Solaris? Check MFILES does not get anywhere near 256 ( I tend to use 220 for a
safety margin ) unless you have extendedFILE.so.1 loaded in a trusted location.
Otherwise check the file, any indexes, and file permissions as well as she king
what locks are set.
Regards
JayJay
Sent from my
Do you have the index definition and the code plus a sample result?
Regards
JayJat
Sent from my iPad
On 21 Feb 2014, at 22:49, Will Johnson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
I always understood the index to be atomic, so Macke selects Macke and
Mackenzie selects Mackenzie
-Original
ALLOWMARKS in uvconfig??
JayJay
On 26 Nov 2013, at 16:15, Chris Austin cjausti...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I noticed an error when doing a UVRESTORE. We have a UniVerse region with
client information and data. When doing a UVRESTORE I get the following
Restoring c:\CHRIS/I_CLIENT
This sounds like permissions. Try running as Administrator. Worth noting that
the current tool is XAdmin, UniAdmin has been pretty much replaced.
JayJay
On 19 Nov 2013, at 16:39, mhilb...@ppcsoftware.com wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm installing a UV windows 11.1 and am trying to change the
The process monitor from Microsoft sysinternals will allow you to trace a
process and it's timing.
Regards
JayJay
On 21 Aug 2013, at 14:57, Aaron Titus ati...@fwdco.com wrote:
hmm.. ten doesn't seem like that much. The way you describe the problem it
sounds like a directory-level
Beat me to it Brian.
Use the process monitor from the says internals tool set to filter out all
executables except the one you want to monitor. This could either be the
specific process or (I think) the task scheduler process itself and include
child processes.
Once you get a failure, save
Kevin,
Could someone be constantly using /process_name to constantly jump around the
system? If so, the. One of the SB files will build up a history (not recalling
which one off the top of my head) . Look for a massive increase build up of
records which will point to a culprit user or process.
This could be firewall or timing. Try having Excel per-started - that often
rules out timing and delays. Otherwise check the firewall logs for the VPN as
you may find ActiveX or DDE blocked.
JayJay
On 27 Jul 2013, at 19:13, Al DeWitt adew...@stylmark.com wrote:
I have a program that opens an
Check UDT_SPLIT_POLICY in the current release notes. It avoids an unneeded
split if a record is re-written and has not changed size. It may apply to your
situation.
Regards
JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 12 Jul 2013, at 17:51, Susan Lynch sly...@fwdco.com wrote:
Cindy, when some of our
A 64-bit client needs a 64 bit ODBC driver. Both 32 and 64 bit are currently
available.
Regards
JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 11 Jul 2013, at 22:35, John Hester jhes...@momtex.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
due to the age of
An android and iOS app. would seem a good fit here. Does this seem a useful
idea?
JayJay
On 11 Jul 2013, at 00:47, Peter Cheney peter.che...@firstmac.com.au wrote:
Hi Symeon,
Interestingly we're facing a similar issue here in Oz whereby we're wanting
to send certain activation codes to
U2techconnect on the Rocket web site will allow you to reauthorise as needed.
If you hit a downed system for any reason, Rocket provide 24x7 support - just
call and leave a message for a callback if it's out if hours.
Regards
JayJay
Sent from Copernicus dome
On 5 Jun 2013, at 18:25, Israel,
The best options are probably:
Security subroutines and named common switches (this was covered at U2U under
Data Security and Best Practises
Use wIntegrate thin client (more flexible and secure for this than the thick
client) and log from the wIntegrate server using wIntegrate scripting.
Was the file open to a UniVerse session! Or we're you EXECUTING the RESIZE from
a process that had the file open? The latter can cause issues -close the file
first. If it's AIX and you are running multiple UniVerse shells from crown tab
as foreground tasks (I.e. not as phantoms or by using
In BASIC you can loop/repeat on SYSTEM(14) or INPUT var,-1
If it's Unix, check your stty settings for ocrnl and onlcr. This may give you
an immediate fix.
