Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

I don't think ic_opensession itself knows - it will connect via a socket to unirpcd which itself will know that it is unidata and do the correct thing. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton

Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

BUT UniRPC is for both UniData and UniVerse... how does IT know which to connect to?? DW -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 4:42 AM To: 'U2 Users List'

Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

By default it will use defcs as defined in your unirpcdservices file, this can be setup as the ud or uv server. Either set defcs inm that file to be the same as udcs or use ic_unidata_session. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] create.index and numeric dict names

Hi Symeon This works fine and creates the index with no problems on Universe. Unfortunately I don't have UD at hand. Have you tried putting the dictionary name in quotation marks? Maybe then it might treat it differently? CREATE.INDEX TEMP 1019 Just a stab in the dark! Regards Glenn

Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

And that was the answer from Rocket -- when I installed UniVerse, it overwrote the file, and made UniVerse the center of the... well... universe... g ... I changed it back to UniData and think all is well now. Thanks for the list -- hopefully this will help someone in an archive somewhere in the

Re: [U2] create.index and numeric dict names

Thanks Wally, but if the dictionary it's not a direct reference to a specific atb number it WON'T be used. For example, if 1019 is a group extraction, then any *other* name using the exact same atb and group extract will be ignored. This is a big problem especially for multipart keys. For

Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

Or you could create a wiki entry using U2UG.ORG and enlighten us all? smile Laura -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 6:11 PM To: 'U2 Users List'

Re: [U2] create.index and numeric dict names

Symeon: It doesn't work for me either (UD v7.2.3 on Windows 2K3). Log it on the BB Bug report. Bill Symeon Breen said the following on 1/7/2010 2:28 PM: A funny on unidata 7.1 on linux - For a particular reason

Re: [U2] Count question

In message d85db451e1913e4d9889cfb25543b24701975...@auexci01.ad.internal, Boydell, Stuart stuart.boyd...@spotless.com.au writes Whoops - forgot the reuse function: LIST MY.FILE EVAL SUM(GTS(MY.MV.FIELD,REUSE(0))) In this instance you might need SUM() twice ... Note that when the example was

Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

Firstly, given that InterCall is a C-API I am puzzled what you are doing and exactly why you need to use it? As a C client application, you could only invoke it from UV via UV shell or via GCI call. Which are you doing? Secondly, UniRPC and it predecessor - UVRPCD has virtually always required

Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125

Oh UV and UD on the same server? -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of David Wolverton Sent: Friday, 8 January 2010 10:11 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: Re: [U2] UniRPC returning 39125 And that was the

[U2] Re Count Question

BZ 001 A 002 11 003 biggrnZero 005 5R 006 S 008 F;11;C0;;S ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Re: [U2] Count question

Well spotted, SUMMATION() will add all the value entities - summation(gts(field,reuse(0))) S -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Anthony W. Youngman Sent: Friday, 8 January 2010 07:45 To: