why do programmers use result[LEN(result),1]? Doesn't result[1] do the same
thing but easier, quicker, and more readable?
Thanks,
David A. Green
DAG Consulting
www.dagconsulting.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Friday
Here is my standard crypt sub
FUNCTION AD.CRYPT(Word,key,iv)
* Function to crypt something i.e. a password
* a2c limited, Oct2005
Crypt=Word
Err='';result='';resLoc=1;salt=''
algorithm="rc2-cbc"
Err=ENCRYPT(algorithm,2,Word,1,key,1,1,salt,iv,result,resLoc)
IF NOT(Err) THEN
I don't believe it - you're right!
I could have sworn that using a DIM on a previously defined common array
would do nothing, well I stand corrected.
Maybe I'm remembering what happened under PI/Open, but it certainly does
work under Universe.
Sorry for the misinformation. :(
-Original Mess
In infomation flavour (and probably in ideal flavour) you can resize
dimensioned arrays.
-- mats
Womack, Adrian wrote:
"Dimensioned" arrays can be resized - BUT arrays defined in common
can't.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL
18 matches
Mail list logo