JayJay
On 22 Feb 2013, at 19:20, Al DeWitt adew...@stylmark.com wrote:
I have an input screen (built with System Builder) where data
A WRITE automatically clears the lock, a WRITEU will keep it. If you are inside
a transaction boundary however, then the lock is kept until the transaction is
committed or abandoned.
Regards
JayJay
On 7 Feb 2013, at 20:46, Jon Wells jwaytwe...@yahoo.com wrote:
What I'm wondering is; what
Don't forget UOLOGIN.
Regards
JayJay
On 28 Jan 2013, at 19:25, bradley.sch...@usbank.com wrote:
There is an undocumented feature: ' ODBCLOGIN'. This is a subroutine
that is called for every ODBC call. You can use this to either blank
prevent ODBC, or setting up restricted login access
Rauf,
The simplest method is to use BCI. This allows you to access other databases
from BASIC using ODBC. Depending on your needs there is also EDA which allows
you to export U2 data to another database for concurrent access. You could also
access your U2 database using ODBC, JDBC or simply
If you are planning to use ADE, then please *plan*. As David says, a
strategy to manage encryption keys is absolutely necessary, and planning for
worst-case scenarios is recommended.
1) Backups - how (and where) do you manage keys.. Do you keep the keys with
the data (as an example)?
2) If you
The usual reasons are an RPC timeout (check unirpcservices - default 3600) or
needing a keep alive on a VPN or firewall.
Regards
JayJay
On 19 Oct 2012, at 18:54, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
What are the various factors that control if and when a Uniobjects session
will timeout?
A quick question. Are you looking at UniVerse replication (the old style). Or
U2 replication in 11.1 on? They are quite different animals.
Regards
JayJay
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
UV_UDRSYS shows no replication systems defined (empty)
UV_UDRPUB shows six published files (you can list the file to see what's
defined)
UV_UDRSUB shows no subscribed files (empty)
It's possible that the original publisher system details were lost at some
time in the past - possibly an upgrade?
...@gmail.com wrote:
Its Universe 10.3.1 on Red Hat 5, so I'm guessing its the old style?
Is the replication tool a part of the UVClient windows software?
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:43 PM, John Jenkins u2g...@btinternet.com wrote:
The file has been marked for replication. Depending on your
You might try adding a TCP timed wait delay on the server - I usually use 5
minutes. See http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc938217.aspx for
Windows. Unix boxes vary but have a similar
type of parameter tucked in the TCP configuration parameters. Sometimes they
are card or TCP
The file has been marked for replication. Depending on your UniVerse version
this is either old style replication, or the newer U2 replication. If it
should not be replicated then use the Replication configuration tool or XAdmin
to turn this off for the file. You may also want to check your
Message-
From: John Jenkins u2g...@btinternet.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Sat, Sep 8, 2012 7:28 am
Subject: Re: [U2] [Windows]
I suspect the database does not have device licensing. Check with confprod or
unregen -z
2012, at 17:57, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
This system entry is empty.
-Original Message-
From: John Jenkins u2g...@btinternet.com
To: U2 Users List u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Cc: u2-users u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Sent: Fri, Sep 7, 2012 9:54 am
Subject: Re: [U2
If you are using device licensing, SYSTEM(51) has some useful information.
Regards. JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 7 Sep 2012, at 14:59, Wjhonson wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
The -o as I reported earlier only links it to the instantiating pid which
is of course, much to my dismay, just the
For UniVerse users, remember those handy pseudo-attributes 9998 and .
Regards
JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 4 Sep 2012, at 18:18, Morelli, David W. dmore...@pacificu.edu wrote:
LEN(@RECORD) is a sufficient answer to the underlying question. I had
remembered LEN and couldn't recall the
Try a COMO and see if it's coming from a terminal ENQ response. Also worth
checking if uvsh has been aliases at the Unix level.
JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 17 Aug 2012, at 21:33, Rick Nuckolls r...@lynden.com wrote:
I think that Robert made a good guess.
