By the way my name is Dave. Not sure why you are ranting.
--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Laura Hirsh la...@lhirsh.org wrote:
From: Laura Hirsh la...@lhirsh.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Has anyone ever heard of Kyle Stetson?
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Date: Friday, April 8, 2011, 9:27 PM
Hey Charlie,
Laura, I believe Joe Chelston posted the have you ever heard of message,
not mrparkland. I assume Kyle Stetson was supposed to be a U2
developer/administrator, but for some reason Joe suspects that it was only
an alias, which is what led to the question. :)
Ron
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks Dave for providing a first name. Is your name Dave Parkland? Are you
willing to provide the name of your company? I think Laura mistook you as
the OP for this post.
I'm with Laura in thinking that in a forum like this, anonymity is not as
professional nor as effective (or even comforting
Group,
I want to ask if anyone has had any experience with Cache and also has
experience with U2 and SQL. I have been out of the MV (U2) since then of
2008, currently .NET (C#) and MSSQL. I have a large MV application written
in SB and Unidata that I would like to re-develop.
The basic roundup:
Hi Don -- Yes, I have experience with UniData, SQL and SQL DBMS's, and I now
work in Cache' However, I have only a very tiny bit of experience with SB
and none with a conversion from SB+UniData to Cache'. Certainly I have a
deep fondness for U2, but I had to make a good business decision a couple
OK, now I'm not finding the ones I thought were on this channel, so search
youtube for MultiValue and you will see both a little 6 minute-ish video and
a 4-part video related to Cache for MV developers.
--dawn
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Dawn Wolthuis dw...@tincat-group.comwrote:
Hi Don --
From: Don Verhagen
I want to ask if anyone has had any experience with Cache and
also has
experience with U2 and SQL.
I don't sell Caché and I don't get any kind of compensation for
saying something nice about them, but I will anyway. ;)
Here is a summary in my blog from 4 years ago:
With any platform change you have to ask what you are getting and what you
are losing compared with where you are.
If you want to evolve the application then your only option is to stay with
U2 because that is the only platform that SB will run on. OK, there was an
attempt to emulate SB on
From my observations, I don't quite agree on Tony's summation of Cache vs U2.
Cache has the same burden as U2 in that they came from mumps where U2 came
from Pick. The biggest difference between Cache and U2 is marketing where
Cache takes on RDBMS and U2 is apologetic for being Pick, but that
On 09/04/11 23:57, David Jordan wrote:
From my observations, I don't quite agree on Tony's summation of Cache vs U2.
Cache has the same burden as U2 in that they came from mumps where U2 came
from Pick. The biggest difference between Cache and U2 is marketing where
Cache takes on RDBMS and U2
Comments within. Again, I am a U2 fan, so I am trying to do a comparison,
not a sales job, although I'm guessing it might sound a bit like Cache
evangelism. I am pragmatic about my choices, so even if I want to like a
more pure MultiValue platform (I started my career on a Pr1me computer,
prior to
I am not familiar with UniData and I am aware that UniVerse has had better SQL
support than uniData. I have found that UniVerse SQL performs well. The
UniVerse query engine is used by both SQL and retrieve, where they pass the
query over to an optimizer engine. One thing that has been a bit
12 matches
Mail list logo
