RE: [U2] Universe Triggers

But IF you can update VOC, you CAN bypass remote voc, which is what David said! As part of your security you need to make sure that users CAN'T update VOC (which is rather harder than it seems at first glance). Cheers, Wol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [U2] Universe Triggers

Is this because you can change the permissions on the VOC to read-only? Does this have an affect on anything else? Bill Susan Joslyn wrote on 10/15/2008 4:35 AM: David, With the use of remote voc you really can prevent by-pass of wrapped TCL commands. Completely, unequivocably. Regards,

[U2] Dvorak's musings about Windows 7

Here is a link to John Dvorak's most recent musings about Windows 7. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2332430,00.asp Notice the #1 item on his wish-list is an file system that Pick managed 40 years ago! Bill --- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To

RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible?

Mike... Wow, the 64bit is an easy solution. I tried something with either the create-file or the resize command 6 months ago and it failed with my conclusion at the time that it must not be supported on our windows 2003 platform. Yesterday I used the create file with the 64bit option and it

RE: [U2] Universe Triggers

David, With the use of remote voc you really can prevent by-pass of wrapped TCL commands. Completely, unequivocably. Regards, Susan Joslyn SJ+ Systems Associates, Inc. PRC(r) Real software configuration management for U2! -- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:26:00 +1100

RE: [SPAM] - RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible? - Email has different SMTP TO: and MIME TO: fields in the email addresses

I concur I use 64bit files for anything over 2 gig now and I am on a 32 bit Windows 2003 server -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Buss, Troy (Logitek Systems) Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 9:56 AM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org

[U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible? {unclassified}

We have a few distributed files on UV 10.1.18 on Windows 2003 32 bit. 64 bit files would be better but I thought there were limitations in their use on a 32 bit OS, especially with DYNAMIC files? I seem to remember from the UV internals course that UV/Net can have problems accessing the file.

Re: [U2] Universe Triggers

Which can get interesting if you have some of that old pre-EXECUTE legacy code that generates a Proc, writes it to the VOC, and CHAINs to it. Or that executes CREATE.FILE. Or that... Of course, you can put a trigger on the VOC to log changes. Regards, Clif On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:40 AM,

RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible?

We decided to try (64bit Type30 on 64bit OS) part files on a couple of large transaction files because it made archiving easier for us. We could just drop off a chunk at a time. However, we've since discovered that part files can't be used with SBClient SmartQuery because it uses S/REFORMAT verb.

RE: [U2] [UV] using distributed files with multi level data files possible? {Unclassified}

UV/Net doesn't handle Distributed Files (32- or 64-bit) - it's a published 'feature'. You have to refer to the individual part files. Actually, that seems like a good Better-and-Better submission ... Regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boydell,