Any site that has a c program
dbpause and dbresume allow any background processes (e.g. PHANTOM or
WebDE (Redback)) to continue running. You do not have to have a restart
procedure.
Additionally, as long as your backup methodology is brief - a SAN snap or
a mirrored drive split - then anyone using Telnet, UniObjects or ODBC
UniVerse has BASIC API extensions that support calling http with secure
sockets. I suspect this will do the job for you if the web service is exposed.
Regards JayJay
Sent from my iPad
On 15 May 2012, at 15:14, Jacques G. jacque...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello,
A need has come up where I
I use PQN PROCs regularly, including indirect buffer references (subscripts)
and select buffer manipulation, UniData and UniVerse do have significant
differences though. MV for primary and secondary input and output buffers is a
staple, but sometimes the older style A\ and similar become
Final word (honest) - should we petition for a COME FROM x statement? It
would solve toe GOTO problem.
Regards
JayJay
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
We've recently added a new UniData tuneable to udtconfig UDT_SPLIT_POLICY
which can help conserve space when an overflowed dynamic file splits. The total
size of the contents are not necessarily the same as the physical file size.
Always worth checking with guide and the latest fixes and
...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
On 25/04/12 15:46, John Jenkins wrote:
We've recently added a new UniData tuneable to udtconfig UDT_SPLIT_POLICY
which can help conserve space when an overflowed dynamic file splits. The
total size of the contents are not necessarily the same as the physical file
We are looking at options for larger files in UniData as there are some BIG
data sets out there. The options that are being looked at include (and in no
particular order):
1. 64 bit files - over 2Gb
2. Distributed files (like UniVerse)
3. More dat/over/idx files - going from datnnn to dat
All,
I've been keeping an eye on the BDT exchanges. If we can get a group consensus
on bugs and issues rated as Show Stoppers, Must Have, Should Have and
Could Have points then let's see if it has legs.
Would someone be willing to step forward and collate responses so that we can
get a
To use 32 bit UniVerse client software on a 64 bit Windows platform, you need
to set up the DSN with odbcad32.exe from syswow64 (not system32). If your
client software is 64 bit then you need UniVerse 11.1 whIch has 64 bit client
software, and updated SQL/ODBC as well.
Hope this helps.
If DesignBais is using it's own connection pooling or cacheing mechanism
then it's possible the update request is not being made on the same
UniObjects connection on which the lock was created. The result is exactly
the same as you would expect from two different TELNET sessions - one locks
the
compiled code
On 23/12/11 17:58, John Jenkins wrote:
I've seen some significant problems with Nod32 AV as well so I avoid it.
(There's a TechTip).
I've not really played with it (when I did it didn't have on access
checking, though I think that's recently been added), but what about ClamAV
I've seen some significant problems with Nod32 AV as well so I avoid it.
(There's a TechTip).
Regards
JayJay
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
What's the volume here? Adding the ORDER BY clause will cause the data to be
pre-processed before the result set starts to get returned.
Also, if you ignore how long it takes to *start* returning the result set,
how do the two compare in returning the *complete* result set?
Regards
JayJay
I am out of the office until 31/12/2010.
The mail box of John Jenkins is being deactivated and will be deleted at
31.01.2010.
To look up e-mail addresses of IBM employees for which you know the name,
use this site :
http://www.ibm.com/contact/employees/be/en/
To look up general telephone
1) Check your UniData release - there have been fixes (release notes on the
U2 product matrix)
2) Allocate more memory O/S and udtconfig
3) Check if you are performing a recursive allocation of memory - you should
exhaust / remove any previously used data sets (if any).
It would be worth
If you are using uvbackup / uvrestore drop the triggers first.
Regards
JayJay
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Mark Eastwood
Sent: 01 June 2009 20:19
To: U2 Users List
Subject: [U2] Triggers and Account Copy
Uv
It's really useful for archiving if the key contains a date - build the
algorithm on the date in the key and have a separate partfile for each year
(or quarter or month - you get the idea),
When you want to archive old data you just drop the partfile concerned -
remembering to add new partfiles
No issues - only fret if retries start to get to many times the number of
collisions on the same semaphore
(they look just fine)
Ignore the LOGIN semaphore - I guess everyone logs in and logs off at the
same time of day by the numbers - yes?
