Re: [U2] Hello ?

Well - it looks like I can talk to myself - lots or practice there. Actually what is this u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org : bounces ??? -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of u2ug Sent: Monday, May

Re: [U2] Hello ?

I hear you. Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 21:43:08 -0400 From: simpson-u...@gerzio.ca To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Hello ? Well - it looks like I can talk to myself - lots or practice there. Actually what is this u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org : bounces ???

Re: [U2] Hello ?

I can see you. This may just be that post Spectrum triptophan nap. Charles Barouch u2ug simpson-u...@gerzio.ca wrote: Well - it looks like I can talk to myself - lots or practice there. Actually what is this u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org : bounces ??? -Original Message- From:

Re: [U2] Hello ?

Thanks Dan - so I guess the list has just gone on hiatus ? -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dan Fitzgerald Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:48 PM To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Hello ?

Re: [U2] Hello ?

Aaaah , Bach. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Barouch Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:48 PM To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Hello ? I can see you. This may just be that post Spectrum

[U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

It is the problem with a reliable product there are not enough issues to keep the list busy. If you had one of the competitor products there would be a ton of issues to deal with to keep multiple forums busy. Funny how buggy software can look good, because there are a ton of forums to deal

[U2] Limitations of uvrestore

I have just finished some testing of uvbackup and uvrestore on AIX and Linux to see if there are areas to improve performance. The results were interesting, and somewhat alarming - see http://gdoesu2.wordpress.com/2011/05/02/facts-about-uvbackup-and-uvrestore/ for details. What I am interested

Re: [U2] Hello ?

LOL! -Original Message- From: u2ug simpson-u...@gerzio.ca Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:51 PM To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] Hello ? Aaaah , Bach. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org

Re: [U2] Limitations of uvrestore

I don't know of anyone who actually relies upon uvbackup/restore for their backup/restore strategy. Other than supposedly support online backups and checking file integrity - I would see it's relatively slow speed as another reason not to utilise it. Other DB vendors tools tend to suffer from

Re: [U2] Limitations of uvrestore

...Although, as the OP seems to be using it for transfer from AIX to Linux, it's almost the simplest way to have it do all the fnuxi-ing for you. Another gotcha to look out for with AIX-Linux (bigendian-littleendian) transfers using uvbackup is that it doesn't properly restore files with

Re: [U2] Reliability doesn't raise enough issues to keep the list busy

From: David Jordan It is the problem with a reliable product there are not enough issues to keep the list busy. If you had one of the competitor products there would be a ton of issues to deal with to keep multiple forums busy. Funny how buggy software can look good, because there

Re: [U2] [UV] Marking New Index as Built

Thinking back to Prime INFORMATION, that was the default behaviour. You could have deferred updates pending and still have new transactions update the indexes. But, then, in Prime INFORMATION BUILD.INDEX and UPDATE.INDEX were two separate commands, unlike the UniVerse implementation.