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From:
, license was the first thing I checked.
Adam Taylor
Program Manager
713.795.2352
www.INXI.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Jenkins
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:35 PM
To: u2-users
License expired? Could be as a result of a targeting change and may have
been counting down for a while.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Adam Taylor
Sent: 12 May 2009 22:03
To:
A common cause is a READ, WRITE or DELETE of an O/S level text file in
BASIC. Import/export programs and an unexpectedly large file?
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
Sent: 06
Check the file opens at the O/S level:
e.g.:
File CUSTOMER - type dynamic
find CUSTOMER -print -exec fuser -u {} \;
Also:
fuser -u CUSTOMER
Look for any PIDs that have the file opennot a guarantee if it's
logically open but not physically open (i.e. rotated out in the rotating
file pool)
Sometimes problems like this can arise if you run UniVerse foreground shells
from root crontab on AIX (ans: donbt do it).
crontab -l as root will give you the list of jobs - take a look (maybe). This
can leave a footprint behind if it's historic - compare the number of attaches
on the
Is this Character, GUI or SB/XA?
Firstly the character must exist in your selected font - whatever mode is
used (check).
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Victor Henderson
Sent: 05 May
Bill
If you can't rename at the Windows level, it's either file permissions or
the file is in use.
Set UniData to start manually in the control panel services applet and stop
UniData - can you rename it? If not the reboot and try again. If you still
can't rename it then it's Windows permissions
If you bought UniData from an OEM/VAD as part of an embedded application
solution you need to speak to them - you bought a solution, not the
database. Otherwise if you email u...@us.ibm.com with your reasons for
requiring a re-authorisation then as long as your current version of UniData
is
A common disconnect is to think of UniData and UniVerse as databases - they
are not. MV databases are Application Servers with an integrated database.
At least ONE major U2 consumer was headed off this route when they found out
a migration would have left them with a database - but no
For anyone currently using Message Queues - please switch to sockets - I
speak from personal experience that the performance and throughput gains
were huge.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:owner-u2-us...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf
Bill,
Is this the same behaviour you get if you log in as a Windows console user
and create a file?
Regards
JayJay
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Phantoms (and also Connection Pool licenses) are still concurrent UniVerse
sessions - so in calculating any system-wide parameters for the Operating
System you should account for all processes including PHANTOM and CP usage.
If you use VERY large numbers of PHANTOMS this is something you need to
I am pretty sure the code for STEAL.FILE is in the newsgroup archives
somewhere. I have written it and I am sure others have as well - at least ONE
of those should have survived. Many years ago (VMARK days) I donated a copy to
the UV User group (showing my youth) - not sure where it went from
Don't forget Remote Verbs (aka Security Subroutines). The combination of
triggers and remote verbs is pretty robust, but not rock solid if someone
has access to the REAL O/S outside a database shell (for DIR files anyway).
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If UniVerse is running then the options are:
1, Stop UniVerse, copy, start UniVerse
2. SUSPEND.FILES ON; sync (recommend if Unix); copy; SUSPEND.FILES OFF
3. If you use a SAN or can split mirrors, then take a SAN snap or split a
mirror, and copy that elsewhere (the suspend is minimal)
4. Take
David
UniVerse does not use multicore at all - indeed it does not use anything
that relates to the hardware. It uses the standard APIs available in the
Operating System, efficient use of the hardware platform is solely down to
the Operating System.
Worth being very specific with the core usage -
XTerm and Telnet don't support device licensing - you can use them as
Termulators just fine, but each connection counts as a separate database
license slot.
With Device Licensing (Enterprise, Workgroup, or the more recent Device
Licensing for Server release), a specific (variable) protocol
What are you using to drive this? -
Web Services
ODBC
SOAP
WebDE/RedBack?
What Web Server?
08 is not a common occurrence - I suspect your data or Web program logic as
the most likely source - any backspaces in your data ? (08).
If you could post a specific example with some commentary we might
Try a different network card, and police the network for a rogue / duplicate
IP address,
If you are using a double-gated Network card, disconnect one of the
interfaces (seen some issues with MAC addresses being duplicated with one
manufacturer's cards).
If you are using an X.25 WAN take a long
If you want a client that supports Device Licensing then it would need to
contain the IBM client-side DLLs and their API interfaces. Worth speaking to
some 'nix TELNET developers to see if they can negotiate the DLLs under
license from IBM.
Otherwise - if you can run Windows applications under
And a few more PROC commands for the die-hards:
(I love them ! (sorry Wally !!)
(from memory - I think I got it OK)
BTW:
H = Hollerith
O=Output literal display text that follows
Sn -set input buffer position to n (no blanks allowed in most flavours - a
bit like var-1=xx)
IP: - Input (key data) at
Imminent - due very soon indeed...
*almost* at breath-holding stage
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Chiang
Sent: 17 July 2008 14:44
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UD - Unidata 7.2 Status
Does
Symeon is spot-on.
If you use Connection Pooling your COMMON block belongs to whichever CP
member (server process) which you happened to get when you used THAT pool.
This can be very useful, it can also catch you out if you are not aware of
it. Also remember that CP members persist after you
Bill
no defined services you can ignore.
_
the handle is invalid means that the process concerned tried to use a TCP
data stream after it had been destroyed (typically using x to terminate a
TELNET client).
_
xon/xoff failed looks like it is probably the same as above.
_
ntdll.dll
It sounds like missing or unregistered DLLS - otherwise permissions. This
link from the MSDN forums may give some pointers:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.visualbasic.interaction.cr
eateobject.aspx
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jerry
The problem you tend to hit is that a single record update to a UniVerse
file constitutes a change to the file - so the whole file gets locked at the
O.S level while the AV software scans the whole UniVerse data file through
memory.
It can be a killer as multi-megabyte / multi-gigabyte
Did you try fnuxi -o and then (maybe) fnuxi -6 while pushing?
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brutzman, Bill
Sent: 30 May 2008 20:53
To: 'u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org'
Subject: RE: [U2] [UV] fnuxi Question
Good idea. I
Doug is spot on with this one - UVSYNC is usually the culprit, we always
turn it off on AIX - depends on other systems.
Other one worth watching for - an application bottleneck in the exit routine
(e..g ON.EXIT). I've seen a control file with one record that gets appended
to every time someone
You could use an indirection in the I-Descriptor as well - use a SUBR which
then constructs a subroutine name and uses CALL @ syntax.For preference
I would resolve all these at the start of a user session in one fell swoop
and store the names in a dimensioned named COMMON block, using EQUATES.
Hi Martin
There are a number, but client confidentiality means I canbt respond
unfortunately.
If you follow up with [EMAIL PROTECTED] they should b3 able to assist if the
sites are referenceable
Otherwise - if you can let me know offline by PM who the Company is I may be
able to put you in
Otherwise - did you make any changes to the indexes and copy the files
while the change was In progress?
Regards
JayJay
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
If you are on UniVerse try setting the ALLOWMARKS flag in uvconfig, run
uvregen, restart UniVerse and then programmatically delete them (if you
generated the keys, hopefully you can recreate them),
Otherwise - (as others have advised) SELECT and copy what you want, blat the
file (CLEAR-FILE) and
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Jenkins
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] RE: UNIDATA 7.1 performance measures
Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see
one of the system constraints and assume that's your
All
Just a caution: VISTA Service Pack 1 is a huge beast. It's currently on
voluntary download only (around 600Mb I think) and will be in Windows
Update shortly.
Any experience of SP1 out there?
There have been various warnings about some program compatibilities and also
device drivers.
Ibd start by looking for specific bottlenecks. Itbs too easy to see one of
the system constraints and assume that's your bottleneck (been there). Run some
mete
As others have said, see a specific bottleneck first then take it from there.
Some suggestions on things to look at in Windows and
Hi Doug
There's a few things to bear in mind - up front is to remember that
encryption means that. So make sure you back up your encryption key
repository every time you make a change to the encryption keys and
permissions used. Also remember that if you back up encrypted data for the
future,
You might want to check that read-ahead is turned off as well. It's great
for multi-GB sequential processing of files by SQL but a pain for random
file access.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark F.
Sent: 03
There were some changes to do with PHANTOMS being woken from a SLEEP when
the parent process terminated. It would be interesting to check your
UniVerse release against the Product Availability Matrix:
10.1.14
7659If one UniVerse process was executing a SELECT statement
against a file,
Thinking back - a vague bell rings. I don't think it's directly related but
the resolution was a combination of TWO settings:
1. NOTIFY in the PHANTOM's parent
2. Breaking up a LONG sleep to more manageable smaller chunks in a loop.
Have you tried varying the NOTIFY setting in the process that
I've run multiple instances of VMWARE Workstation if that helps?
Remember that each concurrent VM running UniVerse is a separate UniVerse
license though.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony G
Sent: 02 February 2008 02:52
I saw Adam's shoes :-( Big?
His plates of meat were humungous
And oh yes - IBM are recruiting in the UK too.
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of doug chanco
Sent: 28 January 2008 02:04
To:
Windows prefers scripting language nowadays to BAT files. There is an
article in the IBM Knowledge Base I think in building these for some
specific activities. You could use it as the equivalent of the Unix at job
queue I am sure.
Something like:
MYCMD.VBS
--
Set ShellQueue =
Yes
Pr1me had a few other tricks as well. One useful item was that any Pr1ME
Information client session only ever had ONE remote process when accessing
over Pr1menet, and the process was kept alive as long as you had an active
remote lock.
As a result, the overheads of starting a remote process
I've re-parsed the document to show the hierarchy more easily - if you use a
proportional font it may get jigged about again (we'll see):
Items xmlns=
itemNumber123456/itemNumber
itemNumbers
convNumber
convNumber2586
And of course there's wIntegrate in thin client mode for those that are
considering this.
Regards
JayJay
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Dennis
It sounds like your Terminal Emulation has this configured for a local COPY
function. Check the Termulator setup as that's the issue. If necessary you
can change the BREAK sequence to something else on the server stty break
setting or PTTERM as appropriate.
Hope it helps
Regards
JayJay
It's a business call rather than file size (as long as you have a 64-bit
file system of course ;-)
64 bit files have a larger internal addressing structure so are
theoretically marginally slower than equivalent 32-bit files and on a
like-for-like basis they are larger for the same data volume
A netstat -na as well.
I use device licensing a lot and haven't seen this one
Take a look at the client systems showing the odd address and compare it to
the rest - any difference in platform, O/S, users, termulator, LAN
properties or client?
If you were using a termulator with a
Doug
John is spot on - only PHANTOMS from root crontab please. Of course you have
to run a foreground shell to launch the PHANTOM so please use one of 3
options:
1. Don't use root
2. Use great care and make sure there are no overlap opportunities (one at a
time)
3. Use an OS level Lock file
In case there is any interest - many years ago (14 - past hat etc) we built
a complete U2 based interactive voice system with integrated telephony
interface. It ran on x86 (SCO at the time) and used Dialogic 'phone cards
and quite a lot of C code.
Just to show it can be done inside U2..
Out
Any chance you are running a UniVerse foreground task from root crontab on
AIX?
Regards
JayJay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Chanco
Sent: 13 December 2007 20:49
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] anyone seen this error
Bill
The usual candidates:
UDT.OPTIONS 109 ON (Telnet nodelay) for input
Otherwise the likely candidates are:
1. VPN tunnel configuration
2. WAN network configuration
3. Any contention on the TELNET port? (change it from port 23 to something
else and see).
4. (maybe) Broadcom NIC and
1 - 100 of 302 matches
Mail list